It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Canada is to the USA as an Intel Celeron is to a Pentium 4!
Originally posted by JoeDoaks
Amuk
you are OUT OF LINE
Then you are a liar too.
As MOD you are VERY out of line.
Oaths? How about the ATS TOS?
What is an oath anyway? It is a verbal promise or agreement.
The DESERTERS left for whatever their own reasons are. Are they cowards? jsobecky, Amuk and some others seem to think so. I don't. We disagree. I'll explain my reasons below.
A father of two small children, wife expecting another, asks his C.O. (commanding officer) to not extend him until after his wife gives birth because she has no family or friends that can help her.
The C.O. Refuses.
The man has already completed HIS original commitment and agreement.
His wife will suffer mental anguish at the very least, she may miscarry or die.
His unit will do whatever the unit was going to do with or without him.
Who does he owe the highest duty to?
Originally posted by jsobecky
The majority of them wait until they are back home to desert, because of how easy it is to skip into Canada. What does that tell you?
But most importantly, they do not stand and face the consequences of their decisions. This implies a lack of maturity and is a total breakdown in discipline. The military cannot function without discipline.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Seekerof:
Arent they the same thing? Deserters and criminals?
But the real irony here is: Mexicans and Canadians all seem to come to the US. So its like an exchange program!! We send our criminals and deserters and they send us our laborers and hockey players.
To me, it's the same as breaking a contract. If we could all break any contract we entered into, without consequences, then our society would fall apart.
Originally posted by jprophet420
To me, it's the same as breaking a contract. If we could all break any contract we entered into, without consequences, then our society would fall apart.
even though i just got done disproving said contract?
then you can come home and be tried by a biased military court that does not recognize that it is breaking the law to begin with.
i think the real cowards are the ones who kill people becasue it is easier to follow an order to fight in war rather than question the autority of the command to begin with. derived from the information given in this thread, it is thier job to NOT fight.
Originally posted by donquad2001
i only comment is you have no right to judge others for their actions until you are in his shoes and then you still cannot because all humans have freedom of choice in their heart.
Originally posted by c00ster
Canadians are always quick to criticize Americans, but the only tough guys in the whole country make up a few hockey teams! Dont be insulted though, I love your general philosophy of life, and am quite envious of most of it. Canada does have some great government policies, ie; healthcare etc.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by jprophet420
To me, it's the same as breaking a contract. If we could all break any contract we entered into, without consequences, then our society would fall apart.
even though i just got done disproving said contract?
I have no idea what you mean by that. Disproving a contract? What does that mean?
then you can come home and be tried by a biased military court that does not recognize that it is breaking the law to begin with.
But you would be more than happy to take advantage of that "biased" military court if it were to work in your favor, right?
Besides, you are making a totally irrational judgement on the military court. You have no way of knowing whether they are biased or not.
i think the real cowards are the ones who kill people becasue it is easier to follow an order to fight in war rather than question the autority of the command to begin with. derived from the information given in this thread, it is thier job to NOT fight.
The authority of the command is not in question. If you refuse to follow an order, that is insubordination.
Those who think that it is OK to break an oath and not face consequences are not only cowards, but they are undisciplined and immature. They were not brought up right. Mommy and daddy cleaned up after them all their lives; that's why they cannot understand the seriousness of consequences.
These are the same people that cry out for the administration's head when they think they have broken some rule. The grownups have to follow the rules, not the deserters, right?
I guess there has to be at least one parent in the playground, though.
i made 3 posts, read them. they only break the rules by deserting. they break no rules by NOT fighting and they break rules by accepting the illegal commands of their officers. please pay attention to what i say before you discredit it, thanks.
Originally posted by jsobecky
i made 3 posts, read them. they only break the rules by deserting. they break no rules by NOT fighting and they break rules by accepting the illegal commands of their officers. please pay attention to what i say before you discredit it, thanks.
This thread is concerned only with the issues of deserting. That is illegal and cowardly.
Whether the war, and according to you, any orders emanating as a result of it, are illegal, is subjective at best.
Originally posted by jprophet420
i never debated the fact deserting was illegal, as far as cowardly goes - go sign up for the war if you dont want to be a coward. by NOT FIGHTING IN THE WAR YOU ARE AS COWARDLY AS ALL WHO DESERT. if you feel it is dishonorable
becasue they signed up and then reniged then enjoy the freedom of having your own opinion.
You want to enjoy the benefits and protection of the same flag that you feel you have the right to burn, and do not want to risk your life defending.