It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

My observations on Trump hate from traveling for the last month.

page: 5
66
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

Uh yeah, I am a Globalist and see the world as a whole.

You "lose" the planet, you lose everything - - - so to speak.

IMO the health of the planet needs to come before anything else.


Without opening the whole can of worms about just how much of the planet's warming is man-made versus part of a natural cycle...I will put some words in Trumps mouth on this issue, that I assume he would agree with, given his remarks about Free Trade versus Fair Trade.

If we can all agree that a cleaner, less polluted, environment is good for all of mankind (and life on the planet overall) - then we should insist that the burden for cleaning up our act, as a species, should be borne by all.

There should be no "freebees" for developing nations, and other major polluters like China and India...while the West (the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, etc.) are held to strict standards, that make our products more expensive and our economies less competitive.

How about Fair and Equal Emissions Standards for all Nations?

edit on 20-3-2016 by mobiusmale because: typo




posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 03:05 PM
link   
a reply to: AbbaCabba

Denying ignorance is not belittling someone.

It's pointing out hypocrisy. That's all I have done.

Secondly if anyone is belittling anyone it's the ones labelling non-Trump supporters as brats and babies...
Just because their idol is being questioned.


Finally the COTUS' Amendments protect me from precisely nothing because I'm British.



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: mobiusmale

Without opening the whole can of worms about just how much of the planet's warming is man-made versus part of a natural cycle...I will put some words in Trumps mouth on this issue, that I assume he would agree with, given his remarks about Free Trade versus Fair Trade.

If we can all agree that a cleaner, less polluted, environment is good for all of mankind (and life on the planet overall) - then we should insist that the burden for cleaning up our act, as a species, should be borne by all.



Absolutely! Every individual, every city, every state, every country, every world leader.

What the hell difference does it make if human's contribute a minuscule or 80%? If you can't see the whole of the picture, you're making excuses.

People make excuses because they don't want to give up anything.



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 03:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: whyamIhere

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask




Jim jones would be envious of trump and his following


Because he is popular, therefor Jim Jones would be envious? Perhaps Justin Bieber is envious as well. Good one.


Waiting for someone to make the first "Trump is the Anti-Christ" thread.

It's coming...when the "Trump is Hitler" accusations fell flat.

Its really the next logical yet completely hysterical proclamation.



Ya think there's any possibility we could actually discuss his qualifications?

Or how he would actually handle certain situations the job requires?

Sure, go right ahead. I'd love to see the left and the progressives actually discuss the above.

What I mainly see, and this thread is yet another example of it, is constant taking Trump's words out of context and incorrectly labeling them as racist or hate speech.

Protecting against illegal immigration is not racist, it's an economic and safety issue.

Putting a temporary hold on Muslims entering is not racist, it's a safety issue based on a global threat.

Yet that's pretty much the incorrect spin most in the anti-Trump brigade base their arguments off. They don't even have a basic or elementary understanding of the issues at hand or what Trump even said.

The sad part, the unfortunate part isn't what Trump's doing, it's that an enormous segment of our population is so naive to current events, so insulated from the world at large, so ignorant to the global landscape that they can't even form a coherent argument and instead, almost their entire defense is revolving around not even knowing the basic definition of racism.

It's completely and utterly embarrassing to this once great nation. Instead of having an intelligent debate on the issues, what we see is an entire anti-Trump movement essentially based off the template of a child's temper tantrum. The discussion is well above their heads, so they instead kick and scream, shut down free speech, chain themselves to cars and block roadways, threaten violence while yelling "he's so mean, he's so racist". Then they turn around and cry victim while acting bewildered as to why they get no respect.
edit on 20-3-2016 by MysticPearl because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 04:16 PM
link   
Well on a road trip... musing on current events, generally... I had what seemed to me, a FLASH OF INSIGHT. One of those moments of clarity and gut knowing kinda deals...

This is all about Hillary, distracting folks from Sanders.

Soros, is funding the protests and ramping up the vitriol and conflict, so he can draw attention AWAY from Bernie Sanders.

Soros wants to suck the atmosphere out of the Sanders campaign by creating one "Mother of All Distractions" which will draw folks who might be sympathetic to Sanders.

THAT'S why Soros is dumping money into this.



