It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alabama GOP Proposes Frightening New Way To Intimidate Abortion Providers

page: 8
26
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 06:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: NthOther

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

Because of separation of church and state.

So the right to personal financial privacy supersedes the right to personal religious freedom because of the Establishment Clause?


Yes


Another funny thing I've noticed--the statist's selective invocation of the Constitution in the rare instances it can be found to support their argument.


Another funny thing is that conservatives are largely guilty of the same thing.
edit on 24-2-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 06:48 AM
link   
Oh for God's sake, not the abortion thing again.

Abortions are legal.
Abortions are not killing babies.

GET.
OVER.
IT.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 06:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn
The GOP are the kings of beating dead horses.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 06:55 AM
link   
a reply to: greencmp

Cruz wants to get rid of public education and force religion on our kids? You guys are bat poop crazy.

The South, our Sunni/Shia's.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 07:02 AM
link   
a reply to: interupt42
Anne is correct in a way. The lawmakers have constructed laws aimed directly at us. Maybe we should circle the wagons around Hillary.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 07:03 AM
link   
a reply to: NthOther


What's so "frightening" about financial disclosure?


Nothing, which is why I think that there should be a law that requires every church to post their financial information on signs on their front lawn. This should include the value of their assets, including real estate, the salaries of its ministers and board members, and how much it would have to pay in taxes if it were not exempt. No problem there, right?



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: NthOther
a reply to: angeldoll

High on the hog, with champagne wishes and caviar dreams?



Gotta pay for them lambo's somehow!

I'd like to know what they make per and what they charge.

Who's paying for the abortions, anyway?

Actually, who is paying for what?



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 07:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

What's frightening is the wanton slaughter of millions of human vessels.

Action...Reaction.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 07:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Q33323
a reply to: Krazysh0t

What's frightening is the wanton slaughter of millions of human vessels.

Action...Reaction.


Abortion is legal. Deal with it.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I am ok with this
someone has to make some kind of effort to give the vulnerable defenseless unborn a chance. Abortion is worse than mass executions by terrorists. At least the humans being executed have or had a chance to defend themselves. The vulnerable unborn have no such luck, and these doctors just foam at the mouth waiting for the money to come in for doing the procedures. SO yea, lets do it


As far as their Sex Ed curriculum, Looks good to me too



a reply to: Krazysh0t

Well the death sentence is also legal in many places for societies proven scumbags. I would hope you support that as well.
edit on 2/24/2016 by AmericanRealist because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 07:57 AM
link   
a reply to: AmericanRealist

You are ok with government intervention to support your morals?



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 08:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

sure. I even think shows like Family Guy should be banned from TV between the hours of 7 am and 10 pm.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 08:06 AM
link   
a reply to: AmericanRealist

Lol. Well that's never going to happen. You'll just have to live with abortions being legal and Family Guy on television. Maybe take some responsibility of your own and you'll never have to worry about your kids watching shows like that or having to contemplate getting an abortion.

Personal responsibility and all that. I hear it's something that conservatives like.
edit on 24-2-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 08:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I got that covered. It is having to hear other kids talk about the perverse things they watched while they playing with mine at the park that disturbs me. Must have pervert parents or something to allow their children watch shows like Family Guy, American Dad, Southpark and so on.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 08:12 AM
link   
"Less government intervention in our lives, no more tyranny! down with the Nanny State!"

"Wait, uh, what? they're doing stuff I like ... enforcing fundamentalist religious views and bullying abortionists?"

"Great! We're finally making our country great again!"

*cue "Proud to be An American"*



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 08:13 AM
link   
a reply to: AmericanRealist

Oh well such is life. Your kids can't grow up in a bubble and will learn about this stuff anyways. Personally, I think sheltering your kids like that is more harmful to them than exposing them to television programming like those shows.

Heck, once you get past the language and content, South Park happens to be a VERY intelligent show (since you brought that show up). Some of the best modern satire in that show in all of pop culture.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 08:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

hey if they get tax payer money witch they do ...then all there info should be available to the tax payer.
If they dont want tax payer money then then they can keep their records secret.
And I think its a good idea for a doctor to tell me the procedure ..the risks both
mentally and physically ...........I mean duh thats just common sense.
Why wouldnt you want to know how they suck the baby out or snip its spinal cord and then harvest
its organs or what it might do to your body or your brain .
I swear the evil trash i hear people spew out of the cake whole man ./



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 08:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
"Less government intervention in our lives, no more tyranny! down with the Nanny State!"

"Wait, uh, what? they're doing stuff I like ... enforcing fundamentalist religious views and bullying abortionists?"

"Great! We're finally making our country great again!"

*cue "Proud to be An American"*



Pretty much sums things up in my view.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 08:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: interupt42
The lawmakers have constructed laws aimed directly at us.


Who is US?
If you mean US as the Upper Middle-class and below then yes they have aimed laws directly at US . If you are saying they aimed laws directly at women specifically , than you are likely to have a chip on your shoulder and not looking at what is really happening.

Taking away your privacy, taking away personal rights, bigger gov't, more taxes, more world conflict, less state rights, more debt , sending jobs oversea, increasing h1 visas, and Oligopoly friendly regulations are things both the DNC and the GOP have done. Those things effect Men,Women,Black,White,Short,tall,Fat,Skinny people not just women.

And guess who has been involved in those same targeted regulations and negotiations, Hillary.




Maybe we should circle the wagons around Hillary

What? Why? She has a history of lying, conflict of interest, and multiple decades of a career politician and what has she fixed?

She claims to have taken on Healthcare, Oil, and lobbyist directly? Well if she did take them on as she CLAIMS , then she failed miserably because those industries are still a cluster F , including for women.

Not to mention that abortion has been an issue for numerous decades under Hillary as first lady,Secretary of state, and numerous other political roles and what has she done different then the other career politicians?

So why as a women should you support her unless you like being lied too and are to sexist to see the conflict of interest revolving around her?

She is not a good representative for anyone including women ,unless you think being as much as an @hole as the other men in politics is what makes a good women politician? She is no different then the rest of the politicians besides her gender and will lie to your face and has already done it several times.

Heck, the Clintons period are scandal ridden full of lies including under oath. They are not worthy of anyones trust, let alone their support.

edit on 25229America/ChicagoWed, 24 Feb 2016 08:25:57 -0600000000p2942 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 08:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: sweets777
a reply to: Krazysh0t

hey if they get tax payer money witch they do ...then all there info should be available to the tax payer.
If they dont want tax payer money then then they can keep their records secret.


It doesn't work that way for literally ANY other industry or medical procedure. Plus, taxes don't go to fund abortions.


And I think its a good idea for a doctor to tell me the procedure ..the risks both
mentally and physically ...........I mean duh thats just common sense.


This isn't what the OP is talking about.


Why wouldnt you want to know how they suck the baby out or snip its spinal cord and then harvest
its organs or what it might do to your body or your brain .


I didn't want to know how the surgeons repaired my ACL when I blew it out, so why would I want to know how an abortion is performed? Don't be silly. You are conflating your personal qualms against abortion with a standard medical procedure.


I swear the evil trash i hear people spew out of the cake whole man .


Says the guy who can't separate his emotions from logic.



new topics

top topics



 
26
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join