78 Year old Man Sucker Punched Protestor at Trump Rally

originally posted by: KaibaTheJedi
This is hilarous! A hooligan got beat up by an old man! Seriously though, the hooligan deserved it. He went into a place where he wasnt invited and tried to shove his stuff in there, plus based on sources, he was provoking them by making gang signs/symbols. The 78 year old man was correct in what he did; the uninvited hooligan was offending the peoples views, and the man did what he did and is justified in doing so.

I bet many of you who are angry about this, probably dont even know what the knockout games were. I bet you support those too... I bet if this was reversed, you would probably say the hooligan was still innocent....

More utter nonsense, a man gets punched in the face after flipping the crowd and HE'S the hooligan.....but the person that attacked him? Oh he was right in what he did.......you people are an embarrassment to the human race, and why you'll never be taken seriously by the rest of the world.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
All I seen was a thug flashing gang signs and then he got whacked by a senior citizen. Hope his gang banger buddies all beat his ass for losing all of his street creds forever and ever to a man at geritol age.

The whooshing noise you just heard was the point of this thread sailing far, far, above your head.

The point is a video showing a gang banger thug getting owned by a man ready to die of old age.

Thank you for so massively proving my point.

That you have no clue what the thread is about or that you are trying to guide the discussion away from what is actually on the video?

Please keep posting - every one you put up continues to prove my point.

a reply to: kaylaluv

You dont seem to understand how this works.
If I pay for a venue, and invite my supporters to hear me speak then you do not have a RIGHT to disrupt that even.
This is not a matter of free speech.
The protestors disrupted Bernie and Hillary but those two are coward by protestors because they historically support protesting.
Conservatives do not support disruptive protests. They understand that Hillary and Bernie have paid for those venues and that it is rude and counter productive to disrupt those events.

a reply to: Dragoon01

You dont seem to understand how this works.
If I pay for a venue, and invite my supporters to hear me speak then you do not have a RIGHT to disrupt that even.
This is not a matter of free speech.

IT is if its open to the public, people can come protest, freedom of speech, just as the person who owns the venue is free to remove them.

They are NOT however free to assault them.

What YOU dont seem to understand is the constitution, but then again I suppose you dont support the constitution since you advocate for violence on this person.

I guess its ok to perpetrate violence on someone as long as you dont agree with them right?

The old guy was wrong to sucker punch the irritant. No problem there. But what I don't understand is why people are so upset it. The guy he punched drew attention to himself and his actions were taunting. Its not like the old guy was just walking down the street playing the knock-out game. I mean really, what kind of thug would do that?

Its only freedom of speech if it come from the right, the people who cry for smaller government,then turn around to tell others how to live there lives.

The implosion of the right is pathetic at this point.

Please stop with this "Trump supporters are racist" Bull. Just as many racist support Hillary and Sanders. There are plenty of racist Blacks and Latinos backing the Dems. There are quite a lot of anti-Semites in the Dems as well though I suspect they are not feeling the Bern.

The VAST majority of Trump supporters are just simply angry and tired.
Angry and tired of being told what to do and what to think.
Angry and tired of being shamed for not thinking the same way that the progressive left thinks.
Angry at seeing the country they grew up in ruined and decompose in the course of their lifetime.
Angry at seeing foreigners coming into this country refuse to assimilate and demand special privileges.

You dont even know the definition of racism. None of those statements even approach racism.
There are racist organizations that are backing Trump but its for their own reasons and not because he courts their approvals. He supports SOME policies that align with their own goals but that can be said about Hillary and Sanders as well. Most of these racist organizations are fine with big government and other socialist ideas as long as its their race getting the benefits.


I dont support Donald Trump because I think he is just great and totally right. In fact I honestly could care less about what his positions are. I support him because he is the giant stick in the eye to the GOP. They sold this country out. They squandered the birthright of the American people, they bent over and refused to obstruct the progressive socialist agenda. The Progressive may have murdered this country but the Republican drove the getaway car. To hell with the GOP they deserve Trump.

a reply to: Prezbo369
As you said yourself, the asshole hooligan provoked the man by flipping the bird! The man got offended by that and thus hit him. No racism involved. He knew the bird was going to get reactions, and that's why he showed it and then got hit by an old man.

What the hooligan did here is the same thing as showing up uninvited to a party and then flipping off everyone, or in simpler terms, it's like showing up in a meeting of black people and yelling the n word at them all. Same parallel.

Also it's bigots like you that are the reason the lefties have such a bad connotation of low intelligence.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

That's the point, the hooligan was baiting. The old man happened to bite.

a reply to: CrazyWater


Just jumped right to some conclusions there based off of no evidence. How shocking and progressive!

No one is saying they cant protest. They just cant do it inside while the event is going on. Your right to protest does not over ride my right to speech!
I did not make a single statement regarding the assault on the protestor. My comments were directed at the idea that the protestor was somehow given a special right to disrupt a speech that superseded that of Trump.
As a matter of fact I most assuredly support the Constitution.
You however seem to lack the understanding of the document. I never once advocated violence on this man.
His disruption did not warrant that level of violence as he was leaving the event.
That said however, had he refused to leave and continued disrupting then a level of violence to remove him would be entirely justified.
I advocate a non-aggression position however that does not mean I do not train for or support the use of violence to solve problems. It just means I will not start the fight, but I will finish it. In spite of what do gooders like to say violence does solve problems.

originally posted by: KaibaTheJedi
a reply to: Prezbo369
As you said yourself, the asshole hooligan provoked the man by flipping the bird! The man got offended by that and thus hit him. No racism involved. He knew the bird was going to get reactions, and that's why he showed it and then got hit by an old man.

