It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

2 years ago today flight , MH 370 went missing and still nothing found

page: 2
10
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 8 2016 @ 10:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: jhn7537

originally posted by: UnBreakable
a reply to: stonerwilliam

We'll see MH 370 again when it is flown into an LA high-rise office building.


Don't they know how to get to Florida?


No, that's where they let the 9-11 Saudi pilots train. They'll do a left coast attack this time for their excuse to invade another place.




posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 01:20 AM
link   
Of the hundreds of theories, most of them spawned out of pure speculation without any supporting evidence...
The one fact that remains, is that the aircraft was carrying at least one cargo container filled with Lithium Ion batteries.

Need not challenge the danger they can pose, especially with what happened last year with the hover board Lithium batteries. We witnessed them catching fire just sitting in mall stores, as well as in people's homes.

The NTSB did tests, showing how a chain reaction in these types of batteries in a cargo container could produce an epic explosion and release toxic fumes. How it was able to disable all communications on the aircraft and prevent the flight crew from reporting it IS the speculation to entertain, but in the context of a catastrophic fire and explosion. Couple that with the hundreds of dangerous incidents involving Lithium Ion batteries in aircraft that we know about, and I think it remains the most likely cause.

No need to make up stories of time slips, aliens or supposed hijackers when this scenario contains the necessary components of possibility that exist in reality. IMHO.



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 03:56 AM
link   
............News black out? Seriously? Ahem.

The crazy is strong with this thread.



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 11:09 AM
link   
a reply to: charlyv

Good points charlyv , i think most people forgot about the batteries being in the cargo bay .

But why did they say the aircraft flew on for hours according to the engine diagnostics



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 11:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
............News black out? Seriously? Ahem.

The crazy is strong with this thread.


That is why i put the thread in the Grey area , to let people throw in what ever ideas they wanted



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: St Udio

That is one scary prospect St Udio , just this morning the news was saying about chemical weapons being made by the rebels in Syria and used against the Kurds





posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 11:22 AM
link   
a reply to: charlyv

A theory that I think fits better is that a small number of 777-200s were built without certain retaining clips of some hoses in the cockpit, including the First Officers oxygen line.

One of the hull loss incidents was an aircraft at the gate that suffered a cockpit fire that burned through the side of the cockpit because of it.




edit on 3/9/2016 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)

edit on 3/9/2016 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 11:29 AM
link   
MH 370 is one heck of a mystery. How can a jumbo jet just disappear into thin air? One theory I don't buy is the 'they are saving it for another 911-style attack' because then the intel agencies would be unable to explain how they couldn't locate it.

To me the only theory that makes any sense is that the plane was accidentally downed during a military exercise, ala TWA 800. They had to cover up to avoid all the anti-military, anti-government sentiments that would have resulted.

I also think the US government, at least, knows exactly what happened. I believe they have the ability to surveil the entire surface of the world 24/7 via numerous space satellites.
edit on 9-3-2016 by starviego because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: jhn7537

originally posted by: UnBreakable
a reply to: stonerwilliam

We'll see MH 370 again when it is flown into an LA high-rise office building.


Don't they know how to get to Florida?


No, that's where they let the 9-11 Saudi pilots train. They'll do a left coast attack this time for their excuse to invade another place.


Stupid me always mixing up their training sites...



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: stonerwilliam
a reply to: charlyv

Good points charlyv , i think most people forgot about the batteries being in the cargo bay .

But why did they say the aircraft flew on for hours according to the engine diagnostics




The only thing that I think would accommodate that would be that the fire and explosion took out the communications and most likely most of the nav except the autopilot. They made an abrupt turn and descended to 25k, as would be book for a fire but were eventually overcome by the fumes. The passengers most likely all perished earlier on. It is a horrible thought, but the aircraft was able to fly on until it ran out of fuel.



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 04:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58




A theory that I think fits better is that a small number of 777-200s were built without certain retaining clips of some hoses in the cockpit, including the First Officers oxygen line.

One of the hull loss incidents was an aircraft at the gate that suffered a cockpit fire that burned through the side of the cockpit because of it.



I suppose that is a possibility as well Zaph, but would that have been so instantaneous that it took out all the comm and prevented even a mayday? If there was already a fire, and then an oxygen breach, I guess it would be like an explosion in the cockpit as well. Horrible scenario. I sure do hope that bird is found in our lifetime.



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 04:32 PM
link   
a reply to: charlyv

Commo is the last thing to handle, especially if there's a fire on board. Deal with the fire, get the airplane under control, figure out where to get on the ground, THEN worry about a mayday and telling someone there's a problem.

Aviate, navigate, communicate.
edit on 3/9/2016 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 04:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

The fire theory has been consistently ruled out

news.sky.com...

www.dnaindia.com...

They explain it properly on the air crash investigation show





EDIT: you know the case is on Interpol now too many experts signed a lawsuit that all the data was dodged
edit on 9-3-2016 by Resourceful because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 04:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Resourceful

Until the wreckage is found there are very few things that can be ruled out conclusively.

He was also talking about the batteries in the cargo hold, not the cockpit.
edit on 3/9/2016 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

This is dumb evidence I had the whole thing the proper docs (petitioned ) pinpointing exactly what data from the pings boing data radar data to I don't know what

m.themalaymailonline.com...
edit on 9-3-2016 by Resourceful because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

The show explains it kind of simple (I don't have the tech words) but they said something along the lines of

If every single electronic thing in the whole cockpit failed (like fried done and dusted) there is a back up system in the back if that fails there is one somewhere on the outside(?) if that one fails

I will go with cyber hack

EDIT (remote control - Boeing bought and has the technology pattern it has been tested somewhere in secret in Israel )

(Ever since this incident they brought out a "law" all aircrafts need to be cyber hack volnurability tested ) I would go into the battle but the competition is tough

edit on 9-3-2016 by Resourceful because: (no reason given
edit on 9-3-2016 by Resourceful because: (no reason given)
extra DIV



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 05:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Resourceful

No. There is a system to provide electrical power in the event power from the engines is lost. That doesn't work if the engines are running, or the crew is incapacitated.

There's no way to hack an aircraft, especially not that one.



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Like I said taught competition

meow



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Boeing has a password to hack and remote control the aircraft (the technology has been around since the 60's) but what the heck would I know hey

They didn't want 9/11 to ever happen again but yah
edit on 9-3-2016 by Resourceful because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 05:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Resourceful

No they don't. They patented a system, there is zero evidence it has ever been installed on any aircraft ever built.



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join