It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

States with lower iq vote more heavily for Clinton

page: 8
12
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 6 2016 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Montana on the top of the list? Really? Have you ever been to Montana?

I've lived there.

The only reason it might be dark green is due to the university in Missoula, and the low population of actual human beings vs. livestock.

And Missoula? The most liberal city outside of Portland lol...barefoot hippy college kids on every street.




posted on Mar, 6 2016 @ 08:04 PM
link   
a reply to: MystikMushroom

brandongaille.com...

That and some other sources show montana just a bit down the list.



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 08:43 AM
link   
a reply to: deadlyhope

Social intelligence is what makes us human.



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 08:58 AM
link   
a reply to: deadlyhope

OK I think you don't much like Hillary Clinton. Which you could have just said without insinuating that people who do like her are dumb.



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 10:16 AM
link   
a reply to: deadlyhope

In the general elections the north east votes almost exclusively democratic also the state's around the great lakes and California. States high in college educated citizens. IQ may not be the factor you're looking for. We average about 98 nation wide. Education is a much more important factor and I guess well see in Nov which way they vote.
Right now we're only choosing who runs. The contest between blue and red comes later.



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 10:27 AM
link   
a reply to: lunatux

I didn't say it. The statistics do.

Look them up, and come up with some counter proof rather than assuming something about me, if you want to argue the premise.



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: deadlyhope

IQ measures the brains ability to learn. Knowledge is what you have learned.
Reading increases knowledge . IQ is something you're born with and cannot be changed. They can measure IQ in a very young child who has no education yet but they can't test that child for skill in academics. IQ testing that child will tell them how well he or she should do in school but can't tell whether that child will apply themselves to the situation and that is where knowledge or education will come in. A child with a lower IQ may still have a greater interest in learning which will make a different life experience.
Access to information does increase knowledge. ( but in won't increase IQ. )



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

I believe that with all my heart. I am older and did not have the world wide web until I was in my 50's. I know for a fact, my knowledge has increased because of all the researching and reading at my fingertips. Thank you. Like reading about discovering DNA, a wonder to me. And spelling, I have to look it up and learn.



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 10:41 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Mine is 128. My husband 120 our youngest 135. We are all in the high superior range.
We originated in NY now we live near D.C..
Just because I wanted to throw that in there.

In the general NY will more than likely vote blue who ever that may be. (But of course it will be Hillary.)



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Iq tests have changed over there years, Einstein used to be 200 and now is 160 supposedly. So it also depends when and on what scale people took an iq test on.



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 12:20 PM
link   
I don't want to see Clinton leading anything, but you must remember that people, super-delegates in particular vote establishment. Clinton will be on the Ballot. Sanders is to the DNC as Ron Paul was to the GOP. You will vote Clinton or Cruz and Clinton will win it. I'll make a friendly wager anytime on it.
edit on 7-3-2016 by Donkey_Dean because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Are you talking about democratic primaries only?

Red states (states that always vote republicans in office) are always the poorer states. I live in one


and can clearly see on a daily basis the mis-information and direct-actions of stupid decision making.

grrr



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 12:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Mine is 128. My husband 120 our youngest 135. We are all in the high superior range.
We originated in NY now we live near D.C..
Just because I wanted to throw that in there.

In the general NY will more than likely vote blue who ever that may be. (But of course it will be Hillary.)


That certainly is alot.




posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 06:12 PM
link   
States with lower iq vote more heavily for Clinton

Truth be told?

Clinton's party absolutely LOVES lower IQ voters.

They are the only people that buy their hydro choloro bullsnip.



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 06:58 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

No, "Clinton" and Team Clinton "absolutely love" low IQ voters. You can say "her party" all you want -just remember that Bernie is NOT a life-long Democrat.

Bernie is far, far and away above that. He's an independent.

And that shows....Bernie is winning even in "Red States". He is garnering educated people - youths (Millennials) and boomers and elders who ALL are educated and see what's happening. The only states he has lost are the deep south - where internet ACCESS is not widespread. In Iowa (more tech savvy and connected) it was A TIE.

Yeah, the "party-line Dems" are a different thing altogether than Bernie voters. Independents who promote Sanders are now obliged to vote "Democrat" because he is (wisely) caucusing with them (for now). Brilliant move. Brilliant man.


edit on 3/7/2016 by BuzzyWigs because: typos

edit on 3/7/2016 by BuzzyWigs because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

The Old School GOP just doesn't have any concept of what is going on in cyberspace this election.
They discount the twitter, facebook, social media in favor of knocking on doors and putting flyers under windshield wipers in walmart parking lots. Campaigning from the pulpit might win a few votes but the Christians I come in contact with are going to sit this one out. Trump and his nasty rhetoric has driven even die hard Christian Republicans away from the fold. My elderly mother, baptist, right wing, Reaganite hits the remote any time the Donald comes on. She calls him that "ugly SOB" and she never uses profanity.

Older women make up a huge voting demographic. The GOP just lost them thanks to Trump.


edit on 7-3-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs




And that shows....Bernie is winning even in "Red States". He is garnering educated people - youths (Millennials) and boomers and elders who ALL are educated and see what's happening. The only states he has lost are the deep south - where internet ACCESS is not widespread. In Iowa (more tech savvy and connected) it was A TIE.


Tell me another story.

www.realclearpolitics.com...



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 07:22 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12




The Old School GOP just doesn't have any concept of what is going on in cyberspace this election.


That was funny.

So Republicans are too 'dumb' to use the 'internets'!

Come July Sanders supporters are in for a RUDE AWAKENING.

And to think Sanders needs 1,883 delegates to 'win'.

Where as Clinton only needs 1,252. She's half way there.



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Those counts are including superdelegates - who can vote for whichever candidate they want when it comes down to it.
In reality, they should not be counted. They are historically inclined to 'switch and choose' depending on the "popular vote" outcomes.....

including them in her 'delegate count' is deceptive.

You're just now knowing this?
Remove the superdelegate count, and look at the delegates awarded outside of their circle....and don't think for one minute that they will all go for her.......


I pay attention to rcp myself. You have to be able to separate out the superdelegates (uncommitted) to get a clear picture of what's going on.

Or, don't bother. We don't want you to hyperventilate......gas mask or not.....



edit on 3/7/2016 by BuzzyWigs because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 7 2016 @ 07:47 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96


So Republicans are too 'dumb' to use the 'internets'!
Too many of them don't have access to the 'internets' - let alone know how to use it......

all they have is MSM tv....and we all know what that means: uninformed, low-information, media-brainwashed IGNORANCE. Not their fault. Just the only available info outlets they have.

How many "Republicans" without home internet access know they can just go to their Public Library (ew, a socialist service!) and get online? How many bother?



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join