It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump threatens to send supporters to Sanders events: 'Be careful Bernie'

page: 12
22
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2016 @ 01:13 AM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

You don't KNOW about Obama's background?




posted on Mar, 16 2016 @ 01:16 AM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

Not really no.

I mean I've heard a few thing here and there but for the most part nothing special.

What are you talking about specifically??



posted on Mar, 16 2016 @ 01:25 AM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

The reason you can't is because THEY ARE SEALED,schools docs are gone he has a dead guys ssn as well.
He is the most crooked man to ever be placed in office ,but he may be intelligent ,he isn't smart or deep.



posted on Mar, 16 2016 @ 01:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7

He is the most crooked man to ever be placed in office


That would be amazing to actually be the one to take that title.

I'd have to see some hard evidence of that. Everyone always says that about every president or powerful leader of something. Plus I think the most crooked man title is somewhat subjective too.



posted on Mar, 16 2016 @ 01:40 AM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

Not REALLY johnson was a bad guy, but kind of stupid.
Bush Sr. IS the senior American Oligarch,he used Cheney to run his kid. I expect evil from him ...LAWFUL even.

Nixon was crooked but NOT on Clintons level,THAT guy is a thief as is his wife ,they are ONLY about the cash.
Reagan was an idealist ,he also used Oliver North as a cut out for covert WET US operations with SOA grads. It seems OUR death squads were more efficient,we we use our own.
edit on 16-3-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2016 @ 09:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm

originally posted by: UKTruth
If they don't leave quietly and respectfully they get a beating and thrown out. If they leave quietly, Trump just takes the piss out of them.
I don't necessarily agree with the beating, but I laugh when people think it justifies the Chicago violence.


It seems you do slightly agree with them getting a beating however. Which is not ok. To be clear once again, the violence in Chicago isn't justified by anything either, certainly not what happens at other rallies and I wouldn't laugh about it either.

Protesting is justified and a protected right for people, violence isn't, period.


I posted on another thread that Reagan actually authorised any force necessary which lead to one death and 180+ injuries when a crowd gathered to protest but ended up breaking the law. He was entitled to instruct the police to use force. It always amazes me when I hear people who don't even know the history of their own country claiming Trump must be Hitler and dangerous (I don't think you said that but I have read it so many times from stupid people brain washed by the media who are trying to stop Trump get elected for their left wing buddies)


You're correct, I never said anything close to that and wouldn't say something like that. Understanding the history of this country is exactly why laws like the one Reagan made that you mention shouldn't ever happen again. Because it may seem like it's a good thing when the propaganda and media spin aid in convincing everyone it's for the best. But the fact is it's just making it legal for the State to brutalize the Public whenever it wants using that law for it's justification.

Authorizing the legal use of force against free people should be strictly controlled and monitored or you no longer have a nation with freedom and liberty as it's priorities. Like always it's a trade off between security and liberty which is why they always hype up the alleged danger people are in so they can get laws in place which take away your freedom.


I agree with the beatings if it is needed to subdue violence. If it goes over the top, then no. By over the top I mean any violence that is in excess of what is needed to remove the person and bring them to the police station to charge them

If a protester resorts to violence and it actually gets to the level of threatening the lives of others, then I think lethal force is justified.

Once a protester resorts to violence, they cease to become a protester and become a criminal (sometimes dangerous to others lives depending on their level of violence)



posted on Mar, 19 2016 @ 11:17 AM
link   
Trump threatens to send supporters to Sanders events: 'Be careful Bernie'

No Trump, NO.

Don't sink to their level.

It would make the victory that much sweeter.



posted on Mar, 20 2016 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Trump threatens to send supporters to Sanders events: 'Be careful Bernie'

No Trump, NO.

Don't sink to their level.

It would make the victory that much sweeter.


I agree - the moment he sinks to the kind of organised domestic terrorism being used against him, he will lose support.
That is what these people want, to incite more violence so that they can point the finger at Trump.

Best to just let them spew out their vile behaviour and hatred for all to see.



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join