It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

American injured in Brussels was also at Boston Marathon bombing and in Paris during attacks

page: 2
24
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 05:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: ThePeaceMaker




if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news


Exactly.

Shame many members here can't make that logical step though.

"Zomg teh crises actur!1!"



And why exactly wouldn't it make the news Mr smartass?

The best way of hiding something is in plain sight.. Logic doesn't come into the equation when dealing with these type of agencies..

What's to say the story wouldnt have broken anyway so they release their version first..
Try and think outside the box.




posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 05:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Well technically if his mother wasn't running in the marathon he wouldn't of been there how many other people would of gone to Boston they day to watch people run, them people too didn't really have a reason to be there apart from that they were watching the marathon any other day half of those people would of been there

if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news

I just think a case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time .. 3 times



You have to ask yourself.. Why is a missionary from utah running a marathon across the country in Boston?
Could be valid but then again might not be..

None of this adds up



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 05:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Misterlondon

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: ThePeaceMaker




if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news


Exactly.

Shame many members here can't make that logical step though.

"Zomg teh crises actur!1!"



And why exactly wouldn't it make the news Mr smartass?

The best way of hiding something is in plain sight.. Logic doesn't come into the equation when dealing with these type of agencies..

What's to say the story wouldnt have broken anyway so they release their version first..
Try and think outside the box.


I suppose that they could have assumed that most people would never think that it was reasonable cause to suspect him of being an agent.

Unless they are a conspiracy nut that is and then nobody would believe them anyway.

He is just as likely to be a time traveller from the future observing key terrorist events and just stood a little too close this time.



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 05:58 AM
link   
Oh hiding in plain site is a great way to hide ... But not releasing or giving out any information is even better way of hiding. If this report didn't come to light how many people would of known about this guys bad luck.. No one. Why realease this report and then give everyone the suspicion that he may be CIA, if this happened his cover is already blown

He isn't a CIA operative end of



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 05:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Oh hiding in plain site is a great way to hide ... But not releasing or giving out any information is even better way of hiding. If this report didn't come to light how many people would of known about this guys bad luck.. No one. Why realease this report and then give everyone the suspicion that he may be CIA, if this happened his cover is already blown

He isn't a CIA operative end of


I do not think you have the actual authority or evidence to close this case.

I think you may be overestimating your status.




posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Misterlondon

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Well technically if his mother wasn't running in the marathon he wouldn't of been there how many other people would of gone to Boston they day to watch people run, them people too didn't really have a reason to be there apart from that they were watching the marathon any other day half of those people would of been there

if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news

I just think a case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time .. 3 times



You have to ask yourself.. Why is a missionary from utah running a marathon across the country in Boston?
Could be valid but then again might not be..

None of this adds up


Why would Eddie Izzard go to southe Africa to run 27 marathons in 27 days? Why would someone come from Scotland to run in the London marathon. Maybe they just like running and keeping fit and want to constantly challenge themselves. Unlike me I'm laying in bed right now .. It's my day off



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:01 AM
link   
a reply to: nonspecific
Ah damn sorry for using my brain

Ok so he is a CIA op and they put this report out so he can hide in plain site when it would of been a lot easier if they said nothing at all.

Sorry for commenting I'll take my two pence back

edit on 23-3-2016 by ThePeaceMaker because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Oh hiding in plain site is a great way to hide ... But not releasing or giving out any information is even better way of hiding. If this report didn't come to light how many people would of known about this guys bad luck.. No one. Why realease this report and then give everyone the suspicion that he may be CIA, if this happened his cover is already blown

He isn't a CIA operative end of


Look this site is all about thinking outside the box.. I'm not saying that is the case I'm just putting another theory forward..

Unless your sitting in an office in Langley how do you possibly know this isn't the case for sure..

Mmm... Unless maybe you are sitting in an office in Langley..



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Misterlondon no no I'm not in Langley I'm laying in bed in Essex
I agree thinking outside the box is great but when a more simple theory can be thought of I'd rather go with that. Each to their own though
i don't mean to cause offence it's just hiding in plain sight is great .. But not saying a single word in the first place is better



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker

originally posted by: Misterlondon

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Well technically if his mother wasn't running in the marathon he wouldn't of been there how many other people would of gone to Boston they day to watch people run, them people too didn't really have a reason to be there apart from that they were watching the marathon any other day half of those people would of been there

if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news

I just think a case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time .. 3 times



You have to ask yourself.. Why is a missionary from utah running a marathon across the country in Boston?
Could be valid but then again might not be..

None of this adds up


Why would Eddie Izzard go to southe Africa to run 27 marathons in 27 days? Why would someone come from Scotland to run in the London marathon. Maybe they just like running and keeping fit and want to constantly challenge themselves. Unlike me I'm laying in bed right now .. It's my day off


What does Eddie izzard running a marathon have to do with this..
Was he also caught up in 3 terrorist attacks?

Look at the facts here..



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: nonspecific
Ah damn sorry for using my brain

Ok so he is a CIA op and they put this report out so he can hide in plain site when it would of been a lot easier if they said nothing at all.

Sorry for commenting I'll take my two pence back


There is a difference between offering an opinion and making a definite determination without suitable evidence to back it up.

I said earlier that the likelihood he was an operative was slim but did not presume that I had the authority to end the debate based on my own personal belief.



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Misterlondon
You asked why someone from Utah would be in Boston running a marathon ... So why would Eddie Izard from the UK being running in South Africa ? My point is people travel everywhere to run marathons



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: Misterlondon no no I'm not in Langley I'm laying in bed in Essex
I agree thinking outside the box is great but when a more simple theory can be thought of I'd rather go with that. Each to their own though
i don't mean to cause offence it's just hiding in plain sight is great .. But not saying a single word in the first place is better



Unless of course you are aware that many conspiracy theorist are aware of what s going on, looking for crisis actors ect.

Someone could spot you in all 3 locations and blow your cover.

So maybe a Mormon missionary with extreme bad luck is a perfect way to explain your presence at multiple bomb sites...



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:09 AM
link   


He is just as likely to be a time traveller from the future observing key terrorist events and just stood a little too close this time.


I thought he could be back researching the events that led to whatever is the outcome of this "terror war". If it is true it could be a bad sign for the outcome unless scholastic research in the future uses time travel much like a library or the internet of today.

But I wonder about Boston, it seems to be a bit of an outlier. Maybe his presence there is why he became involved or volunteered.



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Misterlondon

Oh I'm sorry, I forget, you lot change things around to suit your beliefs.

Yes, the CIA planned to have their 19 year old agent/crisis actor found at these 3 events.

Because that's what TPTB do, isn't it? Hide in plain sight, that's the cliched go to here isn't it?

But when someone comes up with an idea that TPTB has a hidden agenda, that too is what they do.

Basically, it's win/win for the "outside of the box" thinker, isn't it?

What a way to think...smh



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: nonspecific

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: nonspecific
Ah damn sorry for using my brain

Ok so he is a CIA op and they put this report out so he can hide in plain site when it would of been a lot easier if they said nothing at all.

Sorry for commenting I'll take my two pence back


There is a difference between offering an opinion and making a definite determination without suitable evidence to back it up.

I said earlier that the likelihood he was an operative was slim but did not presume that I had the authority to end the debate based on my own personal belief.


And I too was offering my own opinion, my opinion was that at the slim chance of him being a CIA op is not correct. Surely if you were a CIA op involved in these attacks you would leave NO evidence you were there never mind having a news report about you being aired. People start connecting dots when you realease Information, just like here on ATS. All it took was that one report and already being suggest he may of been CIA .. Cover blown straight away. It's best to say nothing at all



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:15 AM
link   
And if he is 19 now ... How old would the son of been at the time of the Boston bombings ... A 16/17 year old CIA op ?

And reading the article it says the son was in Paris at the time but doesn't actually say he was where the attacks were, I had friend in London when the 7/7 bombing went off but they were no where near the bombing sites. Paris is a big city I just believe it's sheer coincidence and a lot of bad luck
edit on 23-3-2016 by ThePeaceMaker because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
And if he is 19 now ... How old would the son of been at the time of the Boston bombings ... A 16/17 year old CIA op ?


Again you are looking at perfect cover here.

Who would suspect someone so young as being an operative?

It is like MrLondon says, you have to think outside the box



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Misterlondon

Oh I'm sorry, I forget, you lot change things around to suit your beliefs.

Yes, the CIA planned to have their 19 year old agent/crisis actor found at these 3 events.

Because that's what TPTB do, isn't it? Hide in plain sight, that's the cliched go to here isn't it?

But when someone comes up with an idea that TPTB has a hidden agenda, that too is what they do.

Basically, it's win/win for the "outside of the box" thinker, isn't it?

What a way to think...smh



You lot? What's that supposed to mean? Are you not a long standing member of this site as well?

Whilst your on your soap box why not tell us your theory on how exactly someone gets caught up in 3 of the major terrorist atrocities in recent years? Instead of just putting people down because they don't fit with your idealistic world.



posted on Mar, 23 2016 @ 06:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: roadgravel


He is just as likely to be a time traveller from the future observing key terrorist events and just stood a little too close this time.


I thought he could be back researching the events that led to whatever is the outcome of this "terror war". If it is true it could be a bad sign for the outcome unless scholastic research in the future uses time travel much like a library or the internet of today.

But I wonder about Boston, it seems to be a bit of an outlier. Maybe his presence there is why he became involved or volunteered.






top topics



 
24
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join