It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Prediction - The Largest Voter Fraud In US History

page: 1
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 10:10 AM
link   
I predict the largest case of voter fraud in the history of the United States starting today going through the 2016 election.
It already started on Super Tuesday. The GOP party is going to use all tactics to stop Donald Trump.

After reading this:




Their angry reactions, in the 24 hours since Mitt Romney and John McCain urged millions of voters to cooperate in a grand strategy to undermine Mr. Trump’s candidacy, have captured the seemingly inexorable force of a movement that still puzzles the Republican elite and now threatens to unravel the party they hold dear.


Link

I am convinced the GOP is desperate and will pull out all unethical options.

Skipper

edit on 5-3-2016 by SkipperJohn because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 10:12 AM
link   
a reply to: SkipperJohn

Bush v gore happened all ready



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 10:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Looselungjones

This will be bigger then that.



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 10:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: SkipperJohn
I predict the largest case of voter fraud in the history of the United States starting today going through the 2016 election.
It already started on Super Tuesday. The GOP party is going to use all tactics to stop Donald Trump.

After reading this:




Their angry reactions, in the 24 hours since Mitt Romney and John McCain urged millions of voters to cooperate in a grand strategy to undermine Mr. Trump’s candidacy, have captured the seemingly inexorable force of a movement that still puzzles the Republican elite and now threatens to unravel the party they hold dear.


Link

I am convinced the GOP is desperate and will pull out all unethical options.

Skipper


Ya, it's already happened, as someone else referenced. In 2000 the popular vote was ignored in lieu of an antiquated electoral college process, hanging chads, and an ultimate choice by Scalia, which gave us Dubya. Not that Gore would've been any better. But this shows the voters choice is ignored if the elites don't like our choice. As Stalin put it:




posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 10:53 AM
link   
It's going to be hard to do this time because it is not anywhere near close. The gap between Trump and any of the others is so wide that a few "hanging chads" won't make any difference. If they get too desperate, Donald will have more than fraud to worry about. Stay safe DJT.



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 10:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
It's going to be hard to do this time because it is not anywhere near close. The gap between Trump and any of the others is so wide that a few "hanging chads" won't make any difference. If they get too desperate, Donald will have more than fraud to worry about. Stay safe DJT.


Right now, nothing to worry about. But after a brokered GOP convention in Cleveland where the establishment picks an alternative to DJT, all but ignoring the popular vote for the GOP nominee, all hell will break loose.



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:00 AM
link   
Already happening with Hillary vs. Bernie



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Puppylove
Already happening with Hillary vs. Bernie


Well, it's already known that the DNC ignores the Dem popular votes, and the party establishment awards "Superdelegates" to the party establishment favorite. Debbie Wasserman Schultz already said as much. And not a peep from Dem voters.

"Jake Tapper Confronts Wasserman Schultz on the Charge Dem Superdelegates ‘Rig’ the Process"



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:28 AM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable



In 2000 the popular vote was ignored in lieu of an antiquated electoral college process

Uhhh, no. Asa we live in a Republic and not a true Democracy (mob rule) the election process played out PRECISELY as our founding fathers set it up /. Each state has a set number of electoral votes. The electoral votes are pledged in the percentage of the popular vote in each state. American Civics Course for today.




posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:31 AM
link   
I agree. The GOP should pull it off easily considering all the practice they've had.



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

And not a peep from Dem voters. 

I guess they know their place, huh?

Sad.



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: UnBreakable



In 2000 the popular vote was ignored in lieu of an antiquated electoral college process

Uhhh, no. Asa we live in a Republic and not a true Democracy (mob rule) the election process played out PRECISELY as our founding fathers set it up /. Each state has a set number of electoral votes. The electoral votes are pledged in the percentage of the popular vote in each state. American Civics Course for today.



Uhhh, no. I'm fully aware of the purpose of the electoral college process and how it was originally set up . No need for the snarky civics course reference, Jackwagon.

"So, is the Electoral College antiquated? If we view elections through the “progressive” lens of nationalism that dominates political thought and discourse today we would have to conclude that it is. The Electoral College, divorced from the founding principle of federalism, makes no sense to most Americans today".
www.thegreatfiction.com...

"This system needs to be put to an end. The American people are well enough informed to elect their own president without the aide of an Electoral College. The electors in the Electoral College do not actually make decisions anyway. They are just figurative for they should vote along their state’s popular vote, even though most are not legally bound to do so".
www.public.iastate.edu...



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

So, you are perfectly fine with enormous pockets of a particular ideology controlling forever the election of a president. In other words, would you want New York City to elect your president every cycle, because that is what would happen. Towns in the Midwest or Southwest or areas of the South or ....heck...Billings, MT may as well not vote.



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:54 AM
link   
a reply to: SkipperJohn

I can't disagree, since we've already seen it with the democrats.

The republicans will do whatever it takes to knock Trump off the ballot.



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:56 AM
link   
a reply to: SkipperJohn

Yeah, but this is the United States of America! We don't rig elections!



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 12:04 PM
link   
Not in TX, the new voter ID law is working wonders
edit on 5-3-2016 by avgguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 12:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: UnBreakable

So, you are perfectly fine with enormous pockets of a particular ideology controlling forever the election of a president. In other words, would you want New York City to elect your president every cycle, because that is what would happen. Towns in the Midwest or Southwest or areas of the South or ....heck...Billings, MT may as well not vote.



Ok, I will address your example. New York City has a voting population of @4.5 million, give or take. Let's assume they all vote for the same candidate. Midwest states include Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas with a total population of @68 million. Let's just say 10% of them are voters 6.8 mil> 4.5mil. Your example doesn't hold water.

New York: www.elections.ny.gov...
Midwest:research.stlouisfed.org...



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 12:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: Puppylove
Already happening with Hillary vs. Bernie


"Jake Tapper Confronts Wasserman Schultz on the Charge Dem Superdelegates ‘Rig’ the Process"


WTF was that double speak??

To paraphrase:
We have superdelegates to prevent our candidates from running against grass roots activists. Then in the same breath, we democrats, highlight and emphasize inclusiveness and diversity to ensure grass roots activists can participate.

You cant make this stuff up. SMH



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 12:27 PM
link   
a reply to: SkipperJohn


Naw. I disagree with your prediction. You can see the handwriting on the wall already and that invisible hand that writ being at the end of the Republican bosses. Romney's speech is just the beginning. He will rise up to overcome. McCain, the war monger, though, just won't give up his aspirations. Romney will even appeal to a lot of disappointed Democrats as he seems reasonable.



posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 12:28 PM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

Your counter example assumes all those other states will vote for the opposite candidate as well. It doesn't hold water.

Our electoral college process allows each state to have a voice rather than the states with the majority of the population. So, candidates need to actually get out and campaign in the various states to win that state's popular vote. And their delegates are pledged to cast their vote for the candidate the people voted for. They don't have to, but almost always they do.




top topics



 
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join