It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sources close to the process say that among those being interviewed are Chief Judge Merrick Garland of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia; Judge Sri Srinivasan, of the same court; Judge Paul Watford, of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals based in San Francisco; Judge Jane Kelly, of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals based in St. Louis; and U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who serves in Washington, D.C.
Garland, the oldest at 63, is also by far the most experienced, a moderate liberal, with a long history as a prosecutor prior to joining the appeals court in 1997. In 2013 he became chief judge of the appeals court. Widely respected, he has few political pluses for the president, as he is neither female nor a member of any minority group.
Judge Srinivasan, 49, worked in the solicitor general's office in both the Bush and Obama administrations. President Obama nominated him to the D.C. Appeals Court in 2012, and he was confirmed a year later by a vote of 97-0. He has less than a three-year judicial record, which in confirmation terms can be a plus, as now-Chief Justice John Roberts learned when he was nominated to the high court. Srinivasan was born in India and came to the U.S. with his parents as a child; if nominated, he would be the first Supreme Court nominee of South Asian descent.
Judge Watford, 48, was confirmed for a seat on the 9th Circuit in 2012 by a 61-34 vote, garnering both Democratic and Republican votes. In his three years on the court, he has earned a reputation as a smart and careful jurist; indeed, two of his opinions — one a dissent and one a majority opinion — were ultimately vindicated by the Supreme Court last term. If he were nominated and confirmed, he would be the third African-American to serve on the nation's highest court.
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Everyone knows how this is going to end. Obama is going to get exactly what he wants. Like always. The Republicans are going to make a lot of noise and do very little to actually stop him. The press is going to amplify the noise the Republicans are making to make it look like they're really trying to stop him. In the end, there's going to be yet another enemy of freedom in a lifetime appointment on the SC.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Everyone knows how this is going to end. Obama is going to get exactly what he wants. Like always. The Republicans are going to make a lot of noise and do very little to actually stop him. The press is going to amplify the noise the Republicans are making to make it look like they're really trying to stop him. In the end, there's going to be yet another enemy of freedom in a lifetime appointment on the SC.
The Senate has to approve of the new judge Obama can't just point his finger and say you are the new judge. Another enemy of freedom? I had no idea Obama was nominating tea party judges.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Everyone knows how this is going to end. Obama is going to get exactly what he wants. Like always. The Republicans are going to make a lot of noise and do very little to actually stop him. The press is going to amplify the noise the Republicans are making to make it look like they're really trying to stop him. In the end, there's going to be yet another enemy of freedom in a lifetime appointment on the SC.
The Senate has to approve of the new judge Obama can't just point his finger and say you are the new judge.