It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Clinton Email Scandal: Here’s One Thing Hillary Was Trying To Hide (editorial)

page: 1
22
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 05:42 AM
link   
Clinton Email Scandal: Here’s One Thing Hillary Was Trying To Hide


Corruption: Newly released documents reveal part of what Hillary Clinton was hoping to hide by using a personal email account for official government business. With the Clintons, it’s all about building an empire.

Judicial Watch released 276 documents Tuesday that had been obtained through one of its Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. Among the material are emails that show the State Department under Clinton was coordinating with the Clinton Foundation staff and how foreign governments sought favor through the intertwined State Department-Clinton Foundation link.

As we’ve said before, it looks as if Clinton used her job at the State Department to funnel cash into her family’s nonprofit organization.

The latest batch of emails shows that foreign interests in Libya and Syria were among the many that took advantage of the State’s close ties to the Clinton Foundation. It was previously discovered that governments in Algeria, Kuwait, Qatar and Oman made donations to the foundation in return for, as far as we can tell, favorable treatment by the State Department.

Judicial Watch reminds us that the Clinton Foundation has “accepted millions of dollars from at least seven foreign governments while Mrs. Clinton served as secretary of state,” including “a $500,000 donation it received from the government of Algeria while Mrs. Clinton served as secretary of state (that) violated a 2008 ethics agreement between the foundation and the Obama administration.”


Click link for remainder of op-ed.

Its looking like Clinton's problems are now getting worse now that new emails are showing a link between Clinton, foreign countries and donations to the Clinton foundation. The fact she was wheeling and dealing 2 days after the Libyan attacks with a member of the Libyan national Congress about donations to the Clinton foundation instead of dealing with 4 dead Americans says a lot about her ethics and lack of them.

I am waiting for the other shoe to drop with former President Clinton and his participation and if any criminal wrongdoing occurred. If she becomes President I see secrets and access being sold to the highest bidders.

If the DOJ opts not to prosecute and its based on political considerations I think the Democratic party is done for a while.

As a reminder, this is an op-ed article.


* - Judicial Watch
edit on 24-3-2016 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 05:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra


As we’ve said before, it looks as if Clinton used her job at the State Department to funnel cash into her family’s nonprofit organization.

You don't really think she (or any politician for that matter) is really about spreading democracy and humanitarian aid, do you? Its always about the friggin money, power and control of territory, people and resources.
The whole US government is being covered for by keeping our noses buried in Hillarys uh, (ahem) 'server'.


+4 more 
posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 07:16 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

All the more reason her arse needs to be in a prison and not in the Oval office.

If she walks free, America has bigger problems than ISIS!



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 07:19 AM
link   
.......... but she'll still be elected (or selected) POTUS in November.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 07:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

It is an op-ed piece, but there still are those pesky facts.
- Like the fact that the emails of the Clinton Foundation have been subpoenaed (there is an investigation going on and it relates to corruption).
- Cheryl Mills sent classified information to the Clinton Foundation while she worked at the State Department.

Why would the State Department send classified information to the Clinton Foundation?
There is the possibility that the Clinton Foundation was using that information to shake down foreign governments for 'contributions'. There are already indications that there was a 'pay to play' thing going on between State Department, the Clinton Foundation and foreign governments.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 09:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Already been posted. It's garbage. But thanks for checking g before bringing it to us a second time.

www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 3242016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 09:21 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

The investigation going on relates to security not corruption.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 09:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Clinton Email Scandal: Here’s One Thing Hillary Was Trying To Hide


Corruption: Newly released documents reveal part of what Hillary Clinton was hoping to hide by using a personal email account for official government business. With the Clintons, it’s all about building an empire.

Judicial Watch released 276 documents Tuesday that had been obtained through one of its Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. Among the material are emails that show the State Department under Clinton was coordinating with the Clinton Foundation staff and how foreign governments sought favor through the intertwined State Department-Clinton Foundation link.

As we’ve said before, it looks as if Clinton used her job at the State Department to funnel cash into her family’s nonprofit organization.

The latest batch of emails shows that foreign interests in Libya and Syria were among the many that took advantage of the State’s close ties to the Clinton Foundation. It was previously discovered that governments in Algeria, Kuwait, Qatar and Oman made donations to the foundation in return for, as far as we can tell, favorable treatment by the State Department.

Judicial Watch reminds us that the Clinton Foundation has “accepted millions of dollars from at least seven foreign governments while Mrs. Clinton served as secretary of state,” including “a $500,000 donation it received from the government of Algeria while Mrs. Clinton served as secretary of state (that) violated a 2008 ethics agreement between the foundation and the Obama administration.”


Click link for remainder of op-ed.

Its looking like Clinton's problems are now getting worse now that new emails are showing a link between Clinton, foreign countries and donations to the Clinton foundation. The fact she was wheeling and dealing 2 days after the Libyan attacks with a member of the Libyan national Congress about donations to the Clinton foundation instead of dealing with 4 dead Americans says a lot about her ethics and lack of them.

