It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: namelesss
No, I am not.
To positively offer an assertion, such as that there is no God, in a philosophic discussion, requires positive philosophic, logical, scientific, evidentiary support!
originally posted by: namelesss
That there is none, nor can there be, such positive assertion must be the symptom of a 'belief'.
originally posted by: namelesss
But in this case it must, because the reason that one cannot 'prove' that something does not exist, is because everything exists! *__-
originally posted by: namelesss
Again, I was careful to point out "The sect of atheists who assert that "there is no God"", just in case there is something of which I am unaware....
originally posted by: namelesss
An atheist doesn't need to directly state "there is no god".
Hence my "The sect of atheists who assert that "there is no God""!
originally posted by: namelesss
If there is an 'atheist' who says; I have no idea, and if new info arrives, I will revise my position of ignorance (the only honest intellectual position), then he is, I thought, an agnostic!
"I had a rather drastic shock last Tuesday [18th], at approximately half past five in the Periodicals Room of the History Faculty Library. I was musing on the fact that my philosophical and political opinions are all becoming very amoral... I’ve already come to realise that my philosophy, taken in the abstract, leads to the destruction of all morality. I think it is a fact of observation that I have any morality at all only because it suits me, and I am forced to recognise that religious people are right in thinking that religious belief is necessary for the bonds of society. If everyone else reached my position, not all of them would hold it in their interests to abide by the rules."
originally posted by: DISRAELI
OK, here is the candid opinion of a self-observant young atheist, as reocrded in his diary at the time;
"I had a rather drastic shock last Tuesday [18th], at approximately half past five in the Periodicals Room of the History Faculty Library. I was musing on the fact that my philosophical and political opinions are all becoming very amoral... I’ve already come to realise that my philosophy, taken in the abstract, leads to the destruction of all morality. I think it is a fact of observation that I have any morality at all only because it suits me, and I am forced to recognise that religious people are right in thinking that religious belief is necessary for the bonds of society. If everyone else reached my position, not all of them would hold it in their interests to abide by the rules. "
I was that young atheist. The "drastic shock" was another pyschological self-observation not relevant to this topic.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: Ghost147
At keast the subjective observations of an atheist are some sort of evidence about the way atheists think, as distinct from the speculations of outsiders.
The research is based on the hypothesis that the human brain has two opposing domains in constant tension.
My personal opinion.... a psychopath morals are not based upon one's belief's but I can see an atheist having less empathy than a believer.
Would you agree?
Due to my cultural upbringing, I have been able to self define my own version, because I must in order to fit in, of what constitutes "God". It is, the total of everything that arises naturally, as well as everything that doesn't, from the universe, which IS God.
There! Am I a theist?
I think you could clarify by saying you don't believe the religious explanation of God. Wheras the discussion philosophically of a first cause, designer that could be dead etc are possible. That really is an agnostic atheist position. Some atheist actively claim that God is not possible. Which is a strong atheist position. As would saying no God exists which is your first statement.
Point really is labels are dumb. I call myself an atheist as rough guideline to say I am not a believer of religion or a supernatural being that interacts with people. I also know I could be wrong. It's metaphysics.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Klassified
I agree completely! When theists tell me "This is God", I say "That's no God."
Due to my cultural upbringing, I have been able to self define my own version, because I must in order to fit in, of what constitutes "God". It is, the total of everything that arises naturally, as well as everything that doesn't, from the universe, which IS God.
There! Am I a theist?
originally posted by: Raxoxane
I know of some Christians who are psychopaths too.Psycho's always suck but more so when they go around all super-superior and smug about being a good Christian while spending their whole lives screwing other people over on a daily basis.I prefer the atheist psycho's.