It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sociology Tech: Any one who has both a king and a god is civilized enough

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 03:39 PM
link   
And having those qualities also entitles to not suffering one's children believing one is a monkey of some wardinian orwelism (bloke's real name is blair" like the witch)

therefore an explosion does not quality as a god, it is heresy and may be tolerated by sodomites so long as they do not impose it on children for tony's sake

capis




posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 03:54 PM
link   
a reply to: wisvol
Why does anyone need either one? Kings and gods are not needed to be "civilized". What does this have to do with Science and Technology?



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:10 PM
link   
Tony Blair?

Nobody has ever claimed we are monkeys or apes, they are our closest link in terms of genetics. Science and DNA shows Darwin wasn't that wrong in fact quite the opposite.

Suppose the world is only a few thousand years old and dinosaur bones were put here for a god's amusement. Then their is all that coal and oil, cliffs of Dover etc.

Big bang is a theory a one with supporting evidence unlike God willed it it does not need a dedication of faith.

I'll add I am a believer in God, the great architect. Science and reason has made my faith stronger.Nobody dictates to me aboit my faith to God(s) I respect religious institutes I just have no time for them. I'd appreciate a similar level of respect in turn.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990

Wow. I was simply going to reply to the OP with some kind of exclamation of bewilderment, but your post saved me from it.

Not only did you apparently understand what the OP was trying to say, you wrote a thoughtful, well-intentioned reply. I'm raising a future pint to you.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:26 PM
link   
a reply to: svetlana84

The freemasons entry test is belief in a god that isn't an explosion

so then by way of consequence people who are stone masons know rocks other thazn "concrete" lol even the name.. "concrete" or "formica"... seriously guys marble?

Okay soo stone cutters know geology dpoesn't prove jesus was a dinosaur okay
no matter what the tv says about it or how many times they put Kent Hovind in the penitentiary public service for no crime for nine years and his wife too



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:27 PM
link   
a reply to: wisvol

What if you know you are both?

And know that both mean nothing in the traditional sense.

beyond that, they mean something powerful in that we are all God kings.

Divine and well within our right.


edit on 3 31 2016 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Klassified

Good questions, thanks for asking.

To restate:




Why does anyone need either one? Kings and gods are not needed to be "civilized". What does this have to do with Science and Technology?


Nobody needs either. It's good to have, as all things good.
Not a prerequisite, a qualifying trait.
Sociology is a science according to the Ivy league and mastering this technology called sociological brain generated comprehension will improve your science of sociology by statistics.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Klassified




What does this have to do with Science and Technology?


I could be wrong here...
I think he's going to make an attempt at an argument against trans-humanism..
Other than that I'm as lost as you are as to what he's talking about.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:30 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

Thanks for contributing positively, ghost buster.

As to the question "what if one thinks they're eiother or both?"
I answer good for you and best of luck. Refinement of theology & politics over time is also beneficial.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990




Suppose the world is only a few thousand years old and dinosaur bones were put here for a god's amusement. Then their is all that coal and oil, cliffs of Dover etc.


Dinosaurs were legged armes serpents who perished for scarrinh the natives
everything is to a degree, for god's amusement
coal and oil are considered property, like water nowadays
and even cattle!

this isn't what Ameica once proudly stood for
overpopulated idiocratic dump in some specific parts unfortunately
greats towns too



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:35 PM
link   
a reply to: NateTheAnimator

Well then in this case allow me to paraphrase further:

trans-humanism as defined by Amartya Sen is okay
as always there's a spook to try and party poop by saying trans humanism implies caves are magic because his magazine said so

therefore I advance an argument rather for sociological understanding



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:48 PM
link   
a reply to: wisvol

I'm not too fussed about ownership of resources, that was not my point.

My point was coal is fossilised trees, it requires time and pressure to evolve to that point. Dinosaurs were reptiles not unlike modern day reptiles but certainly not the same! Also for the record I dare state Dinosaurs did not terrorize natives nor did anything from the Jurassic period or beyond.

I'm bewildered by your America comment. I'm British and I know that the US stood for progress at it's inception and still does for the best part. Science fits the bill for modern western democracies, I believe the founding fathers were in good standing seperating religion from state. You cannot sell to me that it is US stance to believe the Bible as fact, christian ideals yes Theological beliefs and basing them as fact no.



