It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Clinton & Sanders both in LA. Clinton fundraiser $250 per person. Sanders free rally.

page: 1
18
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 12:41 AM
link   
Hillary Clinton Returns for L.A. Fundraising


MARCH 24, 2016

Hillary Clinton mingled with Hollywood figures at an afternoon reception at the Santa Monica home of ICM Partners’ Chris Silbermann and his wife Julia Franz, one of two fundraisers on Thursday as her campaign taps Los Angeles donors.

Thursday evening, Clinton will appear at the Hollywood nightclub Avalon for another fundraiser, and will be making a guest spot on “Jimmy Kimmel Live.”

About 150 guests attended the Silbermann event, where tickets were $2,700 per person.

“I have deep admiration for Secretary Clinton,” Silbermann said in a statement. “I am proud to support her as our next President alongside my family and friends as we approach one of the most significant elections of our lifetime.”

The Avalon nightclub event was aimed at a younger crowd, with tickets starting at $250 per person. Ben Harper, Estelle and Mary J. Blige were scheduled to perform, and Russell Simmons was the emcee.


Bernie Sanders in LA: Democratic hopeful ramps up his campaign in California


MARCH 25, 2016 | 06:03PM PT

Bernie Sanders’ latest California rally was thrown together in less than 24 hours, after bad weather forced him to cancel a planned campaign trip to Wyoming. But the event at the Wiltern theatre in Los Angeles was nonetheless a sell-out, with an overflow line stretching all the way down the block outside.

The Wiltern is more accustomed to hosting bands than presidential candidates, but the Vermont Senator received a rock star’s welcome. “We can argue about whether Vermont is more progressive than California,” he said as the cheers died down. “But I feel very comfortable here tonight.” Which is lucky, he might as well have added, since he’ll soon be spending a lot of time in the Golden State.


Both of them in California campaigning but one caters to the wealthy while the other goes to the people, free of charge! Reports are there was one arrest, a topless Bernie supporter. Oh Cali, you liberal state you! Sanders needs to win California and win it big and things are looking good if these Californian rally's are any indication.

I can't believe Russell Simmons supports Clinton over Sanders. So disappointing.
edit on 25-3-2016 by Swills because: (no reason given)



(post by FlyingFox removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 12:53 AM
link   


No negative press about Hillary. The Clinton Machine has sycophants that will track you down. That or Progressive Ninjas. Either way, your screwed.

edit on 2882016512016-03-25T00:54:51-05:0020165am511254 by Boscowashisnamo because: none given.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 12:57 AM
link   
a reply to: FlyingFox

Keep knocking Sanders and his supporters, if you fear Shillary, they are your only chance.

How do make sure Shillary becomes president while simultaneously destroying the republican party?

Put an obnoxious celebrity up who can rally the more extreme aspects of said party and watch as the media convinces people that he is "anti-establishment" and wants to "make america great again" lol! I can not believe this lunacy works!

Shillary and Trump work for the CFR and the same elite scum that has destroyed the country, celebrate your options!



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 12:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: FlyingFox
[snipped]


You mean most of his supporters are the kids graduating college with the realization they have been lied too and ripped off?
edit on 3.25.2016 by Kandinsky because: snipped quote of removed post



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:23 AM
link   
a reply to: FlyingFox

Yeah, that's a fair generalization. If you support Sanders you collect welfare.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Boscowashisnamo

Well, if that's the case then there are two regular ATS'ers who better watch their backs!



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:25 AM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

He does have a lock with the youth. No one comes close to his support in the 18-35 demographic.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

That says it all - Hillary, who knows exactly what difference it makes, engages 'it's not what you know it's who you know" in tinsel towns Hollyweird and charges $250 for the honor of listening to her dribble sh!t, Bernie on the other hand puts the invite out to everyone to come and listen to what he has to say - free of charge.

Which one do you reckon is a better choice, it ain't rocket science innit?



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

You would think but yet people still don't support him and would rather see her take the nomination. Amazing, right?



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Sublimecraft

You would think but yet people still don't support him and would rather see her take the nomination. Amazing, right?

Agreed - if she wins, I come to only one of two conclusions:

1. It lends credence to the Mandela Effect theory of an alternate reality / timeline because it's clearly where all the millions of Hillary supporters live as I can only count a hand-full here, on this plane of existence.

2. The whole shebang is rigged, from start to finish.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Endless war. Wall Street welfare. Elite welfare. More paid speeches. More of the same, really.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:47 AM
link   
The title of this thread epitomizes my view on the two candidates.

"For the money"

"For the People"

Hmmm... I wonder which one I would choose? Right! The one who's for the people!

If I was American, I would vote sanders.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:56 AM
link   
It epitomizes liberal views on both accounts...

Clinton, the Teflon Don of politics is DEEPLY entrenched in the corporate world... she aims to profit at the expense of others.

Sanders charges nothing up front, but will expect everyone else to pay for the party when it is over.
edit on 25-3-2016 by madmac5150 because: I bought a vowel.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 02:01 AM
link   
a reply to: madmac5150

What an untrue thing to say. Sanders expects who to pay for what? His campaign obviously paid for the venue and didn't charge people when the rally was over.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 02:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

More than that!!

I've certainly made no secret of my utter disdain of the evil One.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 02:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: madmac5150

What an untrue thing to say. Sanders expects who to pay for what? His campaign obviously paid for the venue and didn't charge people when the rally was over.


No, it is a very accurate statement when dealing with an avowed socialist. He promises free college educations for all, living wages, etc. etc. yet, he has NO plan to pay for any of these programs.

The party gets thrown, and we are left picking up the tab.

I stand on my metaphor... and raise you on sarcasm...



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 03:58 AM
link   


Which one do you reckon is a better choice, it ain't rocket science innit?
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Unfortunately, a majority of Americans have a tough time seeing that. The bad word "Socialism" clouds their thinking.

edit on 25-3-2016 by WeRpeons because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 04:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills



I can't believe Russell Simmons supports Clinton over Sanders. So disappointing.


Don't forget that Russell Simmons is uber rich. Not sure how accurate this website is, but it claims his net worth is $340 million (here). So if you look at it from that perspective, it makes sense.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 04:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: madmac5150
No, it is a very accurate statement when dealing with an avowed socialist. He promises free college educations for all, living wages, etc. etc. yet, he has NO plan to pay for any of these programs.


No, it's not an accurate statement at all. He's not promising anything but he is telling you what he'd like to accomplish. Also, he does have a Plan on how to pay for these programs. You simply disagree with his plan or have decided not to read about what his plan is and instead just claim that he doesn't have one. But he does. In fact he's the only one so far that does have a plan about anything he says he'd like to do.

If you disagree with it, fine, that's your choice. But it's not true to say he has NO Plan.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<<   2 >>

log in

join