It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Guardian recently released an animated short set in a time when machines dominate the workforce. The story follows the last human worker going on with their average day. Most other humans seen are lining the streets in poverty, as empty high-rise apartment buildings line the skies. The short is beautifully depicted, but has frightening implications.
According to Moshe Vardi, professor of computer science at Rice University: “Machines could take 50% of jobs in the next 30 years.” And Andy Haldane, Bank of England chief economist, notes, “Machines are already undertaking tasks which were unthinkable—if not unimaginable—a decade ago.”
Even as automation takes over many of today’s jobs—new opportunities may also appear as a result. And these jobs of the future may be much more meaningful for everybody.
“The light at the end of this tunnel,” writes Vivek Wadhwa, “may be a world in which the pursuit of enlightenment is more cherished than the pursuit of money.”
While extreme utopian and dystopian views ordinarily dominate the conversation, the possibility of a middle scenario appearing may be just as likely. And maybe the next generation of “jobs” will empower humans instead of devaluing them.
S. Vollie Osborn offers another fresh perspective: “The developments and innovations produced by passion, and aided by technology, have stretched the imagination. From the realization of many concepts formerly considered science fiction, to the creation of new forms of art, we already stand in awe of what passion and innovation can achieve.”
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Ghost147
I think worrying about things that might happen is a waste of time. Unless you plan on going all Ted Kaczynski on technology I would recommend you sit back and enjoy the ride.
originally posted by: Ghost147
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Ghost147
I think worrying about things that might happen is a waste of time. Unless you plan on going all Ted Kaczynski on technology I would recommend you sit back and enjoy the ride.
I don't find a lack of discussion and to simply 'let things go out untouched and unplanned' to be a very valuable form of dealing with issues
originally posted by: schuyler
One of the issues here is how much this is hyperbole and how much is fact. The claim is that ALL jobs will be eliminated and EVERYONE will be unemployed.
Really?
originally posted by: Ghost147
originally posted by: schuyler
One of the issues here is how much this is hyperbole and how much is fact. The claim is that ALL jobs will be eliminated and EVERYONE will be unemployed.
Really?
That's just the title of the film. I stated in the OP the following:
Although I do not believe we will totally rid ourselves of every single job, I do believe that we will rid ourselves of so many jobs that it could easily cause societal collapses unless we build a new system where jobs aren't an absolute requirement for life.
“The light at the end of this tunnel,” writes Vivek Wadhwa, “may be a world in which the pursuit of enlightenment is more cherished than the pursuit of money.”
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: corvuscorrax
Congratulations, I too have a couple of jobs that I love, but I'm acutely aware that there are people outside of me who aren't so lucky. I can think of few things worse than not having a job, and the income and satisfaction it brings.
I wish everyone could find the job they want and deserve.
This is a good list of jobs that robot's couldn't easily take over. I would ad, tree workers, chefs, healthcare workers and care providers, veterinarians.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
The artist. The craftsman. The inventor. The repairman. Plus other functions that we can't even think of.
originally posted by: Ghost147
One huge problem that's about to hit us is a fully automated world. It is no longer a question that we are going to lose our jobs to the machines we build, it will happen and it is happening. The question now is "how do we live in a society with no jobs?".
The Guardian recently released an animated short set in a time when machines dominate the workforce. The story follows the last human worker going on with their average day. Most other humans seen are lining the streets in poverty, as empty high-rise apartment buildings line the skies. The short is beautifully depicted, but has frightening implications.
According to Moshe Vardi, professor of computer science at Rice University: “Machines could take 50% of jobs in the next 30 years.” And Andy Haldane, Bank of England chief economist, notes, “Machines are already undertaking tasks which were unthinkable—if not unimaginable—a decade ago.”
However, there is another point of view that many of you may hold:
While extreme utopian and dystopian views ordinarily dominate the conversation, the possibility of a middle scenario appearing may be just as likely. And maybe the next generation of “jobs” will empower humans instead of devaluing them.
I do believe that we will rid ourselves of so many jobs that it could easily cause societal collapses unless we build a new system where jobs aren't an absolute requirement for life.
So I'm wondering; What do you think of all this? What do you think needs to be done about it? And do you think it's Achievable?