It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Hillary Clinton Pushes Area 51 reveal

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:21 PM
a reply to: bigdo13

Yea... Everyon should have free access unless there is a reason... There is always a reason... Power Money Knowledge

posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:26 PM
"unless it's a threat to national security..."

maybe she can just e-mail it to us, then.

posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:55 PM
a reply to: koa41

this made me laugh good and hard...
edit on 26-3-2016 by 5StarOracle because: Word

posted on Mar, 27 2016 @ 12:17 AM

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
This is a desperate act for sure...
To bad area 51 has very little relevance anymore...
It is not much more than a public distraction...
it's all really quite an elaborate charade...
Got everybody looking and wondering about the wrong place...
Someone get her to commit to full disclosure on S4...
this would be much more interesting...

Yes... and while she's at it she can disclose the secret space program and all the tech that will catapult us to a space-fairing civilization.... but why o why would anyone ever do that???

There's more chance of Obama pulling a michael jackson and turning white!

posted on Mar, 27 2016 @ 01:12 AM
Anyone that believes this is incredibly gullible. What a weird thing for her to say though. The conspiracy theorist voting block is really small.

Why would she bring that up out of the blue? Thats the real question.

posted on Mar, 27 2016 @ 02:35 AM
Notice the exceptions with any of her (far and few between)positive conversation, same with marijuana legalization in her view: to the effect of "If marijuana shows positive results in states that legalized then I'd support it". Oh, and the flip flops to appease to Sanders voters and/or those concerned of WS, etc.

posted on Mar, 27 2016 @ 05:18 AM
Hey, she's held several public offices and not peep-squeak then?

Oh wait, it's a campaign yr!!
Sad to say it's promise us everything she can think of and then ignore it "if" she gets elected.
Really, how dumb does she think people are?

Oh yeah...that dumb.

posted on Mar, 27 2016 @ 10:57 PM
a reply to: Zaphod58

We have seen plenty of Janet flights out there.....but as for actual secret aircraft, would we even know what we're looking at? They've gotta be able to cloak stuff by now- if you can create a field around an airframe that eliminates friction, sound, sonic booms and such, then visually obfuscatING something shouldn't be too difficult.

posted on Mar, 27 2016 @ 11:02 PM
a reply to: Natas0114

Harder than you think. But yes, you'd still see aircraft flying out there, if you were to see anything. There are plenty of older aircraft, as well as new aircraft flying around.

posted on Mar, 27 2016 @ 11:10 PM
I thought Jimmy Kimmel asks all candidates about aliens/ufos? Doesn't he? I know there is a certain type of guest he always asks.

posted on Mar, 27 2016 @ 11:25 PM
a reply to: combatmaster

Not everything has to be disclosed a few simple admissions to blow people's minds would suffice...

new topics

<< 1   >>

log in