What the hooligan did here is the same thing as showing up uninvited to a party and then flipping off everyone, or in simpler terms, it's like showing up in a meeting of black people and yelling the n word at them all. Same parallel.

Also it's bigots like you that are the reason the lefties have such a bad connotation of low intelligence.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

That's the point, the hooligan was baiting. The old man happened to bite.

Once again, the whooshing noise you heard was the point of the thread soaring far over your head.
Holy crap this is depressing.

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

Progressive Liberals have quite the history of telling people how to live their lives.
The difference is they have always had a huge powerful government to back up their "suggestions".

Its perfectly fine for a fundamentalist Christian politician to tell me how to live my life. I dont have to listen to him as long as the government is so weak he cant enforce it.

a reply to: CrazyWater

You are wrong. They cannot do whatever they want. They were there under false pretense. They were not there to support Trump. They had an agenda. They went to a private function.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: CrazyWater

You are wrong. They cannot do whatever they want. They were there under false pretense. They were not there to support Trump. They had an agenda. They went to a private function.

No, it was a public event. A political event. This wasn't a meeting between Trump and donors (!) this was an event open to the public.
Stop trying to move the goalposts. You're transparently bad at it.

originally posted by: KaibaTheJedi
a reply to: Prezbo369
As you said yourself, the asshole hooligan provoked the man by flipping the bird! The man got offended by that and thus hit him. No racism involved. He knew the bird was going to get reactions, and that's why he showed it and then got hit by an old man.

Flipping the bird doesn't make you a hooligan, and no matter how upset you might get due to the words or hand signs made by another, you do not have the right to lay your hands on them.....ever. This is basic stuff you really should have picked up in the first few days of pre-school.

What the hooligan did here is the same thing as showing up uninvited to a party and then flipping off everyone, or in simpler terms, it's like showing up in a meeting of black people and yelling the n word at them all. Same parallel.

Nope it was a public event in the democratic process and he had a right to protest.

Also it's bigots like you that are the reason the lefties have such a bad connotation of low intelligence.

Sheer projection on your part, and you don't get to shed that label while calling calling the victim in this case a 'hooligan'.

COMMON SENSE says that where there are large groups of people, you're going to have fights, heart-attacks, etc.. Doesn't matter if it's a big political rally, or a hockey game.

a reply to: Prezbo369
Do some research and stop getting your pants in a knot. Mr Hooligan went to a private event to purposely provoke a reaction (which he got). According to you, the old man and Trump should've bowed down to the hooligan. Please show me where it says he was invited and that this was a "public event".

If he wanted to protest, he didnt have to go inside and interrupt the meeting. He could've protested outside. Instead he chose the cowardly route of going inside and flipping the bird at everyone until bam, he got lightly hit. He deserved it. You don't go into someones house just to offend them if your not even invited. But of course, you probably think this was "racist" too...

a reply to: AngryCymraeg Your the depressing one for thinking the hooligan was innocent.

a reply to: KaibaTheJedi

Come on, you're supposed to be a Jedi. Giving the finger never warrants a sucker punch.

No matter what anyone says.

Regardless of their gesticulating.

It matters not how a person styles their hair.

You cannot, you must not, put your hands on somebody.

originally posted by: Vroomfondel
The old guy was wrong to sucker punch the irritant. No problem there. But what I don't understand is why people are so upset it. The guy he punched drew attention to himself and his actions were taunting. Its not like the old guy was just walking down the street playing the knock-out game. I mean really, what kind of thug would do that?

because security allowed the the guy that did the punching to go back and sit down in his seat....now say that a white guy was cursing out a black guy sitting down, and the black guy punched the white guy, who do you think they would have carried away????.....I'll give you a hint, every black person knows the answer...

originally posted by: KaibaTheJedi
a reply to: Prezbo369
Do some research and stop getting your pants in a knot. Mr Hooligan went to a private event to purposely provoke a reaction (which he got). According to you, the old man and Trump should've bowed down to the hooligan. Please show me where it says he was invited and that this was a "public event".

If he wanted to protest, he didnt have to go inside and interrupt the meeting. He could've protested outside. Instead he chose the cowardly route of going inside and flipping the bird at everyone until bam, he got lightly hit. He deserved it. You don't go into someones house just to offend them if your not even invited. But of course, you probably think this was "racist" too...

a reply to: AngryCymraeg Your the depressing one for thinking the hooligan was innocent.

Do some research of your own. This was not a private event. This was a political rally, ie: a public event. This was not Trump with a bunch of staff having lunch, this was an event open to the public. And the man was being escorted out. He exercised his First Amendment rights and he was leaving. That was not good enough for the man who attacked him, who whose to cold-clock him bravely from behind with an elbow strike. That's the mark of a coward by the way.
Let me stress this one more time for those who cannot understand this: he came, he protested, he was being escorted out and he was attacked unnecessarily. There was no reason to attack him, no physical or legal reason, but he was still attacked. Which is illegal, which is why his attacker received the attention of the police. Good. Perhaps he'll think better next time.