White House Media CENSORSHIP:'Islamist terrorism' omitted from White House video Spoon fed masses

French President Francois Hollande’s comments this week in Washington about Islamic terrorism -- a term President Obama won’t use -- were omitted from an official White House video.

So Our elected government are just telling us what they want us to hear not the truth. What other Information has been omitted ??

White House Media CENSORSHIP :'Islamist terrorism' omitted from White House video Spoon fed masses

a reply to: TheJesuit

This was kind of covered yesterday.

WH Censors French President Saying ‘ISLAMIST Terrorism’

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: TheJesuit

So Our elected government are just telling us what they want us to hear not the truth.

What is the truth? There are plenty of terrorist groups that have fundamentalist Christian roots. To call them "Christian" terrorists is an affront to all Christians world wide.

The same is true for Islam. Muslims everywhere, condemn these acts of violence and disavow the religious justification, just like Christians disavow the violence done in their god's name, claiming these people are NOT Christians. These are NOT Islamic terrorist. They are terrorist that are using Islam as a ruse, and do not understand the religion of peace any more than, so called, Christians who terrorize in the name of Christ understand the teaching of Jesus.

Not about terrorism it's about censorship aren't you outraged? every single thing you read or watch on MSM conforms you towards their ends .

Sorry about it being covered in another thread but threads only last a few days at most before being resigned to " a few pages down "

originally posted by: TheJesuit

Sorry about it being covered in another thread but threads only last a few days at most before being resigned to " a few pages down "

Its all good, happens to all of us.

Just letting you know why you might not get many replies. Thanks for the thread

Okay so its been covered. Terminology changes when the public becomes to savvy. Todays rhetoric must be the same but not sound the dame, so they can plausibly deny they start dthe last round of hatred towards other cultures and religions.

For instance the media whips public sentiment into a frenzy behind horrific events, then sits back and lets the fires rage.

Plausible deniability. They need to develop new strategies for keeping people fooled and hooked into the program.

if you keep hearing the term Islamic Terrorism for instance, after ten years people start to go hey wait a second, I been hearing about this forever. Pitch a change up.

We don't hear about Humanitarian Interventions anymore, either. Or Assad Must Go. Same with WMD, they have become 'chemical attacks'.

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: TheJesuit

This was kind of covered yesterday.

WH Censors French President Saying ‘ISLAMIST Terrorism’

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Please add further comments to the ongoing discussion in the above linked thread.
Thanks

**Thread Closed**