It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: rkingpin
why does a large section of ATS have this obsession with shifting the burden of evidence ?
originally posted by: DupontDeux
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: MALBOSIA
How is it a joke? Because of the ice created by methane gas?
Methane's melting point (albeit a sea level) is -182°C.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: rkingpin
But how true are the conspiracy theories?
Have scientists actually debunked the Bermuda Triangle?
A better question would be "Has anyone proven the "Bermuda Triangle" exists?
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
People have gone and mapped the area even.
You can even find it by looking on any map since many decades gone by.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: rkingpin
But how true are the conspiracy theories?
Have scientists actually debunked the Bermuda Triangle?
A better question would be "Has anyone proven the "Bermuda Triangle" exists?
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: DupontDeux
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: MALBOSIA
How is it a joke? Because of the ice created by methane gas?
Methane's melting point (albeit a sea level) is -182°C.
I believe you have forgotten a variable ... pressure.
A discovery of giant underwater craters at the bottom of Barents Sea could offer a viable explanation to the disappearance of ships in the Bermuda Triangle.
Scientists have found craters up to half a mile wide and 150ft deep, believed to have been caused by build-ups of methane off the coast of natural gas-rich Norway.
The methane would have leaked from deposits of natural gas further below the surface and created cavities which finally bursts, scientists say.