It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Physics of Ionising Radiation.

page: 4
19
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 01:37 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

so you know more about the device and its effects, eh. Yeah right




posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 01:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: TerryDon79

so you know more about the device and its effects, eh. Yeah right


So far the machine has not been tested in a controlled environment. There is no reading of any ionised radiation. The way the weight changes has been easily explained by others. The flickering candle is easily explained by a draft (as its outside).

This isn't science. This is f'd up-beyond laughable-stretch of the imagination-pseudoscience at its finest.

ETA: Besides that video (which has been debunked) is there, or has there been, any other videos with actual science to prove it works?
edit on 2432016 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 01:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Nochzwei

Don't know about the research you mean, but when you mention time dilation effects...how do you know the animal life exposed to the ionising radiation dies within hours?

For all we know, the temporal effects you spoke of, could be affecting time to such a degree that the animal lives a full and rich life and dies of old age.

It might just seem like a few hours to us, but to the animal exposed to the time dilation effects it could be years.

Frivilous...but thought provoking.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 03:44 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

dude read the op and post if you can come up with the physics as asked



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 03:47 PM
link   
a reply to: MysterX

gosh good point, never thought of it like that. certainly thought provoking.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: TerryDon79

dude read the op and post if you can come up with the physics as asked


Dude! The physics don't exist. Your machine is a fake.

If you want the physics search out a theoretical physicist or a pseudoscientist.

Your ideas are wrong. If your ideas were correct then X-ray machines would levitate and stop time.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 09:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: [post=20525722]TerryDon79 .

Your ideas are wrong. If your ideas were correct then X-ray machines would levitate and stop time.
why would they?



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 09:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Nochzwei

Because X-rays are a form of ionising radiation. By your reasoning it is proof of anti gravity. Therefore X-ray machines should be anti gravity machines.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 09:38 PM
link   
Lol. How did you make that out. Have you problems with the English language?

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Nochzwei

Because X-rays are a form of ionising radiation. By your reasoning it is proof of anti gravity. Therefore X-ray machines should be anti gravity machines.



posted on Mar, 24 2016 @ 09:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nochzwei
Lol. How did you make that out. Have you problems with the English language?

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Nochzwei

Because X-rays are a form of ionising radiation. By your reasoning it is proof of anti gravity. Therefore X-ray machines should be anti gravity machines.


Makes as much sense as what you're asking in this thread.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 09:28 AM
link   
Am beginning to lean towards implosion of high energy dark matter /dark energy particles from the time domain into our domain to be the cause of the radiation affects from the machine



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 09:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Nochzwei

Time is a measurement. it has no domain.
unless you mean time.com
because that is technically a domain.
There have never been Dark Energy particles observed.
Can you please explain in some sort of known scientific terminology why were leaning one way or another without understanding how any of this works in the most simplest sense?
I'm not attacking you.
I just really don't understand what you were asking or saying



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 11:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Nochzwei

Time is a measurement. it has no domain.
unless you mean time.com
because that is technically a domain.
There have never been Dark Energy particles observed.
Can you please explain in some sort of known scientific terminology why were leaning one way or another without understanding how any of this works in the most simplest sense?
I'm not attacking you.
I just really don't understand what you were asking or saying
begining to lean means im formulating a new cutting edge theory.
wt do you mean by saying not understanding in the simplest sense?
its time to observe dark matter and dark energy particles. there is always a beginning for everything, and i am making the beginning.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Nochzwei

But using Buzz words like Cutting Edge and dark energy particles doesn't mean you understand what is actually going on.
for instance where did you learn the term dark energy and dark matter.
Do you know that it is never actually been observed.
It is a term used as a place holder to explain why there is a bunch of unaccounted-for mass in the universe
Saying random scientific-sounding words does not make it
a theory.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 11:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Nochzwei

Time is a measurement. it has no domain.
unless you mean time.com
because that is technically a domain.
There have never been Dark Energy particles observed.
Can you please explain in some sort of known scientific terminology why were leaning one way or another without understanding how any of this works in the most simplest sense?
I'm not attacking you.
I just really don't understand what you were asking or saying
begining to lean means im formulating a new cutting edge theory.
wt do you mean by saying not understanding in the simplest sense?
its time to observe dark matter and dark energy particles. there is always a beginning for everything, and i am making the beginning.


No it does not mean you're coming up with a cutting edge theory.

It actually means you're coming up with a hypothesis. A theory would have to pass peer review and be tested and proven by others.

Now you run into a rather large problem. You're trying to formulate a hypothesis on something that is a hoax.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:26 PM
link   
a reply to: dashen

my theory/ hypothesis is that dark matter/energy reside in the time domain



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

the hoax you mention is purely your erroneous assumption



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: TerryDon79

the hoax you mention is purely your erroneous assumption


You have yet to show any tests done in a controlled environment. Why is that? Could it be that under strict control the whole thing doesn't do what it's meant to do?

First you need to prove something works before you can ask anyone of the physics behind it.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: dashen

my theory/ hypothesis is that dark matter/energy reside in the time domain

Time is not a "domain", and dark matter/dark energy don't exist. They're just placeholder terms.



posted on Mar, 25 2016 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: TerryDon79

the hoax you mention is purely your erroneous assumption


You have yet to show any tests done in a controlled environment. Why is that? Could it be that under strict control the whole thing doesn't do what it's meant to do?

First you need to prove something works before you can ask anyone of the physics behind it.
Lol do you want to do this controlled test?



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join