It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: Pardon?
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: Pardon?
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Ohhhh if only it really was so easy.....
I hate threads like this, full of false hope and false science I would go on but I really don't have the time to get in to it.
Ohhhh but it is. I witnessed it first hand, and that's it.
Well that's me convinced.
Who needs evidence and basic science when you have testimonials?
Even though it turns physiology 101 on it's head...
(It wouldn't, that was sarcasm).
Lots of links to various websites though, I wonder why.
Then you, when confronted with death, wait for evidence and science. Why do you care what someone else chooses to do with their own life? I ask that question to all of you who are so angry on this thread with the idea that there are alternatives, why do you care what someone does with their own life, especially when it is they who are confronted with death? Do you walk up to someone and rip a cigarette out of their mouth? Do you slam a helmet on the guy riding a motorcycle without one? Do you have a chat with the obese man in line at McDonalds? I think not.
So you can't tell me how it does what I've asked then?
So you can't show any evidence that it bypasses normal digestion?
So you can't tell me how the alkaline nonsense contradicts homeostasis?
I've been working in healthcare (look it up) for 30 years. I care about people's health very much, it's been the one consistent driver of my career.
So that's why I care.
And the reason I'll ask for evidence is because I loathe people like you writing nonsense about something so serious and then dancing around when asked to provide any proof.
And I've said it before and I'll say it again (and I'm still waiting);
If someone can provide real evidence that their alternative treatment works for cancer I'll believe it.
Real evidence means that the cancer is confirmed by standard practice, the stage is confirmed, any previous or current therapy is confirmed, the dose and administration of the alt therapy is confirmed, any regression of the cancer is confirmed, evidence provided that regression is due to the alt therapy etc etc.
If you can't (or more likely won't) provide this then it has to be deduced that you are using some sort of magic.
And I don't believe in magic.
Okay, you've said your piece and I will not oblige, so go away.
originally posted by: Rezlooper
Lol. yeah, and my dear father-in-law would surely have sued me right?
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: and14263
Agreed this is embarrassing the op has been bested in every respect in this thread and he still won't admit to being wrong.
And I am just going to come out and say it....
In my opinion based on what I have read in the op it is my belief that the op has made this whole thing up.
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: and14263
Agreed this is embarrassing the op has been bested in every respect in this thread and he still won't admit to being wrong.
And I am just going to come out and say it....
In my opinion based on what I have read in the op it is my belief that the op has made this whole thing up.
You're an idiot!
Over a period of one year, the kidney function of these patients declined about two thirds more slowly than that of individuals not given the tablets. In fact, their rate of decline was little different from what would be expected with normal ageing.
Rapid progression of kidney disease occurred in just 9 per cent of patients given baking soda compared with 45 per cent of the non-treated group.
Patients taking sodium bicarbonate tablets were also less likely to develop end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis.
Study leader Magdi Yaqoob, Professor of Renal Medicine at the Royal London Hospital, said: 'This study shows baking soda can be useful for people with kidney failure. That is, as long as the dose is regulated and under supervision.
'What happens is the inflammation of kidney is prevented by baking soda because a chemical reaction takes place limiting ammonia production in the kidney.
'This cheap and simple strategy also improves patients' nutritional well-being and has the potential to improve quality of life and of course a clinical outcome that can remove the need for dialysis.
'Baking soda is not classed as a drug so this study has never been tried before.'
originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Rezlooper
You're out of the BOX.