It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Environmental Movement Hijacked And Turned Into A Human-Hating Cult

page: 1
25

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 05:05 AM
link   


This guy seems to be genuine. In spite of the claims made to the contrary it seems his story is factual. Although a former friend considers him a sell-out, they say the story of his involvement at the start of Greenpeace is true. Various sources confirm his story.

The most basic message I get from this is the environmental movement was hijacked and turned into a human-hating cult. This is obvious when people express their opinion that humans are a curse to the Earth.

When discussing human fatalities due to deer on the road I was told it would be better if the deer were here and we weren't. No balance concerning the fact there are now more deer in the British Isles than at any time since the ice age, and we've removed the predators and have to take their place in creating balance.

Any thoughts?




posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 05:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Kester
I came to the conclusion a ong time ago, all campaign poltics is an elaborate excuse for hating other people and feeling virtuous about doing so.
"Our cause is righteous, therefore those people over there are evil".



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 05:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Kester



Any thoughts?


I think the high priests of the Church of Warmingology (as it seem now the "most" important environMENTAL issue) will come here in no time and shred you apart for such heresy.



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 06:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Kester

The environmental movement has always held an appeal for the profoundly misanthropic; however, the movement as a whole seeks to integrate humanity with its environment in a mutually beneficial way.



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 06:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: PeterMcFly
a reply to: Kester



Any thoughts?


I think the high priests of the Church of Warmingology (as it seem now the "most" important environMENTAL issue) will come here in no time and shred you apart for such heresy.


This is an example of the other pole of misanthropy: contempt for science and good intentions.



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 07:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: PeterMcFly
a reply to: Kester



Any thoughts?


I think the high priests of the Church of Warmingology (as it seem now the "most" important environMENTAL issue) will come here in no time and shred you apart for such heresy.


This is an example of the other pole of misanthropy: contempt for science and good intentions.


Contempt for science, no. That's why the climate zealots try to 'shred' dissenting voices. They want to present the appearance of having science on their side, when actually all they have are flawed computer models.

Contempt for good intentions, possibly. Especially when 'good intentions' include preventing third-world economies from developing their energy resources and suppressing the development of their populations. Especially when tax dollars subsidize non-competitive 'green energy' and prevent true innovation that could make new energy sources truly viable.



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 07:55 AM
link   
Back in the days when Green Peace formed there was still sentiment about such issues as environmental pollution, wildlife and health.

Issues such as the War in Vietnam, Chemical spraying of pesticides like DDT, saving whales, seals and owls, chopping down old growth forests. People got behind this stuff, these issues were of a personal nature, specific and focused.

Nowadays the issues are vague. Jet exhaust (insert pet argument), Global warming or Climate change…

How does one effectively protest about the stratosphere, the weather, melting ice or sea levels, lol?

Thats why these issues are promoted. For or against, take your side, bicker endlessly.

Meanwhile millions die in endless wars, burdensome debt, pollution and poverty.

Carry on…
edit on 1-3-2016 by intrptr because: spelling



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 10:11 AM
link   
If you want to know the true agenda of an activist group you simply need to find out who funds them.
He who pays the piper ....



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 10:29 AM
link   
People need a group to hate humanity?

I came to that conclusion all on my own!



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 10:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

good intentions.



that is the punch line for me. carbon credit scams, unrealistic lines in the sand and suffocating regulations and penalties on world powers that aren't even the bulk of the global problem cannot be considered "good intentions".



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: corvuscorrax
People need a group to hate humanity?

I came to that conclusion all on my own!



Save for those indigenous people of the forest that await the space brothers to come save the rain forest ect. They get the poison for their weapons from frog juice and stuff. They shrink heads.....but don't use hot water from nuclear reactors to do it.



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Kester


Science and logic no longer held sway.


That is from the video, and man, that is true for a lot of "movements" these days. It always sounds good, and the science that is used can be shown to be verifiable, but it's hardly the whole picture, and when logic is applied overall, the movement is seen for what it is--the use of sensationalism, misinformation, and fear.

He's not just describing the evolution of Greenpeace and environmentalism, but many branches of 'activist science.'



posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   
I only wish the extremist's intense hatred of mankind incuded themselves enough for them to "be the change they want to see in the world" and lead by example in ridding the earth of their own little bit of "human cancer".



new topics




 
25

log in

join