It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ad-blockers, subscriptions and money? ATS is worth $2 million and makes $466,920 a year

page: 9
63
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: blupblup

Oh..Jesus




posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raxoxane
Oh..Jesus


Jesús.



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: verschickter

How much does it or has it cost you to be a member here at ATS?


Edited for content and
edit on 4-3-2016 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 02:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Realtruth

Man learn to read and comprehend not only one post but try to remember what the one said you try to talk down.

I donated.
I am willing to pay a monthly fee.

But not for the "product" ATS is now. Got it now?

Edit: I also provided free coding help to ATS.
So what are you trying to say about me here?
That I´m whining around? Then you get the wrong impression.

The only thing that pisses me off currently is when people like you put words in my mouth.
Way to go




If things piss you off that much about ATS where you can't stand the site, bugs, errors, staff, owners, members, money being made or not the log out button is easy to use. And you never have to return and surround yourself with such absolute misery and chaos.

My whole point was about the bugs and then some thoughts on financial decicions. Never ever did I complain about
mods, members, the site iself or all the other things your are trying to put in my mouth.


I hope you understand what you did.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


And finally, I have no problem spending 12$ a year if, yeah if (but never will happen as of how it looks now) the site is as usable as any comparable other website, when it comes to nasty bugs.

edit on 4-3-2016 by verschickter because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: verschickter

My apologies if I miss read or understood your content.

It's wonderful you offer free coding and thanks! I'm sure lots of people do free things here on ATS. Like the Mods, Staff and members.

You aren't the only one.

People bring stories here and spend hours and hours on content. Guess what they get paid?

It's about a group effort. Yea there is going to be bugs, bad content, fights, arguments and more, but in the end it costs nothing to contribute.

But coming on here and bitching about small things is it helpful or destructive?
edit on 4-3-2016 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Realtruth

My own quote in case you missed it.


My whole point was about the bugs and then some thoughts on financial decicions. Never ever did I complain about mods, members, the site iself or all the other things your are trying to put in my mouth.


Im not even "bitching" that bugs are there. That´s what you don´t understand. Errors happen. What I do not understand is that there are important bugs to fix but rather than doing that (with solutions on hand), 7 months after providing the solutions, they start to mess around with the design, as looks would be more important then function.

Of course the owners can decide to go full payment memberships. I´m ok with that. My mere concerns are for the good of ATS if you would try to understand me. You can´t sell an unfinished buggy product to someone. And that´s not only me complaining about if you had read the thread, at least four other peoples expressed their concerns that nothing is ever fixed. They only intruduce new half baked stuff. Main thing it works half way, on to the next task. That shows how the "developer" of this site works. And that alone tells you many things about a person.

Had you not added the last line, I would be totally fine with your post.


edit on 4-3-2016 by verschickter because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 03:17 PM
link   
I keep following these various threads as they pop up and i never hear anyone ask why they decided to start this ad block assualt on the very same day as dozens of other websites across the web. id like to know who is pushing this agenda behind the scenes and why ATS is willing to go along with it. i know it means more money for them but it cant just be a coincidence that this came down the pipe at the same time.
edit on 4-3-2016 by TheScale because: grammar



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: TheScale

More people than you think noticed. I highlighted your post on the other thread/or page where you first said that.
Also on other places, people start to ask ;-)



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 03:30 PM
link   
as long as the content remains free there is no harm in offering a paid for no advert option. As soon as the content is not free this is when the site will die. i think the owners are clever enough to understand this.

been coming to ATS for years and will continue to do so. I'm more of a watcher than a contributor............



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 03:55 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight
We are literally their business and provide them with their product. They simply setup a market (ok not simply) and are now asking for us to be monetary investors.



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 04:17 PM
link   
I am not impressed by any of this. I know, everybody wants to make some money. Why not ATS?
But I don't need ATS. And if they don't want me to use add Blockers than I don't use ATS.

It's as simple as that.
edit on 4-3-2016 by Siddharta because: use and need



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Siddharta

But still, I suppose you use one now. So that means you have one active right now. At least have to balls to admit it ;-)



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: verschickter

Of course, I have one active. And I don't even need balls to admit it, because I think, only fools have none.

edit on 4-3-2016 by Siddharta because: deleted an a



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 04:42 PM
link   
Thanks.....seems my post has been removed for some reason?
Did anyone see anything warranting such action?
Or has, for the lucky few that caught it, a point been proven
a reply to: NihilistSanta


edit on 4/3/2016 by AlphaPred because: (no reason given)

edit on 4/3/2016 by AlphaPred because: Added something



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 04:49 PM
link   
Hehehe....gonna find myself banned for asking questions and pressing a point



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 04:53 PM
link   
a reply to: AlphaPred
How are you banned in anyway while you are still posting?
Could it be that you are followed by aliens and we all don't realize your horrors?


edit on 4-3-2016 by Siddharta because: added an l



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 05:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Siddharta

So you´re saying women are fools



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 05:32 PM
link   
I agree with you on that.
can some one give us a list of other good conspiracy sites please.

If this site did go pay to Post!
then it will die!


originally posted by: TheScale
I keep following these various threads as they pop up and i never hear anyone ask why they decided to start this ad block assualt on the very same day as dozens of other websites across the web. id like to know who is pushing this agenda behind the scenes and why ATS is willing to go along with it. i know it means more money for them but it cant just be a coincidence that this came down the pipe at the same time.


edit on 4-3-2016 by buddha because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 05:37 PM
link   
One thing that I can tell folks is that those internet "net worth of individual or entity " sites are grossly off on their speculations.

I used to work as a bookkeeper for a few celebrities. One day I went to one of those websites and looked up a client. (no I won't say which one) and it said he had a net worth of 2.5 million. I know exactly what his net worth was at the time including all of his assets and it was 1/5th of what they estimated.

So I wouldn't take everything you read off the internet as accurate when it comes to worth of an entity.

edit on 4-3-2016 by BASSPLYR because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-3-2016 by BASSPLYR because: fixed typos and changed sentance structure to make more sense.



posted on Mar, 4 2016 @ 05:41 PM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR
So the person had around 166.666,66 $.

Or 37.500.000,00, depending how to understand that sentence

edit on 4-3-2016 by verschickter because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
63
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join