posted on Jun, 15 2003 @ 12:17 PM
First of all, if this guy really was going to perform a terrorist attack, I seriously doubt he is going to use his real name, esp if the databases are
looking for him.
Second of all, even with our current security, there is NO protection against terrorism. For the better part of 40 years, we have had to deal with
baggage screening, metal detectors, and other assorted problems that were supposed to make us safe.
On 9/11, did they protect us? Not one bit. What have we done since then? Now, we have to have our bags searched very very very carefully to make sure
we dont bring on nail clippers and hockey sticks.
We dont have any real new safety precautions, we just have existing ones enforced to the point of causing serious problems for normal people. If it
didnt work before, what makes anyone think it will work now, esp since any new attacks will have taken such precautions into account?
The best bet for airline security is to follow the lead of El Al: each flight has 2 plainclothes agents on board, one with a Jericho pistol, the other
with a micro-uzi. If a terrorist boards an El Al flight, he doesnt get off alive.
You notice that El Al has never been hijacked?
I am personally in favor of a proposal allowing any credentialed, certified, and sworn law officer in the US to fly with thier firearm loaded and on
thier person during thier normal business flights. This would, in a matter of days, quadrupal the number of "air marshalls" on any given aircraft.
Hell, let a terrorist get on board. When he is carried off in a body bag, Im sure it will make any future hijackers think twice.