It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Whould you get in this if I told you it goes to the moon?

page: 14
20
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 01:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: Schmoe1223

You think the government had something to do with this ?


awkward.. your last post hinted in the governments involvement.



The secretive nature of the governments on all topics but NOT THAT TIME....just that ONE TIME they told everyone the whole story and that is the bottom line!!!
www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 02:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Sorry if I got the name of it wrong.

I typed Apollo Moon Lander 13 in Google and it gave me that image, so I guess it must be true?

Whatever its correct title is. NASA is convincing everyone it went to the moon.



And you have proof they didn't go to the moon because....?

Because you think a craft they used looks flimsy and would break if you farted while inside of it?

Have you built one of those crafts with the materials they say it is built with, flown it to the moon, and farted inside of it to see if it is that flimsy?

No?

Then what's the point of your thread, besides to tell the rest of ATS that you don't think a craft built by NASA to go to the moon isn't strong enough to withstand one of your farts?



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 03:41 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy


"Kein Problem Metzgerkerl".



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 04:00 AM
link   
I'm confused.

The Apollo guys didn't go to the Moon in "that", they went in a much sturdier and heavier Command Module. The LM was used only for getting from lunar orbit to the surface and back to the lunar orbit.
edit on 8-4-2016 by wildespace because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 04:02 AM
link   
a reply to: wildespace

That's about the gist of the situation.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 04:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: wildespace
I'm confused.

The Apollo guys didn't go to the Moon in "that", they went in a much sturdier and heavier Command Module. The LM was used only for getting from lunar orbit to the surface and back to the lunar orbit.


Now you're using facts in a moonhoax thread. That's against the rules, don't you know?



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 05:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: payt69

originally posted by: wildespace
I'm confused.

The Apollo guys didn't go to the Moon in "that", they went in a much sturdier and heavier Command Module. The LM was used only for getting from lunar orbit to the surface and back to the lunar orbit.


Now you're using facts in a moonhoax thread. That's against the rules, don't you know?

If this keeps up, we will find out that the moon does not consist of a cultured and aged dairy product with fungus allowed.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 05:32 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

Maybe that's why we dont go back to the Moon? We dont want to flood the world cheese market hence doom our future generations to economic oblivion.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 07:31 AM
link   
I think the younger generations will soon see why we never went back to the moon.
Once the Chinese land there a couple of times and release some vids showing the crews walking around doing nothing of real value.
You grab some rocks, set up a few automated science stations then what ?



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 07:57 AM
link   
a reply to: samkent

So all the Helium 3 and Titanium that's abundant and that could be mined and utilized is not in the least bit appealing?

Never mind the fact that the Moon is a great place launch a future mission to Mars or any of the other planets for that matter.
edit on 8-4-2016 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 08:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: samkent

So all the Helium 3 and Titanium that's abundant and that could be mined and utilized is not in the least bit appealing?

Never mind the fact that the Moon is a great place launch a future mission to Mars or any of the other planets for that matter.


Yes it is..but currently beyond our grasp. NASA's budget is a fraction of what it was during the Apollo missions. We dont NEED the He3 right now. Im sur the day will come when we will want it , but right now, no one is going to pay to retrieve it from the moon. No conspiracy, just finance



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 08:15 AM
link   
a reply to: 3danimator2014

Our children or "younger generations" might just require such resources through.

They might even fear to tread where the current generation refuse to go and possible launch missions to Mars and other places.

The Moon is our best hope of ever colonizing other worlds and a perfect test bed for refining our technology to do so.

I do agree however that finance is indeed holding back the progress of humanity. To may haves as apposed to the have nots regrading our world. Point of fact its the distribution of wealth amungst or populations that's the problem.
edit on 8-4-2016 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 08:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: 3danimator2014

Our children or "younger generations" might just require such resources through.

They might even fear to tread where the current generation refuse to go and possible launch missions to Mars and other places.

The Moon is our best hope of ever colonizing other worlds and a perfect test bed for refining our technology to do so.

I do agree however that finance is indeed holding back the progress of humanity. To may haves as apposed to the have nots regrading our world. Point of fact its the distribution of wealth amungst or populations that's the problem.


Oh yeah, i mean, im not arguing against exploring the moon. I just wasn't sure if you were suggesting that the fact we haven't been back yet is suspicious. So i was addressing that only.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: 3danimator2014

"Just wasn't sure if you were suggesting that the fact we haven't been back yet is suspicious".

Well lets face it, suspicious sums it up rather nicely but certainly down to the financial implications rather than Aliens/Nazis or even Alien Nazis.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

You never watched Iron Sky?

There's all the proof you need



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I think there is another one coming out quit soon based on the hollow earth legends.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 01:19 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

I've not heard of that. I'll have to search for it.

You should check out the trailer for Irin Sky: The Coming Race (basically Iron Sky 2 lol)



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

a reply to: andy06shake

You guys really need to check out a series of books by W.A. Harbinson called Projekt Saucer, if you haven't already.

It starts with a US scientist/engineer who goes to Nazi Germany to get funding for his revolutionary flying disc technology because the US isn't interested, and he has absolutely no morals, only scientific goals. It goes through WW2 then the cold war and just keeps going.

Excellent fiction, although I think the author actually believes there is something to the story.

W.A. Harbinson wiki




posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

That's the one.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: ParasuvO

And what would be the point in going back? We've been there, collected samples, etc., so why go back?



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join