It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Justice Dept. grants immunity to staffer who set up Clinton email server

page: 2
29
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 10:57 PM
link   
The little birdies are starting to chirp!!!

The next few weeks will be very interesting....

Tick tock goes the FBI Investigation clock.....




posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 11:17 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

You think Obama's Loretta Lynch will move forward?



posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 11:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: RickinVa

You think Obama's Loretta Lynch will move forward?


She better. But, she did serve as a U.S. Attorney under Bill Clinton. And she did support Hillary initially in 2008 and I'm sure she supports her now.

All eyes are on this investigation though. We will see if she can put her personal biases aside and do the right thing for the country. We're watching.



posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 11:38 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

He was granted immunity?

What's the point of having any laws, if the government cant be held accountable.

Interesting, they believe they are so privilege that they can break any law they want, and thumb their middle fingers at the rest of us.

No wonder people are voting for Trump, they are hoping he can make a different's against a corrupt cabal.
edit on 2-3-2016 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 11:38 PM
link   
I'm surprised she's even allowed to run for the dem nomination while this is over her head.

If she gets it and this falls on her... then isnt the party pretty much screwed?



posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 11:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Pagliano is not government, he was merely a staffer. He has information that the feds want.

Granting immunity to lower level personnel means they can no longer use the 5th amendment as protection and ensures cooperation in an investigation that may (or may not) reveal improper conduct by the actual target of the investigation.

Immunity in this case is a good thing.



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: seagull

She could try to claim her husband as vice president.
Dems like that stuff.



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 12:19 AM
link   
a reply to: NiteNGale2

Thank you for that information, I was not aware of that.



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 12:22 AM
link   



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 01:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe


Weeks end?, I say give it 3 days and he will accidentally slip in his bathtub and break his neck.



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 04:16 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I think we will soon see how 'persuasive' Hillary is with her staffers.
I can just hear her telling the prospective scapegoats how everything will be fine and they just need to follow her script.
If we see a few more accept immunity in exchange for testimony, then we will know just how solid the FBI's case is.



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 08:32 AM
link   
Something from the Washington Times.


But prominent legal scholar Jonathan Turley said the report, if true, is not good news for Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner.


Here is what Jonathan Turley had to say about it:

“DOJ does not give immunity without something valuable from a potential target like Bryan Pagliano. The situation just got more precarious,” tweeted Mr. Turley, a law professor at the George Washington University.



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 08:37 AM
link   
This article from December 2015 in Politico reminds us that Bryan Pagliano ... or someone did some email scrubbing on a government server.



The State Department has told Senate investigators it cannot find backup copies of emails sent by Bryan Pagliano, the top Hillary Clinton IT staffer who maintained her email server but has asserted his Fifth Amendment right and refused to answer questions on the matter.

State officials told the Senate Judiciary Committee in a recent closed-door meeting that they could not locate what’s known as a “.pst file” for Pagliano’s work during Clinton’s tenure, which would have included copies of the tech expert’s emails, according to a letter Chairman Chuck Grassley sent to Secretary of State John Kerry that was obtained by POLITICO.

The department also told the committee the FBI has taken possession of Pagliano’s government computer system, where traces of the messages are most likely to be found, according to the letter.


Edit to add: Maybe the information that Pagliano has relates to what person told him to delete emails from a government system?
edit on b000000312016-03-03T08:43:59-06:0008America/ChicagoThu, 03 Mar 2016 08:43:59 -0600800000016 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 09:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Dead before weeks end....


What does Vegas say?


Suicide, Car Accident, or Surprise medical issue?



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

even if she is indicted I`m sure a lot of her supporters will still vote for her.
reminds me of the democrat mayor of Washington D.C. (marion barry) who was convicted and sent to prison on drug charges. When he got out he ran for mayor again and was re-elected. It seems that a lot of people don`t care who rules over them.



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

Ties in with the question of Cheryl Mills retaining her top secret clearances because Hillary had her working on some "research" after they both exited the State Department.

Bet this guy Pagliano knows exactly what they were doing before Hillary was forced to turn over her system to the SD and the FBI.




posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 11:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Dead before weeks end....


What does Vegas say?


Suicide, Car Accident, or Surprise medical issue?


Could be an over-under bet.

Like 30 days.




posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 11:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: RickinVa

You think Obama's Loretta Lynch will move forward?


If it becomes clear Hillary is not going to win the election she'll be sliced and diced in a heart beat.



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 12:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen


It's also possible Hillary herself has immunity and maybe a few others.


they would never grant immunity to Hillary, she's the main malfeaser. the purpose of the investigation is (theoretically) to get her as she was in charge.

key player is Obama. if he owes the Clintons, or thinks well of them, nothing will come of this. if he decides he's had enough of Billary he will allow his DOJ people to follow the evidence.



posted on Mar, 3 2016 @ 12:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Jason88




he's willing to testify since he is in protective custody with immunity, right?


Not in protective custody at this time. Folks are calling for it however...







 
29
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join