It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
The dynamics of quantum/energy. You see the dynamics of consciousness is quantum and consciousness causes reality. In the vedic model, the human being has many bodies, including an energy body and the physical causes and conditions are caused by the state of his energy body. Hence, there is a direction connection between mind and the physical. Aging, is a physical process, and by meditation, the process can be controlled.
I have heard that the experts in meditation can even stop their heart beat and cause warmth or cold.
[edit on 11-3-2005 by Indigo_Child]
Originally posted by bpletcj
I also believe in levitation, Astral Projection and telekinesis.
I am not talking about parlor tricks you see either.
The only public figure I am on the fence on is David Blaine, any one think his routine is genuine?
Tibetan monks would spend time alone in mountain caves above the snowline, and practice using their heat by standing under a waterfall, then soaking blankets in the near zero degree water, and then wrapping themselves in them one at a time, and drying them.
Also, I have read of yogi's making one hand 5 degrees F hotter than the other on command, and lowering their pulse to 16 bpm.
Of course, for those like me who believe in it, some have also levitated.
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
Originally posted by bpletcj
I also believe in levitation, Astral Projection and telekinesis.
I am not talking about parlor tricks you see either.
The only public figure I am on the fence on is David Blaine, any one think his routine is genuine?
I do, why not?
those people he was with seemed together and sincere, and also, i have seen copperfield live 3 times.
Originally posted by surfup
Originally posted by el_illumbrato
im only up to page 6 of reading this thread and the links, but its just been bought to my attention that the photo NASA took of the bridge connecting Bharata (India) and Sri Lanka was apparently a fake as in NASA denied releasing it
so not sure what that means. Maybe it was leaked from NASA and they are trying to cover it up? Or maybe it was fake. I am starting Sanskrit Lessons on Sunday at the Bhaktivedanta Mandhir in Watford
You mean Adam's bridge? I don't think I saw any articles from NASA, but I did see couple of Indian websites posting pictures, supposedly gotten from NASA.
Here is a link to Columbia Encyclopedia, and this site looks legit to me.
www.bartleby.com...
P.S. I don't believe that the bridge was constructed by Rama or Hanuman, but I do believe that the bridge was man made.
Surf
Am i wrong or was that physicist mistaken? I think it was a fairly recent interview though. It was with Dr Michio Kaku, that guy who wrote Hyperspace all about string theory and alternative universes, time travel etc.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
At that time it was called Santana dharma which means the true duty
Originally posted by GArnold
I must be confused here.. but NO where do I see absoulute proof of anything in these posts and I tend to believe things like this. The proof that is talked about is anything but absoulute... its speculation at best based on things that were "written" well over a thousand years ago! How exactly is that proof of anything?
Maybe if one of these fantastic machines had actually been found or uncovered etc... but nothing of the sort has happened.
Originally posted by VaporTrail Please look up Zachariah Sitchin www.sitchin.com...
Originally posted by el_illumbrato
yes thats the one which i meant. the only picture i have seen of adam's bridge aka Rama's bridge is the one posted by indigo at the beginning of this thread. And it does look very realistic to me, but like i said, i heard from a hare Krishna follower that the photo had been denied by NASA as being genuine.
Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by VaporTrail Please look up Zachariah Sitchin www.sitchin.com...
Speaking as someone who CAN read some of the cuneiform texts, Sitchin is mistranslating the texts. You wouldn't know it unless you got books from the library and started looking at the material and learning the languages.
He's not very reliable. For material on ancient civilizations, try Wikipedia...there's some fantastic stuff there!
~snip
Have you ever looked into the mechanism that is called the Antikythera device?
www.world-mysteries.com...
It is an odd one.
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
Originally posted by Byrd
I am impressed that you can read some cuneiform, very admirable in my view.
I read it VERY very poorly, with dictionaries in hand and a lot of peering and headaches to make out the letters. But I can confirm things like where Sitchin reads "android" that it actually says "human" and that this consistant word meaning "human" (not android) appears in other things that have nothing to do with the Enumma Elish.
I have not read a Sitchin book through, but have certainly read numerous books by fans of his. He may be misreading, or he may just be interpreting the texts from a different perspective. I have done that with the bible, and some would say I am misinterpreting the texts that I take to mean different than the norm.
No, he misinterprets them and doesn't seem to have a lot of in-depth information about the civilization. I suspect he's actually reading translations and is not doing direct translations himself.
The famous "Nibiru" is very obviously a throne name for Marduk, for instance (a title like "King of kings" or "lord of lord" or "lord high protector" is a throne name, and the Sumerians had long long lists of throne names by which a god/king was addressed.) There is no way it can be a planet -- but Sithcin is stuck with this and keeps making his translations even more absurd to fit this first false translation.
Have you ever looked into the mechanism that is called the Antikythera device?
www.world-mysteries.com...
It is an odd one.
Actually, thanks to folks here, I *have*! I initially was skeptical until I saw that it was dated to about 200 BC and saw some decent papers on it confirmig its reality.