It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Muslims Rioting in Belgium Over Arrest of Paris Terrorist [POSSIBLE PROPAGANDA]

page: 4
38
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:18 AM
link   
Lets all calm down and wait an see what te truth is then go from there




posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:19 AM
link   
a reply to: SkepticOverlord

The translation I got:

The security forces also had to manage the ambient nervousness of people massed around the security perimeter.

edit on 3/22/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

This bit from the opening post is plain wrong.


Basically, Muslims in Belgium are protesting in the streets, and attacking police officers, because they are angry that the man behind the Paris terror attacks in 2015 has been caught. His neighbours knew where he was for all this time.

These people are defending a man who helped to kill 130 innocent French civilians.

I see not a single Muslim parade supporting the capture of this terrorist. Yet there is Muslims protesting against the capture of this terrorist. These people sheltered him and supported his actions. This makes me so furious.

There is nothing to support it, or the headline. It's fabricated. It's a hoax based on a highly-sensationalized story from a newspaper known for highly sensationalized stories.



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:22 AM
link   
So wonder how many people on the first page are gonna come in and admit they were wrong about this...



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:23 AM
link   
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
Yes. I know the OP is wrong.

It's not the first time an OP has completely distorted the facts as presented.

Right? So we're clear? That constitutes a hoax?

Isn't a hoax perpetrated by a member a banning offense?

edit on 3/22/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:24 AM
link   
Yes, the article and the OP are misleading. You can see how well it worked, with the responses earlier in the thread.

All to generate more hate against Muslims, and people are only too happy to let themselves be fooled.



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Do you know your article is from the day he was capture and don't mention people calling him hero?



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigent
Do you know the article in the OP is the next day?



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:28 AM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

I was wrong.

But the part of it being believable in this day and age is a sign of the times.



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:28 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I don't even know what day is today, stop praying on the weak


I'm my defense:



Basically, Muslims in Belgium are protesting in the streets, and attacking police officers, because they are angry that the man behind the Paris terror attacks in 2015 has been caught. His neighbours knew where he was for all this time.


Op made it sound like it was happening now and not 3-4 days ago
edit on 22-3-2016 by Indigent because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:33 AM
link   
This is not done... it's going to evolve into something...
another shootout and arrests or another attack...
But what would be a much bigger story and even more scary is that I feel it is being perpetrated by a much more powerful organization than isis...
Not saying isis is not involved only that the coordination is too slick...



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigent
A good lesson.

Don't believe what the OP tells you about something without checking it out first.

The importance of doing so is directly proportional to the sensationalist level of the claim.



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:38 AM
link   
a reply to: TechniXcality




But the part of it being believable in this day and age is a sign of the times.

You mean of a mindset?



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:41 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

No I mean sign of the times.

But speaking of mindset, what would that be?



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Which mindset are you referring to?
People who are offended and afraid of the evil committed by members of Islam?
Or members of Islam who deny that members of thier faith committed them because of thier faith?



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:43 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle

People with a confirmation bias so strong that they immediately accept anything (anything), at face value, which supports their bias.

edit on 3/22/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You danced around that rather eloquently...
I was hoping to draw some bias from you...
I see you will be having none of that....

edit on 22-3-2016 by 5StarOracle because: word



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:47 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle

Dance? I don't dance.
That was a straight ahead stroll.



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Phage, do you really think I fall in that category, after having admitted I was wrong?



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 12:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You didn't comment on either of the options I provided you which you seemed to be eluding to...




top topics



 
38
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join