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 04:22 PM
link   
If Trump can cause this much hate and strife simply by running for office.. and has groups condemning and banning him even pre-election, what do you think it will be like if he is elected the POTAS? Cause and effect. His attitude is brash and unforgiving. He is basically a bully. And so in kind, he reaps what he sows.

When someone is in your face and tries to calmly talk things out, what is the result? And if they are screaming in your face instead?

He may have a vision about making America great again, but having a bully running the show isn't the catalyst that will make it happen.



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: whyamIhere

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask




Jim jones would be envious of trump and his following


Because he is popular, therefor Jim Jones would be envious? Perhaps Justin Bieber is envious as well. Good one.


Waiting for someone to make the first "Trump is the Anti-Christ" thread.

It's coming...when the "Trump is Hitler" accusations fell flat.

Its really the next logical yet completely hysterical proclamation.



Ya think there's any possibility we could actually discuss his qualifications?

Or how he would actually handle certain situations the job requires?

Sure, go right ahead. I'd love to see the left and the progressives actually discuss the above.



Feel free, start a thread.

I'd love to see the right and Trump supporters discussing his actual real qualifications.

His platforms, details on how he wants to accomplish his positions.

This has nothing to do with the Left or Progressives. I ask for Trumps qualifications, and you respond with Lefts and Progressives?



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 05:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: fleabit
If Trump can cause this much hate and strife simply by running for office.. and has groups condemning and banning him even pre-election, what do you think it will be like if he is elected the POTAS?


Exactly! Can you see him dealing with foreign dignitaries or even head's of state?

I would like to see him get hired for a political position (not POTAS) - - to see how he would handle it.

Personally, I don't think he could handle it. He only knows how to be the Big Shot guy in charge.



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 05:59 PM
link   
Not the biggest fan of Trump but even less a fan of this far left wing liberal movement making fools of themselves and our political process, taking laws into their own hands, redifining morality and policy to their own liking, all while living in self entitled shoe rotting away on the inside.

I don't get how the most educated group of our population can be so darn ignorant and foolish. Brainwash at universities much? Its like they're churning out radicalized hillary clintons mixed with a little malcolm x at every turn.

Liberal Example - A

Hi Jane Im pregnant Im going for my prenatal exam next week where I can see if its a boy or a girl. Im so excited I cant wait to find out sex. Its truly amazing they can see already.

Liberal Example - B

Hi Jane you're not gonna believe this but Im pregnant. Ive been hiding it for six months but Ive decided its just too much for me right now to not have a social life or have to get two jobs that im just going to get an abortion. (Well you know Tina it's a womans right to choose so that thing is just a blob of useless cells anyway. Its not even a human.) Gee thanks Jane you're so right this is just a worthless clump of cells. Im going to get an abortion.

Later that week...

(thththtrrrrrththrthrhtrhtrtptptptpppp)

Alright doc we've got the fetus sucked out what should we do now.
(Harvest as many body parts as you can from this worthless pile of useless cells so we can sell them)

(FACEPALM.....)

However a liberal forms their logic it must include a huge dose of either ignorance, stupidity, or cold hearted selfishness. Maybe all three.
edit on 20-3-2016 by libertytoall because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 06:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: whyamIhere

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask




Jim jones would be envious of trump and his following


Because he is popular, therefor Jim Jones would be envious? Perhaps Justin Bieber is envious as well. Good one.


Waiting for someone to make the first "Trump is the Anti-Christ" thread.

It's coming...when the "Trump is Hitler" accusations fell flat.

Its really the next logical yet completely hysterical proclamation.



Someone already made the anti-Christ reference on here. I'm looking for it. Every president or nominee from Reagan on down has been the anti-Christ, don't you know.

It was in this thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...
"This the intelligent strategy to defeat this terribly corrupt billionaire that has been unmasked by H.H. Pope Francis I, as an Antichristcomming to America, this is the way to stop him in each state":
edit on 3jY by UnBreakable because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 07:46 PM
link   
No evidence that the Great Soul ever said that but it does a nice job of summarizing his nonviolence approach to achieveing change. a reply to: UnBreakable



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 08:07 PM
link   
I think its sad that people get so manipulated by the corporate media and creates hate etc. Trump, while I prefer Sanders but he's not gonna be nominated, is not so bad. While listening to his debates I thought the guy was really good at defending himself and he got some pretty solid ideas. The media is probably scared of a guy they can't control and they might loose some of that control is he's elected. I think Hillary is worst than Trump but who cares about the investigation and shaddy business she does as long as she get paid for by the rich and support the corporations its all good.

