It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: ReadLeader
Depends. Emotionally the response is the corporations should pay. Logically it is not the corporation's fault.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: darkwarrior
It's patently frivolous.
It's been pointed out in this thread that with this line of reasoning, everyone everywhere who was even remotely involved in the manufacturing process should be liable.
I'm sorry for their loss, but no. This is wrong.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
It is about trial lawyers thinking that they can make a buck off of these people's misery and public sentiment.
originally posted by: cenpuppie
If this goes through, then auto makers should be sued when someone is killed by a drunk driver for not having breath analyzers in their cars.
originally posted by: Cloudbuster
That's just crazy,if anything they should sue the second amendment is it? The right to bare arms and do mass murder.