It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump call to punish women for abortions

page: 23
32
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: seeker1963

Well perhaps there are people advocating for it to be legal but you seemed to be upset that you only see people making a fuss over abortion on the news but never prostitution. That may be because the MSM isn't pushing that agenda but there are people who advocate it.

That said, abortion effects more women than selling your body for sex so that's probably the answer you're looking for.


Seriously? Birth control is cheap and widely available! You mean to tell me women are too stupid to realize what happens if they have sex unprotected?

Maybe instead of birth control, we should have women who get pregnant more than once and want an abortion have their tubes tied?

Try as you might, but you really don't believe women have a right to do what they want with their bodies when the only time you ROAR is over abortion..........


Indeed it is time to move out of the most barbaric of dark ages and find better things to do than support abortion like it is the last vestige and most important way of dealing with "pregnancy".




posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:17 AM
link   
Seriously? Birth control is cheap and widely available! You mean to tell me women are too stupid to realize what happens if they have sex unprotected?

Maybe instead of birth control, we should have women who get pregnant more than once and want an abortion have their tubes tied?

Try as you might, but you really don't believe women have a right to do what they want with their bodies when the only time you ROAR is over abortion..........


but contraceptive is not fool proof , its not 100% effective i learnt this is primary school in sex ed seriously how hard is it to understand and why is it the squarely put ion the woman to make sure she doesn't get pregnant.

women have abortions for a number of reasons not just because they didnt use contraceptive same with the pill its not just used as a contraceptive.



edit on 2/4/2016 by kerrichin because: quote not done right



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Trump has a socialist record and married two communist women...so there's bound to be some flip-flopping as he pretends to be a republican and attempts to alienate every minority voting bloc and women.

All in all though, he's doing a bang up job. He has his supporters fooled.


He has his detractors even more fooled.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: seeker1963

Well perhaps there are people advocating for it to be legal but you seemed to be upset that you only see people making a fuss over abortion on the news but never prostitution. That may be because the MSM isn't pushing that agenda but there are people who advocate it.

That said, abortion effects more women than selling your body for sex so that's probably the answer you're looking for.


Seriously? Birth control is cheap and widely available! You mean to tell me women are too stupid to realize what happens if they have sex unprotected?

Maybe instead of birth control, we should have women who get pregnant more than once and want an abortion have their tubes tied?

Try as you might, but you really don't believe women have a right to do what they want with their bodies when the only time you ROAR is over abortion..........


Indeed it is time to move out of the most barbaric of dark ages and find better things to do than support abortion like it is the last vestige and most important way of dealing with "pregnancy".


Easy and cheap steriization for both sexes come to mind.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

That's what so great about all this. His supporters each have their own beliefs and they apply it to Donald Trump however they see fit. He's the Mr. Potato Head of politics.

It's probably why his rallies are so explosive. Everyone finds out that they have the opposite opinions of the person standing next to them.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:45 AM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight

nice cheap, reversible sterilizations that can be done to young children before they hit the age where they need it.. then well, when they are adults, married and in a stable relationship, and proven their worthiness to be parents, well, they can pay the $100,000 to have sterilization, have their 2.5 children, and well, then go back for the free reversal.

don't see what the problem is, except that there will still be a need for abortions, since even though all the people getting pregnant wanted to be pregnant and start their families, there would still be some pretty danged valid reasons that anyone on these boards would find hard pressed to argue with for the abortion!




After being informed 20 weeks into her pregnancy that due to complications the fetus had no chance of survival, Texas woman Taylor Mahaffey, 23, was forced to wait for it to die in the womb because of to a state law that prevented her from aborting it.

Mahaffey and her husband, Daniel, 29, are now advocating to change the law in Texas, which prohibits abortions after 20 weeks, and which they have repeatedly described as "inhumane."

The Austin-based couple went to St. David's Medical Center on March 23. "By the time we got to the hospital, [the fetus'] feet were already coming out of the womb and pushing through the cervix," Daniel wrote in a Reddit post Sunday.

