It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's not the chemtrails that do the damage, but the simple belief in them I think.
The fact that it's not done kind of proves the point in the OP.
originally posted by: OpenMindedPhilosopher
a reply to: network dude
Sorry but I think you may be wrong on one thing. I could probably prove so if I did some research I just woke up and am feeling lazy so I'll give my opinion. I don't think the exhaust, or product, from burning that much jet fuel would simply be ice crystals up there. Think about when an old truck gasses it and smoke goes everywhere..planes must burn a lot of jet fuel it can't be healthy stuff coming out of those engines? Just a thought. And also I think it's weird some days there isn't a cloud or plane in the sky and some days there are trails everywhere you can't see any blue sky...
originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: network dude
Over and over again we hear about how our government has, over the decades, preformed harmful testing on unsuspecting citizens. Just yesterday was a disturbing story here on ATS about implanting chips into the brains of servicemen, giving them little choice.
So you go on believing your government would never place anything harmful in the air in the way of chemtrails. While convincing yourself, have a tall cool glass of floridated water, courtesy of the good old USofA. Better yet, go to Flint and drink their tap water...over floridated ice.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: network dude
You must be bored.
I saw the thread title and was waiting for hilarity to ensue. Now I'll have to wait for angry responses for the hilarity.
Boo.
ETA: nevermind, the hilarity started.
originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: network dude
As I have said before. I would not pay the whole cost but I would gladly donate.
Anyone?
originally posted by: network dude
I am sorry about that.
In retrospect, it was hugely unfair. so in order to rectify that, I present:
Unequivocal proof.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: network dude
If the likes of mr Wiggington did it and proved there were chemtrails, he could potentially make a fortune. Yet people like him don't. They're more content with the continous income from selling books, going to seminars etc.
There's no money in the truth
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: network dude
If the likes of mr Wiggington did it and proved there were chemtrails, he could potentially make a fortune. Yet people like him don't. They're more content with the continous income from selling books, going to seminars etc.
There's no money in the truth
I'd love to put Wiggington on the spot with that. I think the only way to do it, would be to go to one of his paid speeches and pop that one during the Q&A. If you had the data handy as far as pricing, flight availability, and testing procedures, you could make him look exactly like the charlatan he is in front of a crowd of his followers. It would be priceless, but would likely not happen.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Ksihkehe
So "Just look up man!!" isn't enough for you?
OK, then would you believe.........
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Ksihkehe
So "Just look up man!!" isn't enough for you?
OK, then would you believe.........
I can look up, but I'd feel much more comfortable dedicating my life to a cause if it had a great deal of ideas based on a misunderstanding of science behind it. Could you give me some loosely connected ideas that could convince me?