posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 09:49 AM
a reply to: Joneselius
My question, keeping the first point in mind, is this: How do you reconcile your two choices now (lets be honest, that's what it is now) for
We have unlimited choices in who we vote for. Gary Johnson for the Libertarian Party is a much better option than anyone running on an R or D ticket.
I'm expecting Jill Stein will run for the Green Party. We can always write in the candidate of our choice as well. If folks feel the R and D
candidate are their only choices, they are limiting themselves.
Which is really the problem, isn't it? The limits voters put on themselves?
Does it worry you at all that the two options now being padded (Hillary and Trump) are BOTH provably psychopathic, BOTH are provably
Narcissistic and BOTH have pasts mired in more controversy than even the most corrupt of political figures - even people like Assad?
Of course it does. I've been worried for a couple decades now... Especially because so many folks limit themselves to those two choices so we keep
getting the same crap. What does that say about those voting? To paraphrase: The political definition of insanity is voting for the same critters
over and over again and expecting different results.
edit on 2-3-2016 by Boadicea because: formatting