It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sanders is sweeping it in Washington State!!!

page: 6
23
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 07:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: xuenchen

I hope so. I hope you're not just trolling me again.


There you go again.

I made no direct comments about you.

Very dangerous your assumptions are.





posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I know you didn't.- you didn't direct at me personally. Just I started the thread and .... I just don't ever know whether you're being sarcastic/sniping, or you're being sincere.
You might do us all a favor and let us know.

Every post you make seems to include laughy-faces or smiley-faces.....
hard to tell if you're trying to be a "witty wiseguy" or not.


edit on 3/26/2016 by BuzzyWigs because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 08:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: NthOther
Lol. Hawaii and Alaska?

If this was a Republican getting excited about potential wins in states with virtually no electoral significance, you'd be completely dismissive and laughing about it. Social media would erupt with incessant profane descriptions of how unintelligent the candidate and his campaign staff are.



Like the electoral significance of many of Hillary's wins having come from red states that are in no way going to vote for her come the general election?



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

The "Red" States have high volume Democrat voting pockets.

Some Red States had close elections in 2012.




posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 08:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: schuyler
I think Bernie is much more of a Norway/Sweden type of socialist than a Cuba/Soviet kind of socialist, but when people criticize "socialism" in general, it's the latter they are thinking of.


He is the Nordic sort of socialist and he's mentioned it a few times. Their single-payer systems, low-cost higher education programs, high degrees of economic freedom are all things that Sanders is proposing and supports.

I mean, the only candidates suggesting we round people up and put them in camps certainly aren't coming for the Dem side.



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 09:20 PM
link   
a reply to: links234

What's Sanders going to do with all these free programs without taking a strong stance against ilegals immigration huh?

What are we suppose to just pay the entire worlds food housing and education?

Bull#.



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 09:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: links234

What's Sanders going to do with all these free programs without taking a strong stance against ilegals immigration huh?

What are we suppose to just pay the entire worlds food housing and education?

Bull#.


Sanders programs pay for themselves. If you've listened to one of the defenses of a border wall right now it's that all of the money is spent on those building the wall, which goes to workers, and back into the economy, and ultimately back into the government coffers through taxes (an argument I have made several times here).

Guess what? Programs like paying for college, giving food to the hungry, and covering medical care do the same thing. It's all about creating labor needs. All money spent on such a thing is budget neutral in the end. The only thing that matters is how long it takes to recover the expense, which is modified by tax rates.
edit on 26-3-2016 by Aazadan because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 09:54 PM
link   
a reply to: MystikMushroom

Yes, let's blame the oil industry instead of the Democrat party's shift towards more federal regulations, nannying, gun regulations, taxing, minority group pandering, and urban-centric interests for the reasons a state that supported 1960's era Democratic policy doesn't support modern progressive policies. Of course it's all about the oil companies! Why would Alaskan.burd@gmail.com worry about the sanctity of their rights and their state's ability to self govern land use and development?



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I think we should all give Bernie the bird!


You made me LOL

I approve



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:25 PM
link   
Sanders would Wipe Trump in the General.



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: burdman30ott6


Then why did you bring Palin into the discussion in the first place?


*sigh*

Because it's relevant. ???????

Okay, let's leave her out of it, and ignore the fact that she's a ditz with a dysfunctional family and a person who can't make up her mind.....she's a clown, and a joke (by my standards). An "also-ran" who ranks right up there with Duck Dynasty Robertson or whoever......

Sorry if I'm out of bounds.


We get it. Palin lives rent-free in your head



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: TaleDawn
Sanders would Wipe Trump in the General.


A 5 year old asking 'Why' and 'How' repeatedly could dismantle Bernie's rhetoric in about 5 minutes.



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:30 PM
link   
New York and California would put CLinton at 1956 out of the 2382 needed

1234 current tally

New York at 247

California at 475

And the we can add the super delegates or not.

Clinton would still win even coming in 'second'.

www.realclearpolitics.com...

Feel free to ignore this.



LOL.



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: TaleDawn
Sanders would Wipe Trump in the General.


In Europe maybe.

Europe is where all failures are successful.


edit on Mar-26-2016 by xuenchen because: . . . _ _ _ . . .



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:42 PM
link   
My caucus location in Tacoma, WA was packed. The basketball auditorium was filled to standing room only. The 1st vote was nearly 4 to 1 for Bernie Sanders.
It was my first causcus; I had a great time meeting some of my "neighbors".

Keep it going Bernie!



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:44 PM
link   
It was an interesting day at the caucuses here for sure. I saw very little Clinton support, mostly just signs. The Sanders support is pretty impressive here.

I'm ok ignoring that the deck is stacked.. you don't stand a chance if you don't


ETA the fact is that no matter how bad this may end for who i voted for, they got me out to my first caucus, got me involved and listening. that's bigger than what most candidates ever get.
edit on 26-3-2016 by Aliquandro because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Teddy916
I cannot believe Sanders is beating Clinton tonight. Hopefully she can bounce back and hit back hard. This is what politics is all about!

Omg! A Clinton supporter?

They do exist.



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: links234

Plus 467 Super delegates to Bernie's 26. So Hillary had 1681 and Bernie had 937 that's actually a 744 delegate difference.
Hillary gained 34 today and Bern is gained 138 bringing the difference down to 640. Still a hugh lead for Hillary.


Problem with that is you're counting super delegates and you shouldn't. You should only be counting pledged delegates but that's the fault of the MSM and they know better but they do it on purpose. Sanders is much much closer to Clinton then you know.



posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:55 PM
link   
a reply to: muse7




posted on Mar, 26 2016 @ 10:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: links234

What's Sanders going to do with all these free programs without taking a strong stance against ilegals immigration huh?

What are we suppose to just pay the entire worlds food housing and education?

Bull#.


They aren't free. They're paid for with tax money. Tax money that comes from a small increase on the country's richest people. You and I wouldn't have our taxes raised at all.




top topics



 
23
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join