I am waiting for the other shoe to drop with former President Clinton and his participation and if any criminal wrongdoing occurred. If she becomes President I see secrets and access being sold to the highest bidders.

If the DOJ opts not to prosecute and its based on political considerations I think the Democratic party is done for a while.

As a reminder, this is an op-ed article.


* - Judicial Watch


This is basically what I was talking about in other threads. I expected she was giving financial "aid" (read payoffs) to foreign politicians and despots) and they were donating a percentage back to the Clinton Foundation. It seemed so blatantly obvious LOL. 6 billion or so UP in the Clinton Foundation and 6 billion plus MISSING in the state department. Doesn't seem hard to connect the dots...

Cheers - Dave
edit on 3/24.2016 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 09:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy

The investigation going on relates to security not corruption.


But security breaches are a form of corruption.

The Hillary Clinton for President Campaign said so.




posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 10:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

Already been posted. It's garbage. But thanks for checking g before bringing it to us a second time.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


and since they dont have the same title it comes back negative when you search.

Its not garbage.

I'll refrain from coming down to your level.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy

The investigation going on relates to security not corruption.

It is a corruption probe.
By the FBI and the State Department Inspector General.
FOX News



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 10:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

Already been posted. It's garbage. But thanks for checking g before bringing it to us a second time.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


and since they dont have the same title it comes back negative when you search.

Its not garbage.

I'll refrain from coming down to your level.

That is the latest method for the Hillary supporters are using to discredit real information.
The same member used this phrase to describe the truth yesterday:

Reviewed their content and dismissed them as bovine crap in a steaming pile.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 11:00 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

You have to find it ironic that you speak of "real information", yet post a link to Fox News in which they make a claim based on "three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News."



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 11:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: intrptr

All the more reason her arse needs to be in a prison and not in the Oval office.

If she walks free, America has bigger problems than ISIS!

Walks free? They protect her from the highest pinnacles. They're going to place her in the highest office.

That is more obvious to people here, ATS members actually look a little closer at the real world cake, not just the decorations.

Arrest warrants issued for Bush and Obama for crimes against Humanity



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 11:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: butcherguy

You have to find it ironic that you speak of "real information", yet post a link to Fox News in which they make a claim based on "three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News."

That is right....
When did we learn the identity of 'Deep Throat'?
Did we ever learn his identity?
Deep Throat was the unnamed source of Woodward and Bernstein that broke the Watergate Scandal wide open.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 12:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: butcherguy

You have to find it ironic that you speak of "real information", yet post a link to Fox News in which they make a claim based on "three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News."

That is right....
When did we learn the identity of 'Deep Throat'?
Did we ever learn his identity?
Deep Throat was the unnamed source of Woodward and Bernstein that broke the Watergate Scandal wide open.


That is possible, but still not even close to be considered "real information". It's hearsay from a media source known to be questionable in their ability to tell the truth.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: butcherguy

You have to find it ironic that you speak of "real information", yet post a link to Fox News in which they make a claim based on "three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News."

That is right....
When did we learn the identity of 'Deep Throat'?
Did we ever learn his identity?
Deep Throat was the unnamed source of Woodward and Bernstein that broke the Watergate Scandal wide open.


That is possible, but still not even close to be considered "real information". It's hearsay from a media source known to be questionable in their ability to tell the truth.

Catherine Herridge?
Here is her bio on Wikipedia: Link
I see no disputes with her reporting.

Now you would probably accept 'Dateline NBC' as a source..... Google search that name.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Name one single news agency that'll even call her on it.

She's the Chosen One.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

You misunderstand.

It is possible that these anonymous Fox sources could break open a Hillary scandal, but Fox cannot be trusted as they have a problem telling the truth. They could be making this story up for all we know.

That is why it is laughable that you say some about real information, yet post a story from Fox with absolutely no sources.

Catherine Herridge could be telling the truth, or she may not be. Also, she is not the only one that contributed to that piece.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 12:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: butcherguy

You misunderstand.

It is possible that these anonymous Fox sources could break open a Hillary scandal, but Fox cannot be trusted as they have a problem telling the truth. They could be making this story up for all we know.

That is why it is laughable that you say some about real information, yet post a story from Fox with absolutely no sources.

Catherine Herridge could be telling the truth, or she may not be. Also, she is not the only one that contributed to that piece.

What is laughable is that you are bringing info from two different posts to make your point.
You do know that you did that, right?
What I said, in the post that said nothing of FOX News, was this:



That is the latest method for the Hillary supporters are using to discredit real information.

I was referring to what the member said and how the same member used it when I was giving them real information... in another thread. I didn't want to point out that you are misunderstanding the whole thing, but I feel that I need to now.

edit on b000000312016-03-24T12:56:39-05:0012America/ChicagoThu, 24 Mar 2016 12:56:39 -05001200000016 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
22
<<   2 >>

log in

join