Legally unable to induce the labor, which would ultimately lead to the fetus' death, the hospital sent the couple home.

www.yahoo.com...


women are already being punished across this country for abortion and the prolife cause. Doctors are being force to provide care that goes against the standard of care that has been accepted as the best process to follow for decades upon decades. forced to risk the lives and well being of the mothers..



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Trump has a socialist record and married two communist women...so there's bound to be some flip-flopping as he pretends to be a republican and attempts to alienate every minority voting bloc and women.

All in all though, he's doing a bang up job. He has his supporters fooled.


He has his detractors even more fooled.


Ha...can't disagree with that. Although I might say "equally fooled."



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 11:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy
He's the Mr. Potato Head of politics.


He's the Mr. Potato Head of politics.

Love it! So true.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 11:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: mOjOm

We should almost have a it like any other position of employment. You start near the bottom and work your way up by gaining experience and doing better and being smarter and more capable than those at your same level.


Absolutely! If Trump can't "hang" with the mundane of politics, he has no business being the leader.

As far as Career Politicians, personally I do not want Grass Roots at the level of president.

As I would not want a general practitioner performing heart surgery on me.



I feel this is wrong. The founding fathers of the USA never intended that politics would be a career.
A man with a life time of experience in building, managing and leading business - and more importantly a business that actually produces something - is more than qualified for POTUS.


You mean when there was 13 colonies, how many people, and a country Doctor?

Have you found anyone he does business with that supports him? (not works for him)
edit on 2-4-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 11:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: UKTruth




She is the official spokesperson for the Trump campaign.


That is the reason you give for why I should believe her?

Kool-Aid anyone, because I will take a pass on that drink.


I also know from speaking to Trump every day that he is totally on the level with his policies.


What policies?

IMO policies need a beginning, middle, and end. As in "here's my idea", "this is how I REALISTICALLY plan to implement it", "here is how it will affect our country and its people".

And have you read the breakdown opinions of stuff he is suggesting?


edit on 2-4-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: UKTruth




She is the official spokesperson for the Trump campaign.


That is the reason you give for why I should believe her?

Kool-Aid anyone, because I will take a pass on that drink.


I also know from speaking to Trump every day that he is totally on the level with his policies.


What policies?

IMO policies need a beginning, middle, and end. As in "here's my idea", "this is how I REALISTICALLY plan to implement it", "here is how it will affect our country and its people".

And have you read the breakdown opinions of stuff he is suggesting?



Ahem - Go back and read the context of the post



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

It sounds like you have not looked at Trump's official positions on his official website.
His policies include all of the criteria you mention.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 12:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: mOjOm

We should almost have a it like any other position of employment. You start near the bottom and work your way up by gaining experience and doing better and being smarter and more capable than those at your same level.


Absolutely! If Trump can't "hang" with the mundane of politics, he has no business being the leader.

As far as Career Politicians, personally I do not want Grass Roots at the level of president.

As I would not want a general practitioner performing heart surgery on me.



I feel this is wrong. The founding fathers of the USA never intended that politics would be a career.
A man with a life time of experience in building, managing and leading business - and more importantly a business that actually produces something - is more than qualified for POTUS.


You mean when there was 13 colonies, how many people, and a country Doctor?

Have you found anyone he does business with that supports him? (not works for him)


The logic still holds true today. Career politicians are exactly why Washington is so corrupt - but i know that some like it that way. It's a way for minority interest to subvert the will of the people. There will always be those that support and thrive on corruption.
edit on 2/4/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Annee

It sounds like you have not looked at Trump's official positions on his official website.
His policies include all of the criteria you mention.



His policies are probably the most realistic of all - but he does need to flesh them out more. Saying that his competitors in the race have been copying him of late, so he must be on to something.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 12:23 PM
link   
a reply to: humanityrising

Sorry to continue a divergence from the subject of the thread but:

As mentioned, and as debunked in another thread, Trump never wanted, and never authorized ANY SuperPAC to operate in his name, and denounced them.
This woman never had inside information.

references:
Donald Trump latest: 'Super PACs are a scam'



Presidential hopeful Donald Trump blasted Super PACs on Monday. The business impresario said Super PACs are a "scam" and that they are "very unfair to a person like me who has disavowed all PAC's & is self-funding." Trump took to Twitter to voice his discontent and also said that all candidates should "immediately disavow their Super PAC's."