Trump pretty much defends himself against the whole system and I greatly respect that.
edit on 20-3-2016 by NavyNut because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 08:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: woogleuk
Because the world has already learnt a harsh lesson with Mr Hitler, they don't want a repeat with Mr Trump.


So the lesson is to become that which you seek to prevent? Really?

Let me lay this out ...

There is no way that Trump will EVER become Hitler. He can't. He is too hated by the established politicians in both parties and not popular enough in the general population. The last person in this country who had a shot at it was honestly Obama who had extremely high approval just post election and both houses of Congress firmly in the grasp of his own party. For that small window of time, it was his to grab hold of, but he didn't take advantage.

That being said, because Trump is so controversial, even within his own party, all he has to do if he does get elected is step slightly out of line, and the Democrats will begin impeachment proceedings and there will be enough Republicans to go along with it. And Trump won't have enough populist support to survive, especially since we all know the media is against him.

Anyone with half a brain ought to be able to figure this out if they just spend some time thinking about it.



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 09:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Thank you for your assessment. Just as I expected.

The obfuscation around this matter and the blatant propaganda attempting to reinterpret actual states of affairs has reached dangerous proportions. It's not only that people are dead wrong about Trump and his supporters, it's that they also believe they are right, and that is a recipe for disaster.



LesMis,

I always enjoy your replies because you get right to the point without using excess verbiage.
You are a sniper in the war of words.



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 09:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

His qualifications to be POTUS are and only need to be:
1. He is a natural born citizen.
2. He is at least 35 years of age.
3. He has been a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.

What else is there? Does he need to have been a career politician like everyone else in the running? Should he have been a former 1st Spouse like Hillary? How about a former Secretary of State that allowed one of her ambassadors and 3 other Americans to be killed when one of her embassies was left unprotected on purpose, like Hillary? Should he have been in such power so as to order the assault on a peaceful compound of law-abiding citizens and kill every last man, woman, and child (like Hillary did with the Branch Davidians at Mt Carmel in Waco, TX)? Should he have a wake of dozens of past close associates that have committed suicide (some by multiple gunshots to the back of their head or multiple directly in the chest) like Hillary?
OR
Should he have been unemployed until he was 40 and belong to the Communist Party USA like Bernie?
OR
Should he be bowing down to China, Japan, Mexico, illegal immigrants, the European Union, Saudi Arabia, Google, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, Wall Street, like everyone else in the running?
OR
Should he be sugar coating his words so as to not possibly offend anyone, especially Muslim immigrants because we all know they are of peace and are 100% for the American Way?

Are those the kind of qualifications he is lacking?



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 01:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: primus2012
a reply to: Annee

His qualifications to be POTUS are and only need to be:
1. He is a natural born citizen.
2. He is at least 35 years of age.
3. He has been a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.

What else is there?


Experience.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 03:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

What was George Washington's experience before he became president? How about Lincoln? Clinton, Reagan?



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 03:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Do you think the breakdown of major city's is on the horizon, via mass rioting? Honestly, I think we are seeing the infancy of something like that occurring. Also, I generally do not engage in hyperbole, I'm just taken aback by this whole situation.


Yes I do. Im glad to be moving outside the city soon. This is the decline of America. Some folks including Soros are trying to do what they did to Ukraine, Syria, Egypt and Libya in America.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 06:12 AM
link   
a reply to: watchitburn

Yep those loving, tolerant, helpful liberials. Unless of course you disagree with any of their ideas. Then they attack with everything they can get their hands on.

OK to be FAIR maybe we should start calling them the "RADICAL" Liberals. But that might be seen as raciest or bigot. But, of course liberialism isn't a race or culture so how could I be called that? But wait, if I start to be hateful an intolerant of all those bad conservative, I'll be alright?

This is just getting to confusing.







posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 06:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Konduit

I Love it.







top topics



 
66
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join