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 04:51 PM
link   
Hmm...

You may be onto something here...



posted on Mar, 31 2016 @ 05:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: svetlana84
Okay soo stone cutters know geology dpoesn't prove jesus was a dinosaur okay
no matter what the tv says about it or how many times they put Kent Hovind in the penitentiary public service for no crime for nine years and his wife too


lol...... OK..... I see now...

Kent Hovind was convicted on 58 counts. Those 58 counts had nothing to do with his creationist ideas.


Why Is Kent Hovind In Federal Prison ?

You will see reports that Kent Hovind is in prison for tax evasion. This is understandable. According to this recent Tax Court decision concerning Mrs. Hovind, neither he nor she were filing 1040s. That is not what he is in prison for. In 2006, a jury found Kent Hovind guilty on all counts of a fifty-eight count indictment. Twelve counts concerned failure to file quarterly payroll tax returns for Creation Science Evangelism (Mr. Hovind’s ministry which operated the Dinosaur Adventure Land theme park). Forty-five counts were for “structuring”. He or his wife made cash withdrawals from the bank in the amounts of $9,500 or $9,600 on forty-five separate occasions between the summer of 2001 and the summer of 2002. The 58th count said he had corruptly endeavored “to obstruct and impede the due administration of the internal revenue laws” . That particular offense reminds me of a crime that the city cops I hung around with in the seventies used to talk about. They called it “ B and A”, which stood for “being an _______”. In Hovind’s case it included filing complaints, making threats and paying his employees in cash and calling them missionaries.

Forbes< br />

I'm not buying the rest of the garbled narrative proposed in these posts.



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 04:12 AM
link   
I am unsure on what the OP is trying to say with "a king and a god"?

From my point of view: any being/spirit no matter how big in size or intelligent that plays around with power pyramid schemes to control and parasite on others being no matter the size or intelligence is objectively evil as shown by the fruits.

The same objective morality that exits in the small also exists on the whole. Do not need any parasite spiritual being neither king nor "god". Karma is a bitch even for spirits that are "god" sized.
edit on 1-4-2016 by LittleByLittle because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 07:44 AM
link   
a reply to: GD21D




Kent Hovind was convicted on 58 counts. Those 58 counts had nothing to do with his creationist ideas. Why Is Kent Hovind In Federal Prison ? You will see reports that Kent Hovind is in prison for tax evasion.


Many artists refuse to finance monsanto and halliburton.



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 07:47 AM
link   
a reply to: LittleByLittle




From my point of view: any being/spirit no matter how big in size or intelligent that plays around with power pyramid schemes to control and parasite on others being no matter the size or intelligence is objectively evil as shown by the fruits.


And I will add: pyramid power is not always bad: in cases of dire straits, having a boss may save your life if he thinks straight enough. Egypt proved in in the form of surviving famine through careful planning, all nations also did this at some point in history, or points for older nations, and where clearly power is heavy and the apex of the pyramid farthest from gravity must thread lightly.



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 07:50 AM
link   
Also, quantum mechanics do not trump gravity, as is claimed by popular science.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 03:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: LittleByLittle




From my point of view: any being/spirit no matter how big in size or intelligent that plays around with power pyramid schemes to control and parasite on others being no matter the size or intelligence is objectively evil as shown by the fruits.


And I will add: pyramid power is not always bad: in cases of dire straits, having a boss may save your life if he thinks straight enough. Egypt proved in in the form of surviving famine through careful planning, all nations also did this at some point in history, or points for older nations, and where clearly power is heavy and the apex of the pyramid farthest from gravity must thread lightly.


The power pyramid always corrupt the top since the top do not listen equally to the observation of the whole society and therefore ignore suffering that can be relived if listening equally. You can get people to accept saving resources for a disaster without a power power pyramid by showing them the facts behind the decision.

There are ideas where you put the people who know things decide on how they should be implemented giving them the responsibility from society to solve the problems that come up. Even today the power pyramid uses these ideas to have specialists that know what should be done that should give the decision makers a plan to implement. The decision makers should be the specialists who know what they are doing since having someone ignorant making a decision over an specialist is just inefficient. Change implementation should be used instead.




top topics



 
0

log in

join