It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It appears a Ted Cruz sex scandal is trending on twitter

page: 50
55
<< 47  48  49    51 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 3 2016 @ 06:52 AM
link   
I appreciate that.
And wonder if Abby Martin is drinking heavily now.
Not that it's good. Booze will kill ya every time.
I had a friend, three drinks, zip.
Right off the LaJolla cliffs.
Got broccoli for brains.

a reply to: annabanana

# 614




posted on Apr, 3 2016 @ 12:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills Duh! Maybe you better get a grasp on copyrighted photographers' products. No one gets a Professional Photog's. output without paying something for it. So did the Super Pac Photoshop the G.Q. cover, or did they, as has been intimated, purchase another photo from that same shoot, thirty years ago. You realize that in one of these "shoots" there are hundreds of frames taken. GQ. then picked one that wouldn't overtly offend their readers. If that Super Pac grabbed another unpublished one, then someone had to have paid for it. There will be a record of that payment, for any copyrighted product. If the Cruze campaign paid for, and then gave it to their favorite Super Pac, then that's a violation of Fed. Election Law. Both Trump's wife and G.Q. Magazine will have a record of who photographed her as a teenager. If they deliberately picked one still frame which showed more tush, than Utah's community standards allow, this could land someone in a very large hole. She was only 15 then. Even my son can crunch that Super Pac's photo and tell if it was photo-shopped from the G.Q. magazine's cover. If it was one that the magazine rejected as being too risque' back then, someone should have to answer for distributing "kiddie porn".
This could come down to something very close to the Hulk Hogan, vs. Gawker Court fight. Since Melannia was only a child then, someone else must have signed her model's release. And what was their understanding with the Photographer, about what could even be distributed?? We're talking about a meeting of the minds about existing morality laws from thirty years ago, here. One things for sure, and that's this Super Pac wasn't trying to sell mouthwash in Utah, by using this old photograph. Gawker wasn't trying to peddle Hulk proof bed sheets, either. And just look where that one's ended up.



posted on Apr, 4 2016 @ 07:02 PM
link   


Trump Campaign Releases “PROOF” This CNN Pundit Slept With Ted Cruz – WOW!




Ok, far from "proof", but interesting non-the-less.



posted on Apr, 4 2016 @ 07:05 PM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

That has been posted here several times previously, but are you saying that the Trump campaign has now released it?



posted on Apr, 4 2016 @ 07:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: UnBreakable

That has been posted here several times previously, but are you saying that the Trump campaign has now released it?


I'm just quoting the source, not that I can vouch for it's veracity.
www.usainfobox.com...



posted on Apr, 4 2016 @ 08:00 PM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

Thanks, very interesting - it is indeed on Scavino's twitter. Since March 28th.
It is even more interesting that Cruz and the media have been mum about this.
Amanda responded on twitter, but weakly.
If it were false, I think they might be throwing a fit about it. Instead they seem to be mostly avoiding it.



posted on Apr, 4 2016 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah


I'm now convinced the media is going to "avoid" the entire episode until after the convention.


Once that's out of the way, everything discussed in this thread will be "discovered" and go national to destroy Cruz.


Any takers?



posted on Apr, 4 2016 @ 08:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

This pundit has it figured out. The GOP establishment is using Cruz to drop Trump...and then they plan to destroy Cruz.
I believe the Cruz sex scandal material...collected by Rubio and the GOP establishment...was supposed to be held in reserve until Cruz stopped Trump from getting 1237. Kasich was told to stay in in order to hold Cruz back from 1237.
THEN ALL the Cruz material was to be leaked before the convention to keep Cruz from claiming the nomination.

Somehow the sex scandal story got leaked out too early.



Pat Caddell: GOP Establishment ‘Using Cruz as Cats-Paw’ to ‘Nominate an Establishment Figure’




Caddell said he believes the GOP Establishment is “using Cruz as a cats-paw.”

“Look, you don’t really think that Jeb Bush, and Lindsay Graham, and some of those who have endorsed Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) … you don’t really think they want Ted Cruz, do you?” Caddell asked. “They’re using him to stop Trump.”

www.breitbart.com...



I like pat, he's pretty good for a dem.

What's he always looking at off camera?



posted on Apr, 5 2016 @ 11:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: carpooler
a reply to: Swills Duh! Maybe you better get a grasp on copyrighted photographers' products. No one gets a Professional Photog's. output without paying something for it. So did the Super Pac Photoshop the G.Q. cover, or did they, as has been intimated, purchase another photo from that same shoot, thirty years ago. You realize that in one of these "shoots" there are hundreds of frames taken. GQ. then picked one that wouldn't overtly offend their readers. If that Super Pac grabbed another unpublished one, then someone had to have paid for it. There will be a record of that payment, for any copyrighted product. If the Cruze campaign paid for, and then gave it to their favorite Super Pac, then that's a violation of Fed. Election Law. Both Trump's wife and G.Q. Magazine will have a record of who photographed her as a teenager. If they deliberately picked one still frame which showed more tush, than Utah's community standards allow, this could land someone in a very large hole. She was only 15 then. Even my son can crunch that Super Pac's photo and tell if it was photo-shopped from the G.Q. magazine's cover. If it was one that the magazine rejected as being too risque' back then, someone should have to answer for distributing "kiddie porn".
This could come down to something very close to the Hulk Hogan, vs. Gawker Court fight. Since Melannia was only a child then, someone else must have signed her model's release. And what was their understanding with the Photographer, about what could even be distributed?? We're talking about a meeting of the minds about existing morality laws from thirty years ago, here. One things for sure, and that's this Super Pac wasn't trying to sell mouthwash in Utah, by using this old photograph. Gawker wasn't trying to peddle Hulk proof bed sheets, either. And just look where that one's ended up.



