It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You need to do your own research
as I truly don't think you would accept my argument
you seem to ignore anything and everything illegal that Hillary and her aides have done.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen
Ahh yes, a link to an article that once again begs the question: Was the information in the email classified at the time, or retroactively?
You guys need to get on the ball. Regurgitating the same # over and over does not make any of it a violation of law.
If Hillary was given earth shattering information verbally by the head of another state, information that if released, would start WWIII immediately, that info, according to you would not be classified.... because no one had marked it as such yet.
Do you understand that nature of classified material?
Not at all.. Its a sign that the person in question must research it on their own in order to believe the facts of the case.
It stems from your inability to accept as fact anything coming from people who dont share your point of view.
Hence you need to research on your own so you have no one to blame for the info but the sources where it comes from and the actions of clinton and her aides that led to the media accounts in the first place.
Your response to my post is confirmation of what I just said.
information that is classified long after the fact.
You are basing your entire argument upon an empty claim.
If you can not understand this simple fact, you cannot then further be considered to have any value whatsoever in regards to the expense of time or effort put forth for which to respond.
Again, provide some proof. Give us the scoop.
You do know that certain words, regardless of their context, can cause something to be classified, right?
The information in question belongs in one of the defined categories of classification simply by it's existence, whether or not a judging body is made aware of it's existence.
When presented with evidence (Hillary's own email) that Hillary ordered Jake Sullivan to remove classification headers and send classified information over non-secure lines, you denied that it existed.
If you have to lie to make a point then you have no point.
I didn't think that I had to predict that you might call me a liar, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. Silly me.
So you do admit that Hillary Clinton ordered Jake Sullivan to strip classification headers from a document and send it over non-secure lines?
originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: Whatsreal
As we all love conspiracies, how does this go over?
Hillary got caught in the wringer and knows she is going to be a non-player, simply because she can't run or win with servergate over her head. Sanders is coming on strong but the Dems/Illuminati/Etc don't want him because he is too far from center. DOJ agrees to delay any indictments until after the convention. If Hillary quits early, Bernie wins and runs. If she holds off, the convention will be brokered and the Dems can get a more moderate ticket. The GOP will play the same game, working to keep Cruz and Trump from getting winning numbers. They broker and dump Trump and maybe Cruz, too, if his polls don't show strength. They also want centrists that people can vote for; the philosophical mismatches of McCain-Palin and Romney-Ryan are examples of astonishing political stupidity that the GOP may have now figured out.
Biden-Warren will run against Romney-Kasich, or similar, after the GOP brokers their convention and gets Donald out of the race.