It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Thank you.

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

Help ATS via PayPal:

# Whould you get in this if I told you it goes to the moon?

page: 6
20
share:

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:11 AM

So you claim the gravity on the moon is the same as on earth....

Of course I don't.

But you would still need a lot of fuel to leave the moon.

And the fuel tanks are just not there.

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:12 AM

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish
I have a question.

Where are the fuel tanks?

Have you tried doing a simple internet search to see where fuel tanks are supposed to be?

here's a drawing I found on the internet showing the location of the fuel tanks (I highlighted the labels for you):

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:14 AM

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish

So you claim the gravity on the moon is the same as on earth....

Of course I don't.

Well, that is what you are claiming....

But you would still need a lot of fuel to leave the moon.
And the fuel tanks are just not there.

So how about you work out exactly how much they would have needed, and tell us how much space that fuel would have taken up.... also tell us the weight they lifted from the moon.

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:18 AM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:19 AM
To add to my post above, here is a more detailed look at the LM's propulsion system (along with fuel tank locations).

Note: This link opens directly to a PDF file:
Apollo Lunar Module Propulsion Systems Overview

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:20 AM

So how about you work out exactly how much they would have needed, and tell us how much space that fuel would have taken up.... also tell us the weight they lifted from the moon.

Because I cant be bothered.

I know enough to know, that it would take a very large amount of fuel to break free from the surface of the moon. And then to get into orbit. And then come back to earth.

I don't see any fuel tanks.

Do you?

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:21 AM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift

(post by OneBigMonkeyToo removed for a manners violation)

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:24 AM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:24 AM

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish
I know enough to know, that it would take a very large amount of fuel to break free from the surface of the moon. And then to get into orbit. And then come back to earth.

So you think the lunar module took off from the moon, then came back to earth....

I don't see any fuel tanks.
Do you?

Yes.

You actually have to look at them to see them!

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:25 AM

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish

So how about you work out exactly how much they would have needed, and tell us how much space that fuel would have taken up.... also tell us the weight they lifted from the moon.

Because I cant be bothered.

I know enough to know, that it would take a very large amount of fuel to break free from the surface of the moon. And then to get into orbit. And then come back to earth.

I don't see any fuel tanks.

Do you?

I showed you the fuel tanks.

And the LM didn't need fuel to get back to Earth. It linked with the Command Module (CM), which then had the fuel to get back to earth. The LM didn't come back with them on the trip to Earth (except for Apollo 13, for which the LM was used by the crew as a temporary lifeboat until the damaged CM could get back to earth).

By the way, the amount fuel the CM needed to get Back to earth is not that great (at least not relatively). Once the Command Module broke the gravity of the moon, which is a small gravity well, the CM would basically "fall" back to Earth, with the Earth's gravity accelerating the craft as it fell back to Earth.

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:30 AM

Well this house clearly needs some experienced handyman ,because they didn't learn anything from the efficient packing of the lunar module. .

But other then that this house could be lunar proof..

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:32 AM
the following post is for entertainment purposes only :

lets use the OP logic - at its true absurdity :

i cannot see the fuel tanks - how does it fly ?

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:33 AM

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
the following post is for entertainment purposes only :

lets use the OP logic - at its true absurdity :

i cannot see the fuel tanks - how does it fly ?

The fuel is in the wings.

Shusshh don't tell anyone.

This plane only fly's around the world.

look how big it is and how much fuel it needs.
edit on 5-4-2016 by ProfessorPatternfish because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:34 AM
Here is the velocity needed to escape the Moon's gravity: 5323.9 mph
Here is the velocity needed to escape the Earth's gravity: 25,020 mph

That is a beginning point for you.

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:37 AM

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
the following post is for entertainment purposes only :

lets use the OP logic - at its true absurdity :

i cannot see the fuel tanks - how does it fly ?

The fuel is in the wings.

Shusshh don't tell anyone.

The fuel tanks for the LM descent stage are inside the descent stage.
The fuel tanks for the ascent stage are covered by a shroud on the outside of the ascent stage.

Shusshh don't tell anyone

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:39 AM

how do you KNOW that - you cannot see them - you can only see wings

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:44 AM

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
the following post is for entertainment purposes only :

lets use the OP logic - at its true absurdity :

i cannot see the fuel tanks - how does it fly ?

The fuel is in the wings.

Shusshh don't tell anyone.

This plane only fly's around the world.

look how big it is and how much fuel it needs.

The Boeing 747-400 can carry 624 passengers with their baggage.
That is just 622 more people than were in the LEM... not even counting the 747 crew.
Just a bit different.
Oh, and 747's don't have liquid fueled rockets on them.

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 09:46 AM
a reply to: Soylent Green Is People

I was just looking at that image on Google images I was going to post it.

posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 10:01 AM
Someone posted earlier. Fuel tanks, not just in a schematic.

new topics

top topics

20