i think it's pretty certain Cruz was involved - Trump has openly said he was and Cruz has not tried to deny it. Doubt he wants it to push it because the truth will come out, because as you said there are bound to be records floating about.
edit on 5/4/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 6 2016 @ 04:44 AM
link   
I hope Trump raises it at the next live event..
waits until Cruz think's the topic has fallen of the radar then !!BOOM!! quick left hook question leaving Cruz speechless , guilty and stuck on camera



posted on Apr, 6 2016 @ 07:16 PM
link   
There seems to be another NE story coming up linking Cruz to the DC Madam telephone records....


edit on 6/4/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 7 2016 @ 05:55 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 7 2016 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

So...Anthony Noto is the CFO of Twitter. He left Goldman Sachs in 2014 to take the job. That means Heidi Cruz worked with him for years.

What a strange coincidence it is so suppressed on Twitter.



posted on Apr, 7 2016 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: BarefootInWinter

Now THAT IS a real coincidence.



posted on Apr, 7 2016 @ 09:02 PM
link   
a reply to: BarefootInWinter

I think someone should tweet this #cruzsexscandal



posted on Apr, 7 2016 @ 09:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
I hope Trump raises it at the next live event..
waits until Cruz think's the topic has fallen of the radar then !!BOOM!! quick left hook question leaving Cruz speechless , guilty and stuck on camera


That would be great. Cruz is demanding a debate with Trump. Cruz, be careful what you wish for.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 01:08 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

I have been, but I'm not big on Twitter. Seeing a few retweets and some new posts from folks not on my followers. I have been mentioning it when I see people say stuff about the censorship or Trending suppression.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 04:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: BarefootInWinter
a reply to: UKTruth

So...Anthony Noto is the CFO of Twitter. He left Goldman Sachs in 2014 to take the job. That means Heidi Cruz worked with him for years.

What a strange coincidence it is so suppressed on Twitter.


That is interesting. Can you imagine if the NE ran a hit piece on Trump? It would be all over the MSM before the ink was dry on the article.



posted on Apr, 8 2016 @ 07:09 AM
link   
That the mediacreatures from hell don't like him is precisely Trump's appeal.

But I watched him during the 'illegal' abortion question follow through.

Mister Trump had no qualms allowing replay after reply which cut out altogether
the fact that they had asked him about illegal abortions, and not about abortions in general.

He did his best to appear as the entitled buddha boy consulting a magic 8 ball
behind his back and then he
twisted his mouth to form 'the answer' pause 'is they should be punished'.

In my opinion he is deliberately scuttling himself. Why I don't know exactly,
but before they kill you they will sometimes offer money. In any event he has no balls.

I think it'd be great if he got elected anyway, just based on media hatred by the revolting masses.
Then he can get to work making amerika great again. God knows we need it and I can't see Cruz or Hillary doing anything good.
Trump would probably be constructive just by force of habit, and I don't care if he screws around.

I think outlawing digital power meters would be a good start. I am being fried by the spiked Hz values.
No more continuous 60 Hz waves. Nope. Up to 50,000 cycles per second, and it kicks in the second
you close your eyes and it reads that you are trying to sleep. I could scream but who's listening?
Those things can read the human aura, and interfere with biological magnetic fields, such as the one encompassing your heart.
My brain was swimming like a Pharoah's last night, wave after wave of delight in my sinus, it took me an hour or more to sense this, a lifetime to cultivate the ability to receive such gifts, a rare, few times in my lifetime experience. I was engulfed with
the feeling I might levitate, electric and natural, wave after wave of pure analog pussy rippled through my skull, and then a loud cracking
sound behind me in the air and everything ceased, because the digital meter sensed I grew some long hairs, again, and the surge protector clacked and tried to reconnect after being automatically dismantled by the meter. Ended, with the summary redirection of a few transistors and perhaps a diode. The electrician would have me committed if I breathed a word of this; it too would make him uncomfortable. It's not as if he has tits or anything I could use, so why risk it? But it is idiopathic genocide.
Except now we know.
But don't take my word for it. Maybe ask Bloomberg. He majored in electrical engineering.

Am I off topic? I think not. Stealth Technofascism is of paramount concern to everyone, especially to the uninformed.
Consider yourself now informed. You reading this are the last set of eyes to know.
Death to them and the whores they rode in on. And I mean that.

a reply to: UKTruth

# 617


edit on 8-4-2016 by TheWhiteKnight because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-4-2016 by TheWhiteKnight because: change is coming and it cannot be too soon

edit on 8-4-2016 by TheWhiteKnight because: oh, another one near Bern

edit on 8-4-2016 by TheWhiteKnight because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-4-2016 by TheWhiteKnight because: when they come to replace your 'smart' meter demand one that is pure analog. If is has digital fonts, it ain't analog. They screwed us twice now.



posted on Apr, 27 2016 @ 10:17 AM
link   
A month later Amanda is still on CNN making pro-Cruz comments, many are totally unrealistic wishful fantasy comments, I so wish she would have been busted on this and lost her job with CNN. I know another would have just taken her place, but you know her history with Cruz every comment she makes on CNN actually sickens me.

I think at the very least she had a Monica/Clinton type event with Cruz.
edit on 27-4-2016 by Blue_Jay33 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
55
<< 47  48  49    51 >>

log in

join