It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: gladtobehere
And no mention of him deciding to "pull the building", how strange.
Not strange at all, as he never said to "pull the building"!
So you think "pull it" means to tell firefighters to leave the building ?
That is not what he said, but nice that you think it was!!!
Why would a building contractor use that term , which is used to describe completing destruction of a building, not to mention something that would not have been his call ANYWAYS, IF it was about the firefighters.....
It is most entertaining to see the ways in which you can justify yourselves, when Larry does not back you up!!
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Chadwickus
If you listen to more than just the snippet it becomes quite obvious.
But that doesn't comply with the conspiracy code of conduct.
originally posted by: jabbathehut
a reply to: hellobruce
Is there a link for that somewhere?
Deputy Chief Peter Hayden Division 1 - 33 years ...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse. Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away? Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.
originally posted by: TXRabbit
How many people were involved in the Manhattan Project/A-Bomb development and talked about it......
Despite the Manhattan Project's tight security, Soviet atomic spies still penetrated the program.
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
I don't buy the OS at all. Having said that, I don't see anything here. It's weak, very thin. One little sentence that could easily be a mistake. This is fluff.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Debunkology
So it's not like slip of the tongue. This is actually reading from a paper. The notes are right there infront of his face.
Did you ever have a typo ?
Did you ever say one thing when you meant to say something else?
He even says construction started almost immediately once a plan was decided upon (paraphrasing).