It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: nonspecific
A first world economy can not grow or thrive if it's infrastructure is failing apart or full to capacity.
It boring but roads and rail networks are the viens and arterys of this country and right now those viens and arterys are clogged.
And this has nothing to do with your need to get to and from work cheaply and effectively I suppose?
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: nonspecific
A first world economy can not grow or thrive if it's infrastructure is failing apart or full to capacity.
It boring but roads and rail networks are the viens and arterys of this country and right now those viens and arterys are clogged.
And this has nothing to do with your need to get to and from work cheaply and effectively I suppose?
I would say yes and that is a HUGE part of the problem.
If cost of travel in sky high it increases costs all round from food prices to your electric bills.
originally posted by: angryhulk
a reply to: nonspecific
I think we will need all the money for potholes alone.
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: nonspecific
A first world economy can not grow or thrive if it's infrastructure is failing apart or full to capacity.
It boring but roads and rail networks are the viens and arterys of this country and right now those viens and arterys are clogged.
And this has nothing to do with your need to get to and from work cheaply and effectively I suppose?
I would say yes and that is a HUGE part of the problem.
If cost of travel in sky high it increases costs all round from food prices to your electric bills.
I agree on the food but how does it affect electric prices?
The real reason energy bills are high
Expensive projects designed to slash our reliance on fossil fuels are disproportionately driving up bills compared to other countries, experts say.
The £11bn "smart meter" project, which aims to digitise every gas and electricity meter, is just one example. The Government insists the plan to install a smart meter in every home, funded by bill payers, will cut energy consumption by changing people's behaviour.
originally posted by: paraphi
To be fair, £8 bln is small change to the UK. Oh, it's a lot of money, but small change none-the-less.
What could £8bln buy infrastructure-wise?
A third runway at Heathrow costs c. £15 bln.
High Speed rail is £50bln.
Filling in existing potholes £15 bln.
On the other hand... Tax owed by those trendy global concerns (Facebook, Apple, Starbucks, Costa, Google et al) £398 trillion!
Best sort out corporate tax dodgers and stay in Europe if you ask me!
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: nonspecific
A first world economy can not grow or thrive if it's infrastructure is failing apart or full to capacity.
It boring but roads and rail networks are the viens and arterys of this country and right now those viens and arterys are clogged.
And this has nothing to do with your need to get to and from work cheaply and effectively I suppose?
I would say yes and that is a HUGE part of the problem.
If cost of travel in sky high it increases costs all round from food prices to your electric bills.
I agree on the food but how does it affect electric prices?
Electric does not appear by magic.
Coal, oil, fuel rods ect need to be transported.
Workers need to get to work and if 25% income goes on travel they need higher wages.
Spare parts need to be delivered
Ect
EVERYTHING is affected by our roads, rail, sea ports and airports ability to cope with the use.
And there is indirect cost.
If 25% of my income is going on travel to oil company's ect that's thousands less being spent on consumer goods.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: nonspecific
I think your missing the overall point.
Roads, trains, ports and airports are life blood of the UK.
They need a huge renovation.
We can't have a 2020 economy with 1980,s transport
And yes it seems boring but everyone will benifit in some way be it cheaper food or cheaper travel or businesses spending less on transport freeing up for money for JOBS.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: nonspecific
A first world economy can not grow or thrive if it's infrastructure is failing apart or full to capacity.
It boring but roads and rail networks are the viens and arterys of this country and right now those viens and arterys are clogged.
And this has nothing to do with your need to get to and from work cheaply and effectively I suppose?
I would say yes and that is a HUGE part of the problem.
If cost of travel in sky high it increases costs all round from food prices to your electric bills.
I agree on the food but how does it affect electric prices?
Electric does not appear by magic.
Coal, oil, fuel rods ect need to be transported.
Workers need to get to work and if 25% income goes on travel they need higher wages.
Spare parts need to be delivered
Ect
EVERYTHING is affected by our roads, rail, sea ports and airports ability to cope with the use.
And there is indirect cost.
If 25% of my income is going on travel to oil company's ect that's thousands less being spent on consumer goods.
Brexit would cause 'electric shock' for energy costs, warns Amber Rudd
Addressing employees at an energy interconnector site in Kent – chosen to highlight Britain’s relationship and interdependence with the EU – Rudd said the EU had been instrumental in keeping energy bills low, and that it was necessary to ‘work with our neighbours to deliver energy security in the future’.
“The UK’s membership of the European Union has helped keep our energy bills down,” Rudd said. “If we left the European Internal Market, we’d get a massive electric shock because UK energy costs are likely to rocket by at least half a billion pounds a year – the equivalent of British bills going up by around one and a half million pounds each and every day.
“By 2030, even if we develop the potential of UK shale gas, we are expected to import about three quarters of our gas. In other words, we will have to continue to work with our closest neighbours to deliver energy security in the future. An internal energy market helps to guarantee our energy security, which is the bedrock of our economic security. I’m not willing to play fast and loose with either.”
originally posted by: anxiouswens
Lots of champagne and big street parties!
Back in the land of reality we could sure do with helping NHS, struggling schools, building houses, helping small businesses, helping our young with more opportunities for those who want to start up businesses, training more GPs, nurses, doctors, much needed for research, science and innovation, money to go into small towns with high unemployment and poverty. The list goes on and on.a reply to: nonspecific
originally posted by: anxiouswens
Oh go on then thats what we should do. I will just be happy to be free from the madness that is the EU. I will be able to have light in my life literally (100 watt bulbs heaven). On a more serious note I dont think the savings will be that great it will be like having a rise at work and then being no better off because just go out and buy a better car or house.
I know the economy is important but I think most people who want to leave are already realistic that there may be a few tough years. However, any mistakes or downfalls will be OURS and not because of someone we havent even voted for telling us what is best for us. In that respect I wouldnt care if we made no savings. a reply to: nonspecific