Obama says: Don't Worry If It's 'Socialist Theory or Capitalist Theory'

a reply to: xuenchen


I wonder how he sees such little difference between the two and why he didn't speak that way when he was running for President. Perhaps he did when he was a community organizer in Chicago. --Wait! Aren't such workers usually communists?

I wonder if anyone has bothered to tally the millions and millions of solid citizens that were eliminated as countries turned to communism? Let's see, the list would start with the USSR, China, and a bunch of others. Should we count the millions they imprisoned also? How about the wholesale destructions of all manner of systems in those countries? He sees them as equally bad/good? His true colors are being revealed more every day as his time wanes.

There is most certainly a push for a more purist socialist state

Yeah, but the push to eliminate socialism entirely and establish a fascist, theocratic authoritarian government is very widespread and dangerous.

In the course of answering the question, the president indicated that the "sharp division" between "capitalist and communist or socialist" is starting to blur, and instead of clinging to any one of those ideologies, people should just do what works to create change:

Obama is a moron.

The difference is:

Capitalism there is the chance of a person becoming their own master. The cream of society always rises to the top.

See Gates,Zuckerberg,Jobs, and the list goes on.

You can thank the CAPITALIST for the current level of technological PROGRESS.

Where as the other two socialism, and communism there really is no damn difference,

That state is the master, and the only thing the people do is become a commodity to the collective.

Those lines are not blurred. Some like to think they are.

Every single thing we take for granted today.

Capitalism.

Someone wanting to get RICH, and changed the world in the process.

originally posted by: neo96

In the course of answering the question, the president indicated that the "sharp division" between "capitalist and communist or socialist" is starting to blur, and instead of clinging to any one of those ideologies, people should just do what works to create change:

Obama is a moron.

The difference is:

Capitalism there is the chance of a person becoming their own master. The cream of society always rises to the top.

See Gates,Zuckerberg,Jobs, and the list goes on.

You can thank the CAPITALIST for the current level of technological PROGRESS.

Where as the other two socialism, and communism there really is no damn difference,

That state is the master, and the only thing the people do is become a commodity to the collective.

Those lines are not blurred. Some like to think they are.

Every single thing we take for granted today.

Capitalism.

Someone wanting to get RICH, and changed the world in the process.

The chance for a person to become there own master?
Slave to the corporate masters don't you mean.

Regulated Capitalism in which coporations are held to account by the nation and it's people and pay there fair share as well as are only allowed to get SO big then YES but in it's current model absolutely NO - definitely not you are property of the bank's and even your life has a value in financiel term's.

The masters you dream of becoming are no different to the rulers of the Communist empire, they oppress all below them, in an unregulated capitalist society freedom is a commodity, a commodity only the ultra wealthy can afford and of course that means those below can not climb to that height.

There is a reason it was called a DREAM.

Funny how Obama is now buddy-buddy with the hard line commies and dictators of the world now as his term is nearing end. Nothing to worry about as far as re-election goes. First Cuba, then Venezuela, and before that, Iran, which was a gigantic backfire where you give the bully your favorite toy and he knocks you over the head with it and spits on you.

Obama really is the worlds biggest More Ron. The world is really a happy place where communists and capitalists are all the same, that is, until they become dictators and feel the power over others just shows they are far too weak to wield that power without using it immorally against anyone who rubs them the wrong way. Like Obama has already touched upon.

So just imagine what Obama would be doing to people if he was a real dictator and could exercise the full power of one, like in Cuba, or Venezuela. His body count would be way higher, people he made promises to would be in real dire straights, as opposed the "lighter version" they are in now here at home.

Obama is envious of these kinds of people, and has been coached to love them his entire life. It isn't a mystery, but it is a big concern by the massive damage he is doing to the country in so many ways by trying to emulate them.

a reply to: theantediluvian


What does throwing out a definition we are all aware of prove as far as your stance here?

We know you love globalist initiatives as long as you are fooled by Obama and he is the one to push them, but what does that little definition do to prove your argument?