Trump’s latest target: Super PACs and rich political donors



Trump, the renowned Republican party-crasher, has fired a new broadside at super PACs, the big-money groups channeling hundreds of millions of dollars into the 2016 presidential elections. Trump called on all presidential candidates to break ranks with super PACs supporting them and insist they return all donations. To set an example, Trump’s lawyers sent letters to seven super PACs purportedly backing the renegade candidate, telling each of them, “your organization is not authorized to use Mr. Trump’s name and likeness in connection with its fundraising activites…. We are formally disavowing such activities.”

finance.yahoo.com...
edit on 4/2/16 by BlueAjah because: fix link



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: humanityrising

Sorry to continue a divergence from the subject of the thread but:

As mentioned, and as debunked in another thread, Trump never wanted, and never authorized ANY SuperPAC to operate in his name, and denounced them.
This woman never had inside information.

references:
Donald Trump latest: 'Super PACs are a scam'



Presidential hopeful Donald Trump blasted Super PACs on Monday. The business impresario said Super PACs are a "scam" and that they are "very unfair to a person like me who has disavowed all PAC's & is self-funding." Trump took to Twitter to voice his discontent and also said that all candidates should "immediately disavow their Super PAC's."

Trump’s latest target: Super PACs and rich political donors



Trump, the renowned Republican party-crasher, has fired a new broadside at super PACs, the big-money groups channeling hundreds of millions of dollars into the 2016 presidential elections. Trump called on all presidential candidates to break ranks with super PACs supporting them and insist they return all donations. To set an example, Trump’s lawyers sent letters to seven super PACs purportedly backing the renegade candidate, telling each of them, “your organization is not authorized to use Mr. Trump’s name and likeness in connection with its fundraising activites…. We are formally disavowing such activities.”

finance.yahoo.com...


Yep - if this woman had communication she would have produced it. she has been called an opportunistic liar by the campaign and had zero to come back with.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: UKTruth




She is the official spokesperson for the Trump campaign.


That is the reason you give for why I should believe her?

Kool-Aid anyone, because I will take a pass on that drink.


I also know from speaking to Trump every day that he is totally on the level with his policies.


What policies?

IMO policies need a beginning, middle, and end. As in "here's my idea", "this is how I REALISTICALLY plan to implement it", "here is how it will affect our country and its people".

And have you read the breakdown opinions of stuff he is suggesting?



Ahem - Go back and read the context of the post


I already read it.

You need to explain what you think I missed.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: UKTruth




She is the official spokesperson for the Trump campaign.


That is the reason you give for why I should believe her?

Kool-Aid anyone, because I will take a pass on that drink.


I also know from speaking to Trump every day that he is totally on the level with his policies.


What policies?

IMO policies need a beginning, middle, and end. As in "here's my idea", "this is how I REALISTICALLY plan to implement it", "here is how it will affect our country and its people".

And have you read the breakdown opinions of stuff he is suggesting?



Ahem - Go back and read the context of the post


I already read it.

You need to explain what you think I missed.


You read the preceding posts and following and didn't get it? The clue is in the statement. Clue: I don't speak to Donald Trump every day.

edit on 2/4/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 01:05 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

LOL.
You made your point so creatively, that your point obviously continues to be made.

Ever since your post when making your point, I have actually chuckled several times at this thread now.

Which is something... since much of the rest of the thread has been such as a sad representation of the state of society, including the willingness to murder unborn babies, that it breaks my heart and soul.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 01:05 PM
link   
This thread is funny.

It is once again sooth saying for meaning from twisted words. LOL

Too bad this election is not a popularity contest. All that nonsense is what worked before, and failed us misserably. Its kind of what people who support Trump are fed up with. They are done with this BS attacking a candidate and not his ideas.

So far he has not said anything racist or misogynistic, this is all divined by people wanting to believe he is these things.

Its funny. This is why he is winning.

They just dont get it.

edit on 4 2 2016 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



new topics




 
32
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join