It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump at AIPAC: Iran is The Destabilizer in Syria and Middle East.

page: 1
16
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 08:37 PM
link   
Do watch the speech carefully.



He basically says that its Iran that is The Destabilizer in Syria and middle east no mention of Turkey nor Sunnis the Saudis.


To those who say Trump is anti war clearer dont know anything. He says was anti war only agaisnt the war agaisnt the war in Iraq but when it comes to Syria trump is a full neocon.
edit on 21-3-2016 by TaleDawn because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 08:44 PM
link   
I think he is only saying that because he knows it is what the Republicans want to hear and he is getting worried about all the heat on him.


+7 more 
posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 08:51 PM
link   
I did not hear him say anything about attacking anyone.
He talked about negotiating.
- But not the whimpy kind of deals done by our current POTUS.
- He talked about making the tough kind of deals where everyone understands the stakes and understands who is holding the cards and is running the program.

I think Trump nailed that speech.

Oh and regarding the comment in the OP about not talking about the other terrorist states - Trump certainly did mention the others.
However, he was highlighting the ones of most concert to the Israeli state right now - as that was the point of the discussion at this venue.
It was not supposed to be a full on discussion of all terrorism.
edit on 3/21/16 by BlueAjah because: added

edit on 3/21/16 by BlueAjah because: one word



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 08:51 PM
link   
a reply to: charolais

Dont count on that. At least Rand Paul didn't show up for AIPAC. If you want to be natural on the issue the best thing is to not show up. And those Israelis there at that event made my blood boil.

They have state now why dont they just go back to their empire?
edit on 21-3-2016 by TaleDawn because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 08:53 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah



I did not hear him say anything about attacking anyone.

I sure did, Trump and Cruz are no different from each other.



- But not the whimpy kind of deals done by our current POTUS.

Whimmpy deal? seriously NeoCons you are comical bush failed to prove that Saddam had WMDs and now Its going to be Iraq 2.0 all over again.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 08:54 PM
link   
Well that is disappointing. Same view as Hillary. I had heard him say other things on it before.

Is it just me or is he just saying whatever is expedient as he goes?



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: pirhanna




Is it just me or is he just saying whatever is expedient as he goes?

Trump knows the stupid people so he knows whatever he says people will dig into it.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:00 PM
link   


He talked about negotiating.
- But not the whimpy kind of deals done by our current POTUS.
- He talked about making the tough kind of deals where everyone understands the stakes and understands who is holding the cards and is running the program.


Hard line negotiations, like Reagan.

The crew who gave us the Iran-Contra Affair.
edit on 3/21/2016 by roadgravel because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:03 PM
link   
a reply to: pirhanna

How did he change his view? He never said he would not support Israel.
Tonight he said the same thing that he has always said - that Israel and Palestine should do their own negotiation between themselves.
He said tonight the US would help with the deal, but it was between them and up to them.

He also said the US would not pressure Israel into a deal. Which is a big difference from the Obama/Hillary approach.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: TaleDawn
a reply to: pirhanna




Is it just me or is he just saying whatever is expedient as he goes?

Trump knows the stupid people so he knows whatever he says people will dig into it.


Ya. That has been apparent for sure, though he has slipped a few things along the way i think he really means. Hes definitely a nationalist. He definitely wants to scrap the nwo trade deals. He slipped the 911 thing quietly. He really doesnt like illegal Immigration. Hes been fairly vocal about non intervention in the middle east. But i guess he probably wants aipac off his back a bit to wrap up the nomination?



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:09 PM
link   
Donald Trump had a high-level meeting with the Republican Party leaders this afternoon before his speech. I bet the content of the speech was part of their meeting agenda. After all, Donald Trump signed off on an agreement to work with the Republican party, several months ago.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah

I did not hear him say anything about attacking anyone.
He talked about negotiating.
- But not the whimpy kind of deals done by our current POTUS.
- He talked about making the tough kind of deals where everyone understands the stakes and understands who is holding the cards and is running the program.

I think Trump nailed that speech.


Nationalism at its finest.

Who exactly is holding the cards? Who elected the US to lead the world into the "New American Century"?

We are a sovereign nation that makes up less then 5% of the world population.

The arrogance of Trump's brand of American Nationalism is out of hand. We are not the world police. We have no right to dictate world policy. If might makes right why don't we applaud the bully?



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:20 PM
link   
So much for not pandering to lobbyists.

I wish Presidential candidates were as loyal to US citizens as they are to Israel.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:27 PM
link   
Israelite's have the largest lobby in America and only make up 2% of the population. The Jewish ass kissing by American politicians is sickening.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:37 PM
link   
From my understanding of at least the last one hundred years or so of history in the Middle East the US has been the number one factor in destabilising it. He blames Iran but we destabilised Iran.

The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup, was the ...... 1950s and a successful C.I.A.-sponsored coup in Guyana which led to the 1979 Islamist revolution in the country.

Check out some of the photos pre-1970s revolution Iran. link


edit on 21-3-2016 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:38 PM
link   
a reply to: pirhanna



Hes been fairly vocal about non intervention in the middle east.


When someone talks about bombing and taking their oil that is surely not non intervention in the middle east.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

Radical Islam is the destabilizer....we had it stabilized...Iran was a beautiful country as well as Palestine.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: TaleDawn

If Iran is the destabiliser in the Middle East and Syria what does that have to do with Trump and America? You're thousands of miles away and there are other 'likeminded' regimes much closer to centre stage OR does the establishment have some fiscally # up notion that the US must somehow, at the expense of your failing economy and infrastructure, support a country adequately equiped to support itself?

Trump is a goose, the US government, the CIA, is the destabiliser, bloody hell - talk about pandering.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   
Yes,Iran is but he left out the head of the snake, Obama.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 10:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: pirhanna

How did he change his view? He never said he would not support Israel.
Tonight he said the same thing that he has always said - that Israel and Palestine should do their own negotiation between themselves.
He said tonight the US would help with the deal, but it was between them and up to them.

He also said the US would not pressure Israel into a deal. Which is a big difference from the Obama/Hillary approach.


Yes or go into it totally on the Israeli side of the table against the palestinians. Which will what would be perceived by the
Palestinians.



new topics

top topics



 
16
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join