It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

How supporters for both Sanders and Trump respond to hugs.

page: 1
13
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 11:25 PM
link   
In response to a recent thread about one man holding both Sander and Trump signs while recording peoples reactions I felt it's was only fair to add this to the mix, hugs. How do supporters from each camp respond when one man goes to each others rally holding a sign for free hugs?

Interestingly enough, he was at the rally where the teen girl was maced!

(Free Hugs Project)


In this video, an independent journalist was asking for free hugs from Bernie supporters while wearing a Trump tshirt and was looking to find out what their reactions will be.




edit on 31-3-2016 by Swills because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 11:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

I was in that thread you mentioned if you remember


And I just want to say that the point the guy made in the second video is spot on.

We can overcome our differences, regardless of who's side we're on.

Remember who we're really against, it's not each other.
edit on 31-3-2016 by rockintitz because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 11:45 PM
link   
a reply to: rockintitz

Too bad Trump aims to polarize people and he's very successful.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 11:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

What do you mean by "polarize?"



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 11:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

You can't polarize without an opposing force.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Thetan

Are you saying Trump isn't polarizing people with his messages? Believe it or not, the majority of the population, the entire world included, doesn't like Trump.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: rockintitz

Even within the Republican Party? Word is, he's destroying it.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 11:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

No. I'm merely asking what you mean by the word, "polarize."



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 11:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

America needs more free hug videos.

edit on 2016-3-31 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Swills

Too bad Trump aims to polarize people and he's very successful.

Like waging class warfare isn't polarizing?



Sometimes I wonder if you guys are actually fully aware of your hypocrisy, and are embracing it just to befuddle rational people, or if it really does go over your head.

About the videos:

Obviously fake.

See, I did what you did in the other thread: try to discredit the video producers without a single shred of real evidence (random, unknown peoples' amateur opinions don't count).
edit on 4/1/16 by NthOther because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Thetan

Are you saying you don't know what the word means?



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

I posted his website. He had a Facebook page for his videos but I don't think a YouTube channel. There will be more free hugs videos I'm sure!



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

Precisely, i'm just trying to make sure I understand what you mean by it. Do you mean this?

Polarize-"Divide or cause to divide into two sharply contrasting groups or sets of opinions or beliefs."



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:03 AM
link   
a reply to: NthOther

You can't please all the people all of the time but are saying Sanders is creating a polarization between the wealthy and everyone else? Well, I guess I agree. It's definitely more preferable than banning all Muslims.



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

Is that bad? They all suck, if you didn't get that from my first post..



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Thetan

I'm not sure what your arguing about but I'm about done with it. I understand just fine, you seem to be having difficulty though but at least you googled the definition, so good job!



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

So the "Lesser of Two Evils" hypocrisy defense, then?



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

Why won't you answer the question and why do you assume i'm arguing?



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:08 AM
link   
a reply to: NthOther

I don't view Bernie as evil. I assume because he's a socialist you dislike him.

The lesser of two evils would be Trump v Clinton but I'm done playing that game and if you are two you can always vote for Gary Johnson to help him get 5% of the vote to end the two party domination.



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:09 AM
link   
a reply to: rockintitz

Only bad if you're a conservative.

I agree, they all suck and are rotten to the core!




top topics



 
13
<<   2 >>

log in

join