It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
It wasn't a gaffe. They didn't "lose" anyone as they were knowingly sacraficed.
She meant exactly what she said.
originally posted by: DAVID64
She didn't "lose" anyone. She knew right where they were when she allowed them to die.
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: DAVID64
She didn't "lose" anyone. She knew right where they were when she allowed them to die.
allowed them to die????........how about BUSH that allowed all those Americans to die on 9/11 ???, or BUSH that allowed all those Americans to die in the Iraq and afghan war???...or Reagan that allowed all those Americans to die in the Beirut embassy bombing???....how ridiculous
originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: Boscov
I've seen it 4 times this morning and her hot mic gaffe about Trump in what she thought was a closed mic convo with Chris Mathews.
"One of the trickier things to teach people about public speaking is that the microphone works, you don't have to actually yell," MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell told "Hardball" host Chris Matthews, noting that "there's a private version of Hillary Clinton that's very winning and very charming, that's because there's no microphone."
"When you're going up every octave with every word, people are like, I have to get some popcorn and get away from this," former RNC chair Michael Steele said. "You'd think after all the years, she would figure that out."
The former secretary of state's speaking voice has long been a topic of conversation. Various pundits, including Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward and Fox News' Geraldo Rivera, have referred to her voice as "unpleasant," "unrelaxed" and "bitter." Even Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump, who also has a tendency to raise his voice, said Clinton's "shouting" was "uncomfortable."
originally posted by: stinkelbaum
rational people would agree, from an armed forces viewpoint, nobody was lost.
trump and bernie supporters claiming a terrorist attack somehow is hillary's fault, is, like their campaigns, ridiculous.
originally posted by: JustAnObservation
Surely she counts on the fact that her voter base is too ignorant to notice her lies, or that they just won't care enough about what she says to investigate the truth. How else could she POSSIBLY have so many followers? I don't understand it one bit. That woman has a cold heart, so sad that she actually has support from people. If her mouth is open, it is probably a lie.
I mean really, did anyone in that crowd notice what she said? Are they being willfully ignorant to the fact that people did die, unnecessarily even? Do 4 lives mean so very little to her, that she might as well say "not a single person"? Surely if this were a different sort of issue, one that fit her agenda, she would have made a huge deal out of it. Say had it been four deaths of minorities via police officers. I'm sure she would not have 'forgotten' to mention that. I do not understand her one bit. If she becomes president I will be flabbergasted.
originally posted by: stinkelbaum
rational people would agree, from an armed forces viewpoint, nobody was lost.
trump and bernie supporters claiming a terrorist attack somehow is hillary's fault, is, like their campaigns, ridiculous.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
Yeah...this was taken out of context and being used like propaganda..
Hillary wasn't talking about Benghazi.
Hillary was talking about the operation to remove Gaddafi.
This is why she said Libya and not Benghazi, specifically.
Oh well, it doesn't matter though. If you don't like Hillary nothing else matters, you'll contort and "make it fit" into your hate Hillary paradigm.
Me? I don't like Hillary and wont vote for her, but I know a BS hit piece that's taken out of context and used for right-wing propaganda when I see it.