To me it doesn't matter if it was Halliburton or Wal-Mart that he bought them at. I'm not American, and couldn't give a rat's behind about
Halliburton or Cheney. I know a whole bunch of people here don't like them, but aside of the whole FBI contract investigation thing, I'm pretty
clueless about them. On the positive side, for those who like Cheney, he didn't work for Halliburton then, so this doesn't reflect on him in any
way at all.
Please do not jump to conclusions, when they are entirely unwarranted, and do not assume others think in the same way you do. I have never even so
much as typed the word Halliburton on ATS before this post, and if you have information about this that could clear up my perceived misunderstanding
on this issue, then by all means, share it. The main reason I posted this here was because coverage of this is extremely limited, the only places it
seems to have been reported is in NM and BC, and I would like to know more about this case.
Thank you to Vahall for pointing out the information about AA and its sale. But in the link posted it does mention that the sale of JRC was finalized
on the same day (early 1994) that Hudak purchased the items in question, so I was already aware of that. If the items were offered before the deal
was final the previous owners need to take some responsibility, as well as the people who bought it. These things should not be available for sale to
the public, and I was surprised to hear that you can buy these kinds of things for that little money. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt
here, and presume you actually read the links provided, in full, before responding.
And if it is as you say, and that these weapons were not sold by JRC, then the judge will throw the lawsuit out of court, and maybe then we can find
out who did sell them, and find out if there are any more unnaccounted for demolitions floating around wtih big NATO stamps on them. Someone sold
ordanance designed for use by the US Military that should have been destroyed under destruction/disarmament clauses, in the contract the company
My concern is that someone was selling demolition material to people who don't live in your country, and said material turned out to be completely
illegal for him to own. The only reason Hudak even got off is because he was able to argue that he was misled about the nature of the items he
purchased. Here is another link, this time regarding the testimony of Michael Hambright where he describes the items he sold to Hudak as
shoulder-launched multipurpose assault weapons
Oh, and ps, I have yet to click on any thread dealing with the NWO since I joined here, and do not forsee such an event happening in the near
edited to add that I did actually type Halliburton twice, I think, while searching ATS to make sure there wasn't already a thread about this. I like
to be honest and admit when I've made a mistake.
[edit on 11-1-2005 by Duzey]