It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: vjr1113
if i had no kidneys, knocked you out, attached my blood stream to yours for a dialysis type system, are you not allowed to say i dont get to live off your body? am i allowed to use your body to live?
even if a fetus was a person, one person does not get special rights to live off another person because its a fetus. you are granting special rights to a fetus that aren't granted to regular adults.
What is this? Invasion of the body snatchers?
You are comparing a fetus to an adult. A fetus is a fetus, not an adult. It didn't climb into a womb on its own accord in order to gorge on nutrients. A fetus isn't an organ, it isn't a parasite, it isn't a tumor, it isn't a person—it is a fetus, a human fetus.
When does a fetus become a person in your eyes?
I'm pro-choice, but abortion is morally despicable given the preventability of pregnancy.
originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
originally posted by: vjr1113
so if i hook up my blood stream to my mother because i have no kidneys, is she allowed to say no?
If SHE hooks you up to her blood stream...then she should be responsible enough to accept the consequences. A fetus doesn't just attach itself to someone....
The point was raised that for some, abortion IS the responsible choice...but to me it's a rather blatant cop out.
Should there be circumstances where abortion is allowed? Absolutely.
Should there also be circumstances where abortion is NOT allowed? In my opinion, absolutely!
If there are women out there irresponsible enough to run around with their legs open and ignorant enough to not use protection...they should, IMHO, at least bear the 9 months of consequence for their ignorance. The fetus did not just "attach itself" to her....she made a conscious decision and was willing to accept the consequences...but when the consequences came, she chose not to accept them...and IMO this is become all too prevalent in our society.
Kids are maturing amid a culture in which people no longer own their choices, words or actions...a culture in which there's always someone to blame for why they do what they do. From sibling aggravations at home to classroom conflict at school, kids increasingly take less responsibility for their actions and find themselves growing into young adults who fail in the workplace or other areas of their personal life because they are unable to take correction...
If you're responsible enough to have sex...you should be responsible enough to face any "problems" that arise when you do....(and no, an abortion is more like running away from a problem instead of facing it...)
A2D
PS: I love what LM posted on this page as it echoes my thoughts precisely.
I'm pro-choice, but abortion is morally despicable given the preventability of pregnancy.
originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
originally posted by: vjr1113
so if i hook up my blood stream to my mother because i have no kidneys, is she allowed to say no?
If there are women out there irresponsible enough to run around with their legs open and ignorant enough to not use protection...they should, IMHO, at least bear the 9 months of consequence for their ignorance.
I'm pro-choice, but abortion is morally despicable given the preventability of pregnancy.
is the fetus a person or not? if it is mt question stands, if not, does a non person have the right to use its host in order to live?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: superman2012
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: superman2012
a reply to: KingKelson
Not sure about when an abortion should be legal but the one time it should not be allowed is if it is being used as birth control.
I'm confused with what you mean by saying that you aren't sure when abortion should be legal then say that it shouldn't be allowed as a means of birth control. So what is the difference between legality and "not allowed"?
I mean I'm not an expert on fetuses. I don't know anything about them. I am not a woman. I should have zero say on when and if an abortion should be legal.
My post was directly about women that get one time and again because they either can't afford the kids, don't want the burden of kids, or were too stupid to use any sort of birth control.
Well how are you planning on making that determination?
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: KingKelson
At what point should it be illegal for a woman to get an abortion, if you (in general) think it should be illegal at all?
At what point?
At the point where republicans start to support birth control, expand sex education, increase funding for women's health clinics, support programs that financially assist single mothers, support paid maternity leave, and stop slut shaming.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: superman2012
Well I'm not sure if this desire to not let women using abortion as a contraceptive should be enforced legally or is just a moral qualm you are having. Because if you want it to be enforced legally, it would be very hard to enforce. Which is what I'm getting at.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: superman2012
How big of a problem do you think this actually is where there needs to be a procedure to prevent women from doing this though? I really don't think it is as bad a problem as pro-life people like to make it out to be, and I say this as someone who knows a girl who used to get abortions on the regular because she was a huge slut.
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: KingKelson
I believe the choice should be that of the woman.
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: jimmyx
"52nd trimester" ??...that's 13 years...."national 21 months" ??....that's almost 2 years....to answer your question, it's up to the mother....let me ask you.....what sort of internal surgery would you like, where other people decide if you get it or not, without your permission????
it's the woman's body, she decides....not a mythical god, not a bible, and not another person.
Except it's not just her. There is also the baby to consider.
At what point do you think a baby becomes a being we ought to consider in this equation?
if it's not born, it's not a baby yet....it's still a fetus, it's lungs are filled with liquid, and it's the mother's blood that supplies oxygen, food, water, along with the attached umbilical cord that also safely removes waste products from the fetus..... it's not a separate person.....why is this so hard to understand?
originally posted by: frostie
a reply to: KingKelson
In response to the OP,
No man, women, law, policy, order, or any authoritative action or figure,
Should EVER, EVER, tell a woman what she can or cant do with HER OWN body.
the question is, is one person forced to give up their body to someone else under ANY circumstance?