It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: links234
originally posted by: grainofsand
The term 'thug' is racially neutral in the UK, is it not in the US?
I find that strange/interesting.
It was racially neutral until very recently.
The Racially Charged Meaning Behind The Word 'Thug'
Well, the truth is that thug today is a nominally polite way of using the N-word. Many people suspect it, and they are correct. When somebody talks about thugs ruining a place, it is almost impossible today that they are referring to somebody with blond hair. It is a sly way of saying there go those black people ruining things again. And so anybody who wonders whether thug is becoming the new N-word doesn't need to. It's most certainly is.
If you're not American then you're probably not going to be exposed to that side of the word, but in recent years it's a term to primarily describe young black men than simply ruffians.
The more frustrating part of this whole story is the fact that the guy who got punched was thrown to the ground by the police but the old guy was allowed to sit back in his seat. Only to be arrested some time afterwards.
originally posted by: grainofsand
originally posted by: links234
originally posted by: grainofsand
The term 'thug' is racially neutral in the UK, is it not in the US?
I find that strange/interesting.
It was racially neutral until very recently.
The Racially Charged Meaning Behind The Word 'Thug'
Well, the truth is that thug today is a nominally polite way of using the N-word. Many people suspect it, and they are correct. When somebody talks about thugs ruining a place, it is almost impossible today that they are referring to somebody with blond hair. It is a sly way of saying there go those black people ruining things again. And so anybody who wonders whether thug is becoming the new N-word doesn't need to. It's most certainly is.
If you're not American then you're probably not going to be exposed to that side of the word, but in recent years it's a term to primarily describe young black men than simply ruffians.
The more frustrating part of this whole story is the fact that the guy who got punched was thrown to the ground by the police but the old guy was allowed to sit back in his seat. Only to be arrested some time afterwards.
I agree, in the UK they all would have been arrested but the thug label would have been given to the old guy who used violence when he was at risk of no attack himself. Thug is just a generic term for someone who unjustifiably uses violence in Britain...we have just as many but we don't attribute the term to any particular race.
And then a shift happened. Thug began to be used, not so much in a different sense, but by a different group. Trayvon Martin was described as a thug. So was Michael Brown. So were those who protested Michael Brown’s death. Thug, a word once used by a sub-set of a minority community to describe itself, was suddenly being used by an elite, mostly white, mostly wealthy class to tar the entirety of a minority community. A word that was, in a sense empowering, was now being used as a shorthand for “black people doing things we disapprove of.” Historically, there have been other words used for that same purpose. That “thug” doesn’t have as long a history of obvious racism as some other words does not make its new and unfortunate meaning any less racist.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: Lysergic
What is an E-thug??
originally posted by: AmericanRealist
a reply to: xuenchen
A search for Rakeem Jones also did not turn up a criminal record in that county, but I am not really certain how their record keeping works, so we may not have access to everything. For now, whoever made that bet lost. Rakeem is clean.