It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From: Hillary Clinton To: Jake Sullivan Date: 2012-07-23 06:53 Subject: H: NEW INTEL SYRIA, TURYKEY, ISRAEL, IRAN. SID
One particular source states that the British and French Intelligence services believe that their Israeli counterparts are convinced that there is a positive side to the civil war in Syria;
...if the Assad regime topples, Iran would lose its only ally in the Middle East and would be isolated. At the same time, the fall of the House of Assad could well ignite a sectarian war between the Shiites and the majority Sunnis of the region drawing in Iran, which, in the view of Israeli commanders would not be a bad thing for Israel and its Western allies.
In the opinion of this individual, such a scenario would distract and might obstruct Iran from its nuclear activities for a good deal of time. In addition, certain senior Israeli intelligence analysts believe that this turn of events may even prove to be a factor in the eventual fall of the current government of Iran.
Unlike in Libya, a successful intervention in Syria would require substantial diplomatic and military leadership from the United States. Washington should start by expressing its willingness to work with regional allies like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar to organize, train and arm Syrian rebel forces. The announcement of such a decision would, by itself, likely cause substantial defections from the Syrian military. Then, using territory in Turkey and possibly Jordan, U.S. diplomats and Pentagon officials can start strengthening the opposition. It will take time. But the rebellion is going to go on for a long time, with or without U.S. involvement. The second step is to develop international support for a coalition air operation. Russia will never support such a mission, so there is no point operating through the UN Security Council. Some argue that U.S. involvement risks a wider war with Russia. But the Kosovo example shows otherwise. In that case, Russia had genuine ethnic and political ties to the Serbs, which don't exist between Russia and Syria, and even then Russia did little more than complain. Russian officials have already acknowledged they won't stand in the way if intervention comes.
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
I'll bear that in mind.
originally posted by: damwel
Oh I get it. Since her emails turned to not be top secret now this is what is wrong with them. They are racist. The right is pathetic.
originally posted by: ketsuko
people are calling this advocating for genocide?
It's all part of the Globalist bloodlines agenda... Shove all the "useless eaters" into the West with their brethren and let them slaughter each other via Divide & Conquer. They're destabilising entire continents for their own gain... Complete rulership under totalitarian authority. And Hillary and her CFR buddies wish to make sure of it.
Of course they are. Its been proven time and again they will lie and distort information to paint a false narrative of the US.
the fall of the House of Assad could well ignite a sectarian war between the Shiites and the majority Sunnis of the region drawing in Iran, which, in the view of Israeli commanders would not be a bad thing for Israel and its Western allies.
Evolution of USA propaganda ... 1. Dismiss 2. Distort 3. Distract 4. Dismay