It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Has The Western Coalition Archived in Syria For Two Years?

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 04:27 AM
link   
What Has The Western Coalition Archived Achieved in Syria For Two Years compared to Russia's actions in Syria?

Russian Air Strikes
I find it rather comical, laughable to see both the Western News Media outlets, Western Paid Pundits criticizing Russia and Putin for his intervention into Syria which lasted five months.

Onto these five months in Syria, Russia has Archived more strategical gains for the Syrian Arab Army who had being fighting Saudi,Turk Proxies. Not only had they being assisting the SAA forces along the process they had helped deliver needed aid.

It seems that the more Russians air strikes were happening in every Islamist and Saudi/Turk opposition areas, the less likely would they gain areas from SAA and NDF areas.

The less they would target the minority groups.


Western Air Strikes

When the Western Coalition was targeting and bombing alleged terrorist targets what were they really targeting? for the past two years during the Western Coalition air strikes.

It seemed as if ISIS, al-Nusra Front, FSA Saudi/Turk Opposition were gaining more ground then losing them. If America and West wanted the terrorists completely eradicated they would have done it in months not years of useless empty bombings.
It seems that the western Coalition has Archived nothing.

Remember when the Russians intervened in Syria and started bombing oil trucks heading to Turkey? why couldn't the fake Western Coalition do in the beginning?

Maybe they were protecting Erdogan from the immunity.



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 04:35 AM
link   
a reply to: TaleDawn

Funny post.

You bag western media for its bias, but it appears you've bought into the Russian media's bias big time.

The western coalition wasn't doing anything to assist Assad, so how can you compare what Russia were doing with what the US were doing?

Both had their own agenda.

But of course, the Russians are the good guys here!

smh



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 04:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus



The western coalition wasn't doing anything to assist Assad

No of course not they were assisting al-Nusra Front oh and yeah John Kerry said.

Kerry: Please dont bomb al-Nusra Front
edit on 15-3-2016 by TaleDawn because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 04:44 AM
link   
Hows about providing some statistics and sources to back up your OP

Otherwise, this is just an opinion piece.



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 04:45 AM
link   
a reply to: TaleDawn

What Has The Western Coalition Archived Achieved in Syria For Two Years compared to Russia's actions in Syria?

A lot of death.

Immigration by a certain percentage of those who wish destruction of the western world.

Damage to infrastructure of Syria.

The continuation of war between fighting factions.

Training of potential terrorist operatives.

Supplying arms and technology to the previous above.

Interesting question. I think many could add to this small list.

My thoughts,

Bally.
edit on 15-3-2016 by bally001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 04:50 AM
link   
a reply to: TaleDawn




What Has The Western Coalition Archived Achieved in Syria For Two Years compared to Russia's actions in Syria?


I think they're "archiving" any proof of funding ISIS into the "top secret / FOIA proof" vault.



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 04:58 AM
link   



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 05:47 AM
link   
When I read that Putin says: "Mission complete, we can withdraw now." I really wondered what the mission's goals were then.

From all I saw a lot of parties bombed around in Syria and killed a lot of civilians.

Are you telling us now the war is over and refugees can go back? Or what was the heroic success of the Russians?



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 07:24 AM
link   
A very hard question to answer ,because of what the question might suggest . Maybe the US never had a policy to do anything positive to begin with . This latest piece connect some deep state dots foe any one watching .

By Gareth Porter March 14, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "MEE" - Jeffrey Goldberg’s newly published book-length article on Barack Obama and the Middle East includes a major revelation that brings US Secretary of State John Kerry’s Syrian diplomacy into sharper focus: it reports that Kerry has sought on several occasions without success over the past several months to get Obama’s approval for cruise missile strikes against the Syrian government. That revelation shows that Kerry’s strategy in promoting the Syrian peace negotiations in recent months was based on much heavier pressure on the Assad regime to agree that President Bashar al-Assad must step down than was apparent. It also completes a larger story of Kerry as the primary advocate in the administration of war in Syria ever since he became Secretary of State in early 2013. Goldberg reports that “on several occasions” Kerry requested that Obama approve missile strikes at “specific regime targets”, in order to “send a message” to Assad – and his international allies – to “negotiate peace”. Kerry suggested to Obama that the US wouldn’t have to acknowledge the attacks publicly, according to Goldberg, because Assad “would surely know the missiles’ return address”
www.informationclearinghouse.info... So you could say that they didn't accomplish much in one way but at the same time have given the world a picture of a country who says one thing and is really trying to do something else . Not a pretty picture though .



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 01:03 PM
link   
Many MIC/government contracts. We keep those guys rich.



posted on Mar, 15 2016 @ 09:20 PM
link   
If you look at who the main shareholders of Genie Energy are and who held the disputed territory in the Golan Heights before as opposed to who now holds it, things begin to get a bit clearer in terms of motives. Especially in regards to who isn't involved in the campaign...there's one nation in immediate proximity that would usually be right in the mix but are conspicuous by their absence.



posted on Mar, 16 2016 @ 03:56 AM
link   
So Russia, who was assisting Assad, did more to assist Assad than he West, who refused to assist Assad?

Breaking. News.



posted on Mar, 21 2016 @ 03:45 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Care to name me any achievements that the western coalition had achieved in the two year air campaign agaisnt the terrorists.

"Deaths of Commanders dont count"
edit on 21-3-2016 by TaleDawn because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
5

log in

join