It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Spider879
a reply to: infolurker
But where are the actual numbers on this supposed massive nationwide voter fraud, so far only the suggestions that..well maybe.. could be, but folks who did the investigation came up with dick!.
No way to tell if there is fraud if you don't know who is actually voting.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Spider879
Perhaps the OP came up with the actual number.
9%.
There has been a 9% change in voter participation since voter ID has been enacted.
Perhaps there has been systemic 9% cheating before voter ID was enforced.
Jeb Bush signed into law Florida legislation that restricted the hours and locations for early voting. “Bush and the GOP-led Legislature went the other way the next year, passing a law that capped the number of hours for early voting and confined it to election offices, city halls and libraries.” [Politifact, 11/8/12; House Bill 1567, 5/6/05]
GOP executive committee member Don Yelton dispensed with the common yarn that the voter ID push is because of genuine “voter fraud,” a circumstance that is quite rare but often alleged after the stunning Republican losses in 2012.
Read more at www.inquisitr.com...
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Spider879
Can you prove that the 9% are just disenfranchised voters and not deliberate cheats?
Voter-impersonation fraud has attracted intense attention in recent years as conservatives and Republicans argue that strict voter ID laws are needed to prevent widespread fraud.
The case has been made repeatedly by the Republican National Lawyers Association, one of whose missions is to advance “open, fair and honest elections.” It has compiled a list of 375 election fraud cases, based mostly on news reports of alleged fraud.
News21 examined the RNLA cases in the database and found only 77 were alleged fraud by voters. Of those, News21 could verify convictions or guilty pleas in only 33 cases. The database shows no RNLA cases of voter-impersonation fraud.
Civil-rights and voting-rights activists condemn the ID laws as a way of disenfranchising minorities, students, senior citizens and the disabled.
In a video that went viral in June, Republican Mike Turzai, Pennsylvania’s House majority leader, spoke approvingly at a Republican State Committee meeting of the state’s new voter ID law “which is going to allow Gov. Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania — done.”
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
a reply to: Spider879
November is months away. If you are not responsable enough to get an id, you shouldn't vote.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Sillyolme
Of course they have id.
Have to have to sign up for foodstamps, and other social programs.
The allegations of electoral fraud first emerged in 2011 when a Yale University undergraduate student looked through the signatures of the petitions that were filed with Indiana election officials to get Barack Obama qualified for the Indiana Democratic primary ballot.[17] Ryan Nees, a former Obama White House intern, pored through the “byzantine and complicated” petition signatures.[18] Page after page of the voter names and signatures in St. Joseph County turned out to be complete forgeries.[19]
The Truth About Fraud
November 10, 2007
Allegations of widespread fraud by malevolent voters are easy to make, but often prove to be inflated or inaccurate. Crying “wolf” when the claims are unsubstantiated distracts attention from real problems that need real solutions. Moreover, these claims are frequently used to justify policies – including restrictive photo identification rules – that could not solve the alleged wrongs, but that could well disenfranchise legitimate voters.
The Brennan Center carefully examines allegations of fraud to get at the truth behind the claims.
www.brennancenter.org...
In Congress, and elsewhere in the national arena, fear of fraud in elections has been revived in many
policy discussions about our voting system. In 2002, for example, allegations of widespread voter fraud
fueled disagreement over voter identification provisions in federal election reform legislation, resulting
in an acrimonious legislative process that delayed passage of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA).
Oddly enough, fraud and election integrity have been implicated in debates over terrorism and security.
The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks spurred a major legislative initiative, the Real ID Act of 2005,
which requires states to meet costly minimum security standards for drivers’ licenses that many fear will
move the country toward a system of national ID—with negative consequences for electoral participation.1
Voter ID debates currently raging across the states join the disparate issues of voter fraud and election
integrity, security against terrorist attacks, and identification requirements. Proponents argue that more
stringent ID requirements like those embodied in a “Real ID” driver’s license are needed to protect against
voter fraud at the polls, and opponents argue that voter ID is a solution in search of a problem.2
www.brennancenter.org...
originally posted by: CB328
I think it's safe to assume that is the real reason why Republicans are always pushing these laws, along with all the other types of voter misleading and suppression they do. Considering how close some recent Presidential elections have been, it's easy to see why they would want to do this.
thinkprogress.org...