It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bernie Sanders at just one digit difference from Hillary Clinton in NY primary Last Poll!

page: 1
11
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 29 2016 @ 05:36 PM
link   
The Peace of God to all that belong to the Light,
Dear Readers,

Today we have seen in the media Hillary Clinton calling publically her rival Bernie Sanders to give up, even suggesting that there is no sense for him to continue campaigning against her, supposedly since She felt has already practically assured the nomination!

Now, even using the most exaggerated numbers of delegates and super delegates, like the ones right now her campaign are advertising as supposedly already assured the reality is that their own computations show that she is still more than 6 hundred delegates far from such pretended point!

Why Hillary is in a hurry to close this competition? What is in behind such a rare excess of Optimism? Why she is playing to be over realistic?

Well there are good reasons,

1) The last three primaries ( Alaska, Hawaii and Washington) have been all for Bernie Sanders, what is worrying so much the Clinton Campaign since it is showing an increase of strength on the Pacific coast in which they were counting with an easy victory for her in California.

www.nytimes.com...

2) There is right now a so much advance progress in the FBI investigation against her in the multiple emails scandal, something she knows can easily knockout her campaign at once. In particular the Immunity that was granted to Bryan Pagliano, one of her ex aides for years in exchange for provide information to the authorities on many until now secret aspects of the way she followed to manage her communications is a really bad news since it shows clearly that the Depart of Justice is looking for the indictment of somebody in all this scandal.

Judge Napolitano : Hillary Clinton should be terrified over new revelation


3) If the official investigation wouldn't be enough, now the so prestigious Washington Post is digging a lot on all this turmoil on their own journalist investigation, and that is also a very bad red flag, for a candidate like her that began her career as a Nixon supporter in late 1960s, and also tried to block the first stages of the Watergate Scandal in their prosecution against the President.

Clinton Benghazi-Emails Gate Scandal took roots

4) Now it comes what could be the great reversal in the momentum of Clinton to the White house: There are polls showing that the so solid trends she had in 2015 to Win NY primary have dramatically vanished, recent numbers are suggesting that by April 19th we are going to see possibly one of the most tied battles for that key state.

The NBC survey Monkey is showing just two days ago Senator Sanders just only 6 points below Clinton in New York:

elections.huffingtonpost.com...

Why it is so crucial if Sanders is able to defeat Clinton in New York ?

Well, If the rule already used by other candidates to decide to end their campaigns, to drop out if they are unable to win in the State they have represented or ruled is applied here Hillary would be in a terrible dilemma with a negative result against her in New York, the State for which she has been Senator for years.


5) This is not the end of the problems for Hillary in the days to come, since before the so important New York State Primary there are other two more than easily can be also taken by the current momentum Sanders is showing.

New Polls are showing that for the beginning of April Wisconsin and Wyoming will be both possibly added as great surprising additional victories for Bernie Sanders Scores, who is either favorite or back from Clinton for just only one digit difference.

www.inquisitr.com...

rinf.com...


The Thread is open to the free discussion for all the members interested, please remain on topic and post respecting the rules of decorum in the communication, refrain to launch personal attacks if you don't share same points of view.

Thanks for your attention,

The Angel of Lightness



edit on 3/29/2016 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 29 2016 @ 05:39 PM
link   
a reply to: The angel of light

Ny'er here and I'll be voting Sanders. There hasn't been many polls between the two or I just can't find them and I've been wondering where Bernie stands against her. Thanks for posting!



posted on Mar, 29 2016 @ 05:45 PM
link   
Good for Mr Sanders. He had an uphill battle against the might of the Clinton Machine, and he's fought a tough battle. Perhaps the script followed by MSM doesn't want to show the gap closing...



posted on Mar, 29 2016 @ 06:00 PM
link   
Good luck Bernie!

If you buy into the narrative that Bernie wont win, and you use it as an excuse to stay home or to vote for someone else instead, remember two things. If you stay home then the narrative will become true. And there is no prize for voting fot the winner, so vote for who you want to win.



posted on Mar, 29 2016 @ 06:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Boscowashisnamo

A good sign for Sanders is how much he's getting in donations. He keeps breaking monthly records and outshining Clinton who is supported by Big Everything. His average donation is like 30 bucks! Lots of people support him so these next primaries and few remaining caucuses will be interesting.



posted on Mar, 29 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   
Clinton was a carpet-bagger senator for New York for a single term. I really don't see New York as her home state the same way Rubio is from Florida or Cruz from Texas. She and Bill are "from" Arkansas--mostly. So for that reason I donlt think she has quite the "home state" advantage that some people think she has.

It would be wonderful of Bernie could win New York. That might shake some super-delegates loose. And of there is a Trifecta (e-mails, etc.) well, who knows what will happen?



posted on Mar, 29 2016 @ 07:08 PM
link   
Clinton has been using psychological warfare since day one.

She learned a lesson against Obama, and this time she got a ton of super delegates on her side before she even started campaigning. She wanted the race to look over from the start. If you couple that with having a media blackout on Sanders, or unfavorable "he's loosing" and "he should just quit" type stories? Yeah, it can seem like people must be nuts to support him.

If you cut through all the crap and look at the numbers...it's not nearly as lopsided as the Hillary machine and the mainstream media would have you think.



posted on Mar, 29 2016 @ 07:46 PM
link   
a reply to: The angel of light

As a Trump supporter I'd like to say good for Bernie. I'm glad the Dems are having at least the pretense of a competitive primary. Can you imagine what the Democratic primary would look like if so many prominent Democrats weren't scared of the Clinton machine, and had actually thrown their hat in the race?



posted on Mar, 29 2016 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: The angel of light

Star and flag!
From the Washington Post article that you linked:

emphasized: “Any unclassified Blackberry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving e-mails, and exploiting calendars.”

Nine days later, Clinton told Boswell that she had read his memo and “gets it,” according to an email sent by a senior diplomatic security official. “Her attention was drawn to the sentence that indicates (Diplomatic Security) have intelligence concerning this vulnerability during her recent trip to Asia,” the email said.

But Clinton kept using her private BlackBerry — and the basement server.

Am I reading too much into this, or did they have reason her BlackBerry may have been compromised while she was in China?
The entire article was enlightening.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 09:26 PM
link   
The Peace of God to all that belong to the Light,
Dear Readers,

What a momentum the one that Senator Bernie Sanders have showed along the last five weeks and along all the first quarter of 2016!!

Please check:
www.cnn.com...

He has completed eight clear victories in a row, one after another from one extreme of the country to the other, Wyoming and Wisconsin have showed that the forecast released in this thread many weeks ago was quite accurate.

We are going to see in New York not the relatively easy Primary the Clinton Propaganda were announced but a huge battle in between a vigorous real native New Yorker defending his unbeaten record of months and this Lady that have showed along the last weeks more and more of her well known personal arrogance, her pretensions of to be part of a great political dynasty just to come.

Please check:
thehill.com...

We are going to see of the Clinton rhetoric is going to work in the great apple:

    - Her systematic way to ignore the public opinion feelings and support all her confidence in the great capitals that are financing her campaign.
    - The dismissal of the hopes of the youngest voters that are so disappointed with what they are receiving from the current administration and are looking for a real entirely new deal.
    - Her cynicism also minimizing so grave serious ethical accusations that remain still unsolved against her, playing to get a nomination in order to shield behind it of any legal charges.
    - Trying to reduce to nothing extremely grave wrong actions she committed in one of the principal offices of the federal government she handle almost as a Dictator for four years.


At still 10 days of New York primary we see Bernie Sanders approaching Hillary Clinton at a distance of a little more than 1 percent of difference, and the trend in his case is to grow every day more in support, while hers is of clear descend on support since the beginning of March.

elections.huffingtonpost.com...

The battle for New York is just only beginning and by the 19th I perceive this could be the real turning point in the Democratic primaries, the moment in which we are going to see emerging a new majority in that party, one so clear and strong that can even decide the next Nominee.

People don't want to vote for the same people that have already ruled , contributing to the poor horizon we see surrounding us, they want new ideas, they want programs and thesis that were never tested before to switch from No Future to a real Future.


Thanks for your attention,

The Angel of Lightness


edit on 4/9/2016 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 09:32 PM
link   
MSM is so in the tank for Hillary that they barely mention when Sanders wins a State. Take tonight...Bernie won Wyoming, and so far, not much mention of it. But when Cruz won Wisconsin, you'd think he had clinched the Republican nomination.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 10:30 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Don't worry Dear carewemust,

I am pretty sure the voters in New York are less interested in anything that comes from the campaign of Ted Cruz than in any other else, after all that candidate publicly insulted New Yorkers many weeks ago in his attempt to refrain Trump attacks against him.

Now, young people is not as ignorant as the campaign propaganda machine think, they are able to see that the Clinton Administration in 1990s did nothing at all to change the economic model of globalization that the George Bush father created, the same that have moved millions of jobs to China and far east leaving the middle class and the workers of this country practically without any opportunity.

Bill Clinton also did his own great contribution to boost the national deficit, he didn't change at all the pattern of acquisition of public debt that was started by his predecessor. The crisis we have seen since then are also the consequence of his lack of action to return to a truly genuinely democratic macroeconomic policies.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 01:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: The angel of light
Bill Clinton also did his own great contribution to boost the national deficit, he didn't change at all the pattern of acquisition of public debt that was started by his predecessor. The crisis we have seen since then are also the consequence of his lack of action to return to a truly genuinely democratic macroeconomic policies.


By the end of Clintons term he balanced the budget, ended his final year with a surplus, and had the nation on a budget path that could have eliminated the debt in just over a decade. He still did his part to increase it earlier in his term, but he did get an actual solution implemented by the end. W and Obama didn't follow along though.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 07:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan
The President doesn't control the purse strings, Congress does.
Cato Institute

Skeptics said it could not be done in seven years. The GOP did it in four.

Now let us contrast this with the Clinton fiscal record. Recall that it was the Clinton White House that fought Republicans every inch of the way in balancing the budget in 1995. When Republicans proposed their own balanced-budget plan, the White House waged a shameless Mediscare campaign to torpedo the plan — a campaign that the Washington Post slammed as “pure demagoguery.” It was Bill Clinton who, during the big budget fight in 1995, had to submit not one, not two, but five budgets until he begrudgingly matched the GOP’s balanced-budget plan. In fact, during the height of the budget wars in the summer of 1995, the Clinton administration admitted that “balancing the budget is not one of our top priorities.”




posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 07:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

Dear Aazadan,

I am sincerely trying to follow you, in other words to understand what is the meaning of the claim that Mr W.Clinton balanced the budget during his administration and so the external debt was magically cancelled on his term.

The statistics don't reflect that at all, I am really so sorry, in 1994 when he was already a year in the White house the federal public debt was already about 4000 millions of dollars, but by the end of 2000, even before he ended his term it had increasingly in at least 50% more to 6000 millions of dollars.

www.mybudget360.com...

By the way the statistics I am including here comes from the US Department of Treasury, financial Management service, so they are official ones.

So that claim is absolutely false, please ground yourself in reality not in political campaign mottos.

Now, Where was the renegotiation of the so unfavorable trade balance with China during the Clinton Era?

we were already at that time importing scandalous amount of dollars from that country but exporting ridiculous levels and it was not necessary to be a Economy Nobel award to see that in the long run that was going to break our own economy, apart of the damage that caused to the countries in free trade with us: Canada and Mexico.

Please check:
www.realclearworld.com...

After 8 years of Obama administration we still export less than 1/4 of what we import from China, and Mrs Clinton was part of that government until 4 years ago and remarkably she was handling the State Secretary that has power to regulate relationships with any country in the world.

The First attack to the World trade center towers occurred during the Clinton Administration ( April 1995) and this occurred after a major terrorist attack in the Alfred P Murrac Federal building bombing at Oklahoma city has already shaken the nation. ( February of 1993)

www.britannica.com...

www.fbi.gov...

However, the nation passed all along the remaining 6 years of that government being never set up under National alert status and no action was taken to screen the assignation of visas to potential terrorists entering to US soil from countries under the influence of Alqaeda.

We were already informed that the obsession of Osama Bin Laden was to demolish in any possible way the World trade center and his people was able to enter with either tourist or student visas to this country after that.


What certainly the Clinton Administration did was to commit terrible mistakes bombing civilians during the civil war in Yugoslavia, many of them were Bosnian muslim refugees.

Please check:
iacenter.org...

Those terrible actions against civil population were later justified by NATO as 'mistakes' , interestingly the same word that Mrs. Hillary Clinton use to refer to the way she handled the security of an Ambassador of the US that was assassinated in Benghazi after weeks calling for help, asking to reinforce his embassy security.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness
edit on 4/10/2016 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 07:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: schuyler

Clinton was a carpet-bagger senator for New York for a single term. I really don't see New York as her home state the same way Rubio is from Florida or Cruz from Texas. She and Bill are "from" Arkansas--mostly. So for that reason I donlt think she has quite the "home state" advantage that some people think she has.


But she said she grew up watching the Yankees on television in the 1950's when she lived in Chicago so she is a real deal New Yorker.

She forgot to mention that it was a magic set that was able to get WPIX before cable was available.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 07:33 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

She could just say that her Grandma used to fly her to NY for the games ..... and they landed under mortar fire.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 07:37 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

What's a server? What's a Benghazi? Give me a dollar.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 07:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

She forgot to mention that it was a magic set that was able to get WPIX before cable was available.


Not magic ... just NBC.



Major League Baseball on NBC is the de facto branding for weekly broadcasts of Major League Baseball (MLB) games produced by NBC Sports, and televised on the NBC television network. Major League Baseball games first aired on the network from 1947 to 1989


Low Hanging Fruit on Wikipedia - Major League Baseball on NBC
edit on 10-4-2016 by Gryphon66 because: Not worthy of you AM.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 07:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Not magic ... just NBC.


Actually, you could not watch Major League Baseball teams more than 50 miles from their home market until 1965 so, no, the Hilldog is still a lying witch for saying that.




top topics



 
11
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join