It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
New Finds Suggest Even Earlier Trade on Fabled Silk Road
By JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
Published: March 16, 1993
The latest and most surprising discovery is strands of silk found in the hair of an Egyptian mummy from about 1000 B.C., long before regular traffic on the Silk Road and a good millennium before silk was previously thought to be used in Egypt.
www.nytimes.com...
Within a nondescript Bronze Age cemetery first discovered by Swedish archaeologists in 1934 and rediscovered by the Xinjiang Archaeological Institute in 2000, researchers have found the oldest and best-preserved mummies in the Tarim Basin area of China. Their skeletal remains, along with unprecedented artifacts, are helping solve the longstanding question of the origins of human settlement in a politically contested area of China.
Contemporary occupants of the Tarim Basin, a geographical area in the Xinjiang Uyghur autonomous region of northwest China, are both biologically and culturally diverse. The region borders numerous countries and was historically a part of the Silk Road trade route between the West and the East, so people and artifacts have moved through the Tarim Basin for thousands of years. But the origins of the inhabitants of the basin have been questioned.
One hypothesis suggests that the earliest settlers of this part of Asia were nomadic herders from the steppes of Russia and Kazakhstan, while the other suggests that people came first from the oases of Bactria, or modern Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, and Turkmenistan. While both hypotheses have support in archaeological findings such as burial customs, clothing styles, and animal bones, previous genetic evidence from human remains, which came from a cemetery called Gumugou on the eastern edge of the Tarim Basin, was
www.forbes.com... 8a423
originally posted by: SLAYER69
a reply to: Spider879
The China back then is not the China we know today.
Sounds rudimentary I know but more things have changed in China over the past few thousand years than most places on the planet. Not just talking about Governing forces but also the size, types of economy, They went from being one of the most advanced ancient cultures/explorers to introverted isolated Waring chiefdom's to Communism and one of the poorest countries to just again become one of the wealthier ones.
The history of China goes way back in ancient prehistory literally.
They have gone the whole route of development, receding power, to a Renaissance to a Cultural revolution, to crushing democratic protests, to allowing the West to export their manufacturing ofmass pollution of their rivers, land and air, of products so we can all have cheap phones...
The 5 women have studied Hebrew and Judaism in preparation for their immigration to Israel; they are from Kaifeng where a Jewish community is believed to have been founded by Iraqi or Persian Jews in the 8th or 9th century ACE.
www.ynetnews.com...
originally posted by: Spider879
a reply to: Spider879
Sorry meant to ask in the above post^ did Marco Polo reached the Americas on-board Chinese ships??
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Spider879
Fairly sure there is still doubt whether or not Marco Polo ever went to China at all - I was surprised to learn that considering he apparently stayed there for several years he never mentioned the great wall, never mentioned foot binding - sheesh, never mentioned tea. If I remember what I read correctly, he's not mentioned in any contemporary Chinese records either, so it's a little bit of a grey area.
originally posted by: Spider879
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Spider879
Fairly sure there is still doubt whether or not Marco Polo ever went to China at all - I was surprised to learn that considering he apparently stayed there for several years he never mentioned the great wall, never mentioned foot binding - sheesh, never mentioned tea. If I remember what I read correctly, he's not mentioned in any contemporary Chinese records either, so it's a little bit of a grey area.
But Ibn Batutta gave the first mention of the great wall and we all know there were other visitors before him.
What little is known of Huishen is recorded in the Liang Shu (the chronicle of the Chinese Liang dynasty) in fewer than 750 characters. Originating in Kabul, Huishen fled to China to avoid religious persecution. He is reported to have sailed from China in AD 458, returning in 499 to tell the Emperor and the court historian of his travels. No reason is provided for Huishen's journey, although missionary work is a possibility. Given the length of his travels (around 10,000 miles) and some of the recounted details, Huishen is believed to have reached not only British Columbia (there is a legend on Haida Gwaii of an Asian monk who spent more than a year on the islands), but sailed down the coast to Central America.