It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: queenofswords
You mean he's not a member of the Church of Climatology!
All the Big Globalist Government Priests won't be getting his support, I guess.
How are the "studies" supposed to continue? Who is going to fund the "scientists"? Who is going to pay to color the stats? This stuff takes money. Jobs will be lost! This is the fundamental doctrine of the Church of Climatology! How are Big Family Foundations going to survive?!
If we can't prove man, and man alone, is responsible for heating/cooling/heating again/cooling again/big storms/little storms/warm winters/cold winters/hottest days since 1920's/etc., how can we ask our "flock of sheep" for their contributions? How can we maintain our Big Slush Funds?
Somebody convert that man NOW!
originally posted by: pirhanna
The first problem here is that climate change is a "belief" which means it is more akin to religion than science. And second is that it had to be changed from global warming to climate change because tenperature data recently didnt support global warming. Third issue is that carbon dioxide is not poisonous. It is what plants breathe, and increased co2 levels should theoretically be conducive to increased plant growth, meaning increased oxygen production.
There is a lot of evidence on both sides of the issue of how much co2 emmissions affect the climate. If one really bothers to study all,of it thoroughly, one will see that this is not a cut and dry issue either way.
And my last point, no matter what the conclusion is, the only reason climate change is being pushed is so there can be carbon taxes. Carbon taxes are the basis of,the new worpd government globalists are trying to construct.
Third issue is that carbon dioxide is not poisonous. It is what plants breathe, and increased co2 levels should theoretically be conducive to increased plant growth, meaning increased oxygen production.
The first problem here is that climate change is a "belief" which means it is more akin to religion than science.
originally posted by: tadaman
Read that if you still think MOST scientists are on board with this mass hysteria.
Also this is not a claim like evolution or such since they have good data to go on for those.
This is not even a good theory.
The whole 97% concensus is BS. It was made by a global warming ACTIVIST with questionable ties who looked over published papers on the subject. He applied his spin on what they say.
Allot of the scientist came forward to say their work did not